Re: do modules work with 2.4.x kernels?

2001-07-30 Thread Michel Dänzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 07/15/01 >at 07:15 PM, Mike Fedyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > >On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 10:13:28PM -0400, F. Heitkamp wrote: > Ethan > >Benson wrote: > >> > >> >On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 10:46:06AM -0400, Frederick V. Heitkamp wrote: > >>

Re: Bug#107081: PowerPC: reuse same va_list more that once failed

2001-07-30 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > This is not a bug in gcc, or glibc. It's a feature of the PPC > > > va_list implementation, mandated by the PPC ABI that we > > > need to follow (otherwise all sort of hell breaks loose). > > > > Thanks. I'll close the bug now. > > What about re

Re: Bug#107081: PowerPC: reuse same va_list more that once failed

2001-07-30 Thread Edouard G. Parmelan
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 08:05:59PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > What about reassigning it to wget (or whatever the original package was)? > > > The bug is still out there ... > > > > I presume there is already a bug filed for that package, else the > > problem would not have been known to

Re: not playing nicely

2001-07-30 Thread James Moss
On Monday, 30 July 2001, at 12:18:30 (-0700), Andrew Sharp wrote: > That's funny, it worked until you did something dangerous like > "update software" in apple land, but you blame it on the linux > kernel?? This list is littered with posts from people that had > trouble with this sort of thing aft

Re: not playing nicely

2001-07-30 Thread J. Steinbachs
On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Andrew Sharp wrote: > James Moss wrote: > > > > On Monday, 30 July 2001, at 11:22:58 (-0700), chamster wrote: > > > Have you been able to boot off this CD on other Macs, preferably a similar > > > model? > > > > > Oddly enough, I was able to boot this very machine several time

Re: not playing nicely

2001-07-30 Thread Andrew Sharp
James Moss wrote: > > On Monday, 30 July 2001, at 11:22:58 (-0700), chamster wrote: > > Have you been able to boot off this CD on other Macs, preferably a similar > > model? > > > Oddly enough, I was able to boot this very machine several times and install > debian, etc... but then I got a new har

Re: Linux Keycodes

2001-07-30 Thread Olaf Hering
On Mon, Jul 30, Stefan Haller wrote: > > this also eliminates the need to maintain separate keymaps for > > standard keyboards, no more need for a mac version and a i386 version > > and a sparc version etc etc. > > Ethan, you keep ignoring the fact that this is only true for US > keyboards. We

Re: not playing nicely

2001-07-30 Thread James Moss
On Monday, 30 July 2001, at 11:22:58 (-0700), chamster wrote: > Have you been able to boot off this CD on other Macs, preferably a similar > model? > Oddly enough, I was able to boot this very machine several times and install debian, etc... but then I got a new hard drive. The Hard drive is fin

Re: not playing nicely

2001-07-30 Thread chamster
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 11:25:38AM -0400, James Moss wrote: > First I setup the partition 5, OSX and OS9, then I tried to boot from the > debian cd. It gets to the "booting..." and stops. I've tried using options > "video=ofonly" "video=atyfb", neither of which worked. I don't know what to > try

Re: Icebooks

2001-07-30 Thread John Hughes
On Monday 30 July 2001 01:46, Yves wrote: > I agree with that. I have swapped the translators of dmasound_core.c on my > icebook, and I can now listen music with xmms, at high volume (well with > set_eq 1...). Do you have the hacked dmasound_core.c file? or a patch that does it? I looked through

Re: Bug#107081: PowerPC: reuse same va_list more that once failed

2001-07-30 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > What about reassigning it to wget (or whatever the original package was)? > > The bug is still out there ... > > I presume there is already a bug filed for that package, else the > problem would not have been known to begin with. Doesn't seem like it. #107081 was against gcc before you reass

Re: Bug#107081: PowerPC: reuse same va_list more that once failed

2001-07-30 Thread Ben Collins
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 07:48:46PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > This is not a bug in gcc, or glibc. It's a feature of the PPC > > > va_list implementation, mandated by the PPC ABI that we > > > need to follow (otherwise all sort of hell breaks loose). > > > > Thanks. I'll close the bug now

Re: Bug#107081: PowerPC: reuse same va_list more that once failed

2001-07-30 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > This is not a bug in gcc, or glibc. It's a feature of the PPC > > va_list implementation, mandated by the PPC ABI that we > > need to follow (otherwise all sort of hell breaks loose). > > Thanks. I'll close the bug now. What about reassigning it to wget (or whatever the original package was)

Re: Icebooks

2001-07-30 Thread Yves
James Tyson([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 08:36:13AM +1200: > > Wow, it works!! sorta. Well, you're right, I got beep. As far as > > anything > > elsewell, I am figuring it is normal at this stage in the > > driversbut > > I will mention it just to make sure what I am seei

Re: Bug#107081: PowerPC: reuse same va_list more that once failed

2001-07-30 Thread Ben Collins
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 07:19:30PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > And stdarg doesn't have these issues? The problem is that va_list isn't a > > > pointer on powerpc so it gets modified across calls. Saving the initial > > > va_list state and restoring it before reuse should solve this for vara

Re: Bug#107081: PowerPC: reuse same va_list more that once failed

2001-07-30 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > And stdarg doesn't have these issues? The problem is that va_list isn't a > > pointer on powerpc so it gets modified across calls. Saving the initial > > va_list state and restoring it before reuse should solve this for varargs. > > No, stdarg and vararg are both implemented in gcc, so the bug

Re: Bug#107081: PowerPC: reuse same va_list more that once failed

2001-07-30 Thread Ben Collins
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 06:59:22PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Ben Collins wrote: > > > I realise that both reuse same va_list more that once. The following > > > probram demonstrate this bug: > > > > stdarg is implemented in gcc, AFAIK. > > And stdarg doesn't have these

Re: Bug#107081: PowerPC: reuse same va_list more that once failed

2001-07-30 Thread Michael Schmitz
On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Ben Collins wrote: > > I realise that both reuse same va_list more that once. The following > > probram demonstrate this bug: > > stdarg is implemented in gcc, AFAIK. And stdarg doesn't have these issues? The problem is that va_list isn't a pointer on powerpc so it gets modif

Re: Altivec and G4

2001-07-30 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 11:16:17AM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote: > Greetings, and thanks for your suggestion! -m7400 is indeed needed to > get the assembler to work. Can an option to gcc be specified to pass > this option through to the assembler, allowing one to call the > standard gcc to compile t

not playing nicely

2001-07-30 Thread James Moss
After RTFMing carefully, noting that all docs might have slight errors, etc, I began my Debian PowerPC install via CD. First I set up all the hard drives, using the Apple Supplied "drive setup" or whatever it's called on the MacOS-9 boot CD. I intended to use MacOSX/MacOS9 on this laptop as well,

Re: Re: Modem problems

2001-07-30 Thread Steven Hanley
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 04:49:08PM +0200, Stefan Heimann wrote: some stuff about modem problems this seems to be a problem I had with my powerbook also possibly basically pon providername (or if you must wvdial) needs to have something added to the init string to make the modem actually work bas

Re: Altivec and G4

2001-07-30 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings, and thanks for your suggestion! -m7400 is indeed needed to get the assembler to work. Can an option to gcc be specified to pass this option through to the assembler, allowing one to call the standard gcc to compile the assembly code? (-m7400 to gcc does not work.) '/usr/bin/gcc -m740

Re: Re: Modem problems

2001-07-30 Thread Edouard G. Parmelan
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 04:49:08PM +0200, Stefan Heimann wrote: > > 'insmod macserial' should give you a better result. > > > > exert from my dmesg: > > PowerMac Z8530 serial driver version 2.0 > > tty00 at 0xd58ae020 (irq = 22) is a Z8530 ESCC (cobalt modem) > > tty01 at 0xd58b5000 (irq = 50) is

Re: Re: Modem problems

2001-07-30 Thread Stefan Heimann
> Hi, > > Stefan Heimann wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > I use a Powerbook G3 with woody. After upgrading to Kernel 2.4.6, the modem > > doesn't work! I tried /dev/ttyS0, /dev/ttyS2, /dev/ttyS3, /dev/ttyS4: no > > way. > > Then I detected a startup message: > > Serial driver version 5.05a (2001-03-2

Re: Bug#107081: PowerPC: reuse same va_list more that once failed

2001-07-30 Thread Ben Collins
reassign 107081 gcc-2.95 thanks On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 12:46:03PM +0200, Edouard G. Parmelan wrote: > Package: libc6 > Version: 2.2.3-5 > Severity: important > > Hi, > > On PowerPC wget coredump into vfprintf() (bug #104325). > MasqMail-0.1.15-1 also coredump with same stack trace. > > I real

Re: X crash after logout

2001-07-30 Thread Michel Dänzer
Russell Hires wrote: > I'm running woody, and I just updated everything a few minutes ago, so I've > got the latest of whatever there is...Anyway, X crashes, or seems to crash > when I log out of KDE. I will logout, and get a black screen that will only > show the login dialog -- so maybe kdm is c

Re: Bug#107054: Doesn't send data to lpr on powerpc!

2001-07-30 Thread Adam Goode
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 05:38:03AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > Every architecture is built automatically without human intervention, using > an automatic compile-time detection scheme. > > If something is wrong on powerpc, it probably means that the built process > was somehow disturbed / co

Re: gpm & X settings for titanium

2001-07-30 Thread Adam Goode
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 10:36:50PM -0700, Wilhelm Fitzpatrick wrote: > > With Xkb, you probably need XkbModel "pc104" or any pc variant with Linux > > keycodes, "macintosh_old" otherwise. Without Xkb, it should work either way. > > In my XF86Config-4, I have XkbModel set to powerpcps2. When I use

Re: Linux Keycodes

2001-07-30 Thread Ethan Benson
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 11:03:23AM +0200, Stefan Haller wrote: > > this also eliminates the need to maintain separate keymaps for > > standard keyboards, no more need for a mac version and a i386 version > > and a sparc version etc etc. > > Ethan, you keep ignoring the fact that this is only tru

Bug#107054: Doesn't send data to lpr on powerpc!

2001-07-30 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
[ resent, had wrong d-powerpc@ address --edd ] tags 107054 moreinfo quit Adam, "Adam" == Adam Goode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Adam> Package: a2ps Version: 4.13b-10 Severity: normal Adam> Adam> After processing, a2ps generally sends its output to lpr for Adam> printing. On powerpc

PowerPC: reuse same va_list more that once failed

2001-07-30 Thread Edouard G. Parmelan
Package: libc6 Version: 2.2.3-5 Severity: important Hi, On PowerPC wget coredump into vfprintf() (bug #104325). MasqMail-0.1.15-1 also coredump with same stack trace. I realise that both reuse same va_list more that once. The following probram demonstrate this bug: #include #include void vl

Re: Linux Keycodes

2001-07-30 Thread Stefan Haller
> this also eliminates the need to maintain separate keymaps for > standard keyboards, no more need for a mac version and a i386 version > and a sparc version etc etc. Ethan, you keep ignoring the fact that this is only true for US keyboards. We do need separate keymaps for non-US Apple keyboar

j2sdkee

2001-07-30 Thread Lorenzo De Vito
I'm very interested in j2sdkee but I don't know if there are portings on DebianPPC, can anyone help me ?

Re: kernel package for ibook2

2001-07-30 Thread Michel Dänzer
Bastien Nocera wrote: > - DRM module (insmod r128) The X server should load the module automatically, no need for the user to bother. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)\ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer CS student, Free Software enthusiast \XFree86 and DRI project member

Re: Package version diffs from other ports

2001-07-30 Thread Jeremy T. Bouse
Daniel Jacobowitz was said to been seen saying: > That's testing for you. If you want anything current, don't run > testing. > Yeah but for this machine I want more stability but want more recent than stable... Also being as woody/testing should be nearing a release I would assume that al

Re: gpm & X settings for titanium

2001-07-30 Thread Wilhelm Fitzpatrick
> With Xkb, you probably need XkbModel "pc104" or any pc variant with Linux > keycodes, "macintosh_old" otherwise. Without Xkb, it should work either way. In my XF86Config-4, I have XkbModel set to powerpcps2. When I used pc104, some keys (such as the arrow keys) didn't work.

Re: Linux Keycodes

2001-07-30 Thread Ethan Benson
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 09:58:23PM -0400, Russell Hires wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm reading all this discussion on the keycodes and such...but I don't quite > understand. If there's some basic docs about this, point me to them. If there > is a keymap (similar to the Mac OS desk accessory th