Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 36151 [GUIDELINE] /etc/init.d scripts should specify an explicit PATH
Bug#36151: [REJECTED] /etc/init.d scripts should specify an explicit PATH
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 42870 [GUIDELINE] every alternative should be usable
Bug#42870: [OLD PR
This note is being sent as part of a project to clean out old (> 1yr)
debian-policy proposals. If you disagree with action below please
respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not to me, so that the discussion may
be carried out publically in debian-policy. Feel free to re-open the
bug while it's being discu
This note is being sent as part of a project to clean out old (> 1yr)
debian-policy proposals. If you disagree with action below please
respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not to me, so that the discussion may
be carried out publically in debian-policy. Feel free to re-open the
bug while it's being discu
This note is being sent as part of a project to clean out old (> 1yr)
debian-policy proposals. If you disagree with action below please
respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not to me, so that the discussion may
be carried out publically in debian-policy. Feel free to re-open the
bug while it's being discu
This note is being sent as part of a project to clean out old (> 1yr)
debian-policy proposals. If you disagree with action below please
respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not to me, so that the discussion may
be carried out publically in debian-policy. Feel free to re-open the
bug while it's being discu
This note is being sent as part of a project to clean out old (> 1yr)
debian-policy proposals. If you disagree with action below please
respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not to me, so that the discussion may
be carried out publically in debian-policy. Feel free to re-open the
bug while it's being discu
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:16:53 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug #27137: Clarification of non-free
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:16:54 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug #30036:
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
This is a summary of the status and disposition of many of the old (>
1yr) debian-policy proposals. Only bugs marked as "fixed" were
considered; they were marked this way because they had been rejected
or hadn't had any action in several months ("stalled"). If you
disagree with my action, please c
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:16:54 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug #41113: Naming Conventions for modules
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:16:54 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug #33826: Policy should discuss '.sh' suffixes on
/etc/init.d files
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:16:54 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug #42554: A proposal for README.Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:16:54 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug #41902: Test suite proposal
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:16:54 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug #42907: Policy should mention permissions of
/dev/[dsp,audio,mixer]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:16:54 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug #43077: Remove the incompatibility argument from 5.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:16:54 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug #43483: section 3.2 should not allow static user ids
(except root=0).
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:16:54 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug #43757: My emacs can't find some info files
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:16:54 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug #43928: libc and kernel source policy
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:16:54 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug #51842: close advertising hole in the DFSG
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:16:54 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug #54968: Lintian, archive maintenance and and policy
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Thanks, I'm looking into this.
--
Raul
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 10:49:07AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit
>
> > On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 08:42:28PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > > UCS4 is not a satisfactory encoding for our needs, unfortunatel
21 matches
Mail list logo
