On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 08:05:59PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > What about reassigning it to wget (or whatever the original package was)? > > > The bug is still out there ... > > > > I presume there is already a bug filed for that package, else the > > problem would not have been known to begin with. > > Doesn't seem like it. #107081 was against gcc before you reassigned it, > and I could not find a matching bug under [EMAIL PROTECTED], wget or > masqmail.
Package wget already have #104325. Fill free to assigne #107081 to masqmail, upstream author is already fixing it :-) > But it'll come up again. This isn't the first time I've seen these varargs > bugs. My most confusing one involved setjmp/longjmp to achieve the va_list > reuse :-) Should be possible to have a GCC warning when same va_list was used more that once as in vlog_and_print() ? -- Edouard G. Parmelan http://egp.free.fr
