is mail can be a starting point :)
ciao,
- Forwarded message from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
From: Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-project@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging
practice
is about
freedom. We like open source because it's freedom, it lets you to choose: what
if we decide to change to.. rpm? Should we ever achive a sort of consensus on
this, a packaging tool independent policy would not need to be changed. Of
course, rpm is an example :)
ciao,
--
Luca - De W
ocs >/dev/null
2>&1; then
postinst-suid: if command -v suidregister >/dev/null 2>&1 && [ -e
/etc/suid.conf ]; then
postrm-suid: command -v suidunregister >/dev/null 2>&1; then
prerm-doc-base: command -v install-docs >/dev/null 2>&1; then
The same go
eliberately use command -v in my maintainer scripts.
Change the rules for all the Debian distribution because you find that
'command -v' is handy, seems quite excessive to me...
ciao,
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A
cy rocks, and that task may be accomplished be any
developer, so the only way i can demonstrate it is doing.
ciao,
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][A-Za-z\-]*[iy]'\?s$ | as fine or rude sentences have
Luca, a wannabe ``
at the election period is over: you were quite friendly.
ciao,
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][A-Za-z\-]*[iy]'\?s$ | as fine or rude sentences have
Luca, a wannabe ``Good guy''.
o me, this demonstrate one of the property of `make', and, at the same time,
the fact that with do not have to use only `make', thanks to simple interface.
Why do not give me an interface, and let me to use whatever i like?
ciao,
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant o
s not to have the same frequency. With
this sentence i'm not blaming anyone for this. My offer still stands, even if
i suppose i'd contact Randolph Chung first.
ciao,
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][
tion as the copyright
notice; we obviously cannot include the copyright notice in the package
control file.
My proposal to give a format to the copyright file still stand.
This could be the first step, and then we can figure out how to bring this to
the users trough dselect etc.
ciao,
--
Luc
t file can be
extracted from the binary packages. Give the copiright file 4 trivial tags, and
I'll be hapy to play with them for you.
Packaged:
Upstream-Authors:
Upstream-URI:
Copyright:
Easy to check, change, extract from binary packages... why not?
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De
om to
> ; as opposed to the change from
> to plus a field for URIs>. The latter is much less intrusive.
I would prefer the first, even if it is more intrusive. IMHO an URI
filed does not make sense in the package control file, and formatting a source
of information (like the copyright
ols in Description: field like:
Or whatever.
These may easily be parsed and used on packages.debian.org.
What about this?
ciao,
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][-A-Za-z]*[iy]'?s$ | as fine or rude sentences have
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 12:48:33AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 10:57:48PM +0100, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis
> wrote:
> >
> >
>
> URI schemes are not to be used as a means of expressing the purpose of
> the URI.
I was refering to wik
differences among people working on some package.
ciao,
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][-A-Za-z]*[iy]'?s$ | as fine or rude sentences have
Infinite loop: see `Loop, infinite'.| something in common: they
Loop
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 02:43:30AM +1100, Steve Kowalik wrote:
> At 2:20 am, Sunday, February 9 2003, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis mumbled:
> I personally think in cases such as alsa-driver and libc6, where you have
> the list and all the people who upload the package on one
#x27;ll propose the changes to the
upstream.
ciao,
P.S.: I'm considering the opportunity to package ZEO for zope. Do you think i
should go on?
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][-A-Za-z]*[iy]'?s$ | as fine or rude
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 03:42:13PM +0100, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
[...]
Sorry, I meant to send that mail to -python, but i used the wrong alias :P
ciao,
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][-A-Za-z]*[iy]&
7;ll modify this bug soon.
ciao,
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][A-Za-z\-]*[iy]'\?s$ | as fine or rude sentences have
Luca, a wannabe ``Good guy''. | something in commo
when a license can
be considered common in Debian.
I propose to consider common any license that is used by more than X (i
suggest X to be 15) absolute number of actively maintained source packages.
Licenses that are referenced by less than X-Y (i suggest Y to be 3) source
packages, are entitled t
packages shareing a common license might consider to have a
leader package installing their common license under /usr/share/common-license
> I think this proposal is a bad idea.
I hope it's better now.
ciao,
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as
ebian/interface could be a file in which we describe the interface
implemented by each component (object) of the source package.
$ cat debian/interface
rules: , , ...
control: , , ...
...
ciao,
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-
n another patch, not a solution. The point
here is that our sources are becoming more complex each day. We cant go on
with patches for long.
ciao,
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][A-Za-z\-]*[iy]'\?s$ |
a new tag in
debian/control, implementing debian/rules.version or any other proposal.
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][A-Za-z\-]*[iy]'\?s$ | as fine or rude sentences have
Luca, a wannabe ``Good guy''.
ate it with the clean target of
debian/rules is dirty trick and is not in the meaning of the target.
ciao,
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][A-Za-z\-]*[iy]'\?s$ | as fine or rude sentences have
Luca, a wannabe ``Good guy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The fact that i'm not writing mails does not imply that i agree: i'm simply
waiting reply to questions i would have asked. Indeed you've at least two
seconds to this proposal, but there are still uncovered issue
might have privately replyed, but in this
case i'd like the answare to be sent here for logging too.
thanks,
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][A-Za-z\-]*[iy]'\?s$ | as fine or rude sentences have
Luca, a wannabe
26 matches
Mail list logo
