Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
> Changing the location of the data dir is usually trivial (edit
> /etc/inetd), but ...
people should use debconf for that.
> A tool to query the location of that tftp chroot surely
> help postinst script configuring the package that ship files.
looks overengineered to me.
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 15:08 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 08:37:42AM +0200, Franklin PIAT wrote:
> > Package: debian-policy
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > I've worked on the following policy snippet. As far as I am concerned, I
> > would rather make the default location compu
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 08:37:42AM +0200, Franklin PIAT wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Severity: wishlist
>
> I've worked on the following policy snippet. As far as I am concerned, I
> would rather make the default location compulsory, and probably drop
> "tftp-get-root-location" then.
1. If /
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:07:32PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I'm not horribly fond of shipping files in /var/lib either,
>> but... there aren't a lot of great options here, I understand. It's
>> very similar to the problem with configuring web appl
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:07:32PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Steve Langasek pointed out[1] that the location /srv/tftp could be used,
> > but no package should provide any file in it. I consider this would
> > defeat the purpose of having a standa
Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Steve Langasek pointed out[1] that the location /srv/tftp could be used,
> but no package should provide any file in it. I consider this would
> defeat the purpose of having a standard location (pxelinux.0 and
> elilo.efi couldn't be dropped by respectiv
Here's an updated text, based on feedback on debian-policy comments :
Steve Langasek pointed out[1] that the location /srv/tftp could be
used, but no package should provide any file in it. I consider this
would defeat the purpose of having a standard location (pxelinux.0 and
elilo.efi couldn't be
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 16:38 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > And it should :
> > * Define /srv/tftp as the default tftp root directory.
> BTW, you should probably open a bug against debian-policy for this so that
> we can start tracking it.
done
Package: debian-policy
Severity: wishlist
[Opening a bug, as suggested on [EMAIL PROTECTED] . sorry for spamming]
Hello,
As I were writing an email about the consistency of tftpboot directory,
I fount a previous debian-policy thread[1] where it seemed that a
consensus were already met.
(If you
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 04:38:33PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > And it should :
> > * Define /srv/tftp as the default tftp root directory.
> I think encoding this directory into a package default violates the FHS
> requirements for /srv, althou
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 12:52:54AM +0200, Franklin PIAT wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As I were writing an email about the consistency of tftpboot directory,
> I fount a previous debian-policy thread[1] where it seemed that a
> consensus were already met.
> (If you wonder why I'm interested with this, see
Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And it should :
> * Define /srv/tftp as the default tftp root directory.
I think encoding this directory into a package default violates the FHS
requirements for /srv, although I'm not sure. It's hard for me to tell
where the line should be draw
Hello,
As I were writing an email about the consistency of tftpboot directory,
I fount a previous debian-policy thread[1] where it seemed that a
consensus were already met.
(If you wonder why I'm interested with this, see [2])
I've worked on the following policy snippet. As far as I am concerned
13 matches
Mail list logo
