On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 17:28, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 09:51, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote: > > On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 09:43, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > > > > You may be encountering a different issue ... (2.6 is usually overall > > > faster than 2.4 here, > > Same here. Soeren, have you verified the difference actually is related > to X, e.g. by redirecting the output to a file? Did you conduct both > tests as soon after bootup as possible to minimize the influence of > caching? ...
Yes fresh reboot - both this morning. A time find ./ >/dev/null says on 2.6. : time find >/dev/null real 4m27.772s user 0m0.855s sys 0m11.292s while it seems slower than 2.4 (not yet tested) it does not justify the 28minutes to display the files :-/ Soeren.
