On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 04:38:33PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > And it should :
> > * Define /srv/tftp as the default tftp root directory.
> I think encoding this directory into a package default violates the FHS
> requirements for /srv, although I'm not sure. It's hard for me to tell
> where the line should be drawn. Distribution packages are not allowed to
> assume anything about the layout and organization of /srv, since that's
> reserved for the local administrator. But I don't know if offering a
> default via debconf constitutes making assumptions.
FHS 2.3 says:
The methodology used to name subdirectories of /srv is unspecified as there
is currently no consensus on how this should be done. One method for
structuring data under /srv is by protocol, eg. ftp, rsync, www, and cvs.
On large systems it can be useful to structure /srv by administrative
context, such as /srv/physics/www, /srv/compsci/cvs, etc. This setup will
differ from host to host. Therefore, no program should rely on a specific
subdirectory structure of /srv existing or data necessarily being stored in
/srv. However /srv should always exist on FHS compliant systems and should
be used as the default location for such data.
I would argue that using /srv/tftp as a default path is using it "as the
default location for such data", and that this is consequently a correct and
proper use of /srv, as long as no package attempts to install data there.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
