Your message dated Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:16:54 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug #51842: close advertising hole in the DFSG
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at bugs) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Dec 1999 12:25:07 +0000
Received: (qmail 26961 invoked from network); 3 Dec 1999 12:25:01 -0000
Received: from frad.onet.pl (194.204.188.215)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 3 Dec 1999 12:25:01 -0000
Received: from priv3.onet.pl ([194.204.188.143]:43872 "EHLO priv3.onet.pl")
by frad.onet.pl with ESMTP id <S901845AbPLCMYa>;
Fri, 3 Dec 1999 13:24:30 +0100
Received: from pa174.legnica.ppp.tpnet.pl ([212.160.25.174]:264 "EHLO tavaiah")
by priv3.onet.pl with ESMTP id <1040679-169>; Fri, 3 Dec 1999 13:23:51 +0100
Received: from bashiz by tavaiah with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian))
id 11tdDy-0000B1-00; Thu, 02 Dec 1999 21:53:10 +0100
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 21:53:10 +0100
From: Tomasz Wegrzanowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PROPOSED] closing hole in DFSG that can force you to include some
text in advertisement
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0i
Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
package: debian-policy
version: 3.1.0.0
severity: wishlist
beacause any otherwise DFSG-compatible package can possibly
force you to include something like :
`This software contains code made by Fooniversity of Somewhere'
in advertisement of your distro ( even of official Debian ) :
--- policy.sgml.old Fri Nov 5 00:46:28 1999
+++ policy.sgml Thu Dec 2 21:41:55 1999
@@ -228,6 +228,17 @@
other fee for such sale.
</p>
</item>
+ <tag>Free Advertising
+ </tag>
+ <item>
+ <p>
+ The license of a Debian component may restrict
+ referencing to author in it's advertisement
+ but can not force inclusion of any text nor any
+ other element in advertisement of neither program
+ nor distribution containing this program.
+ </p>
+ </item>
<tag>Source Code
</tag>
<item>
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 51842-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jun 2001 18:16:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 13 13:16:59 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 206.180.143.9.adsl.hal-pc.org (speedy.private)
[::ffff:206.180.143.9]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15AFCM-0003Uy-00; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:16:58 -0500
Received: by speedy.private (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 241714713; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:16:54 -0500 (CDT)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug #51842: close advertising hole in the DFSG
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:16:54 -0500 (CDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve Greenland)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This note is being sent as part of a project to clean out old (> 1yr)
debian-policy proposals. If you disagree with action below please
respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not to me, so that the discussion may
be carried out publically in debian-policy. Feel free to re-open the
bug while it's being discussed -- I'm not trying to force any
particular disposition, just taking my best shot at resolving dead
issues.
Bug #51842: close advertising hole in the DFSG
Summary: Are DFSG free licenses allowed to restrict or require
advertising content when distributed? (e.g. old style BSD)
Discussion: This is clearly not a debian-policy issue, but something
that requires modifying/clarifying the DFSG.
Action: close
