Your message dated Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:16:54 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug #41113: Naming Conventions for modules
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jul 1999 21:44:39 +0000
Received: (qmail 18892 invoked from network); 11 Jul 1999 21:44:38 -0000
Received: from dhcp008.53.lvcm.com (HELO darren.benham.net) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 1999 21:44:38 -0000
Received: from gecko by darren.benham.net with local (Exim 3.02 #1
(Debian-home))
id 113REn-0004fr-00; Sun, 11 Jul 1999 14:34:17 -0700
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 23:10:22 +0200
From: Alexander Reelsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Proposal: Naming Conventions for modules
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.6i
Received: from master.debian.org [209.41.108.5] (qmailr) by darren.benham.net
with smtp (Exim 3.02 #1 (Debian-home)) id 113QiT-0004cd-00; Sun, 11 Jul 1999
14:00:53 -0700
Received: (qmail 25063 invoked by uid 1227); 11 Jul 1999 21:11:04 -0000
MBOX-Line: From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 11 21:11:04 1999
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 24912 invoked from network); 11 Jul 1999 21:10:56 -0000
Received: from murphy.debian.org (209.41.108.199) by master.debian.org with
SMTP; 11 Jul 1999 21:10:56 -0000
Received: (qmail 12622 invoked by uid 38); 11 Jul 1999 21:10:29 -0000
Resent-Date: 11 Jul 1999 21:10:28 -0000
Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.6i
Organization: rhwd-networking
Resent-Message-ID: <"HGGqDD.A.AED.BhQi3"@murphy>
Resent-From: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: <debian-policy@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/4947
Old-X-Loop: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Precedence: list
X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Sender: "Darren O. Benham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
package: debian-policy
Hello
The following is a proposal to add some rules to the debian policy concerning
the naming conventions for modules, ie perl- and pythonmodules.
Earlier, when I was not debianized that way I am now, I installed Perl/Tk
called perl-tk. Then, I tried to install Gtk-Perl (its current name, if I
remember right). I thought it was called perl-gtk, but it is/was called
libgtk-perl. Now I know, most modules are named libfoo-bar-perl and not
perl-foo-bar.
So, a few days ago I installed python and lots of modules. They have all got
the name naming scheme (at least those I installed), namely python-foo-bar.
That was the point in time I was completely confused.
Long story, short proposal:
In my opinion we should get a stricter policy on this problem, else we will
lose the overview of all those modules (although most maintainers name the
modules after the standard scheme). It should be decided whether the modules
start with libfoo-bar-language or with language-foo-bar. Both is a bad mix.
Switching the programming language and the scheme of searching for modules is
IMHO not a solution and not the intention I think/hope.
MfG/Greetings, Alexander
--
Alexander Reelsen http://joker.rhwd.owl.de
"BUGS This manpage is confusing."
-- getopt(3)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 41113-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jun 2001 18:16:56 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 13 13:16:55 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 206.180.143.9.adsl.hal-pc.org (speedy.private)
[::ffff:206.180.143.9]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15AFCJ-0003TR-00; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:16:55 -0500
Received: by speedy.private (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 661F34713; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:16:54 -0500 (CDT)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug #41113: Naming Conventions for modules
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:16:54 -0500 (CDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve Greenland)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This note is being sent as part of a project to clean out old (> 1yr)
debian-policy proposals. If you disagree with action below please
respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not to me, so that the discussion may
be carried out publically in debian-policy. Feel free to re-open the
bug while it's being discussed -- I'm not trying to force any
particular disposition, just taking my best shot at resolving dead
issues.
Bug #41113: Naming Conventions for modules
Summary: Policy should consistent naming conventions for language
extension modules (perl, python and java were the examples under
discussion). Lots of suggestions, preferences and history, no
agreement or concrete proposal.
Discussion: Nothing added in over a year.
Action: close.
