> "Uwe" == Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Uwe> I have proposed to debian-devel (and lately also to
Uwe> debian-policy) to introduce a new virtual package
Uwe> 'httpd-cgi'...
What came out of this?
Please Cc me, I'm not a subscriber of debian-policy...
--
Turbo _
bian-policy) to
introduce a new virtual package 'httpd-cgi'...
There are several Debian packages which contain CGI scripts which
depend on (or suggest etc.) 'httpd', but not all HTTP servers actually
have CGI support, so there's a problem...
My suggested solution is to add a new
Hi Chris,
On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 04:25:32PM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:
> As for the proposal itself, "http-cgi" seems like a reasonable name,
> and a reasonable virtual package. The only thing I'd ask is this be
> added to the daemons *before* any packages try to use it as a
> dependency. Get in
> "Chris" == Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Chris> This part of policy is not very clear. As I read it, you
Chris> don't need to make a formal proposal for new virtual
Chris> package names (or menu categories); you just have to
Chris> discuss the proposal on d-policy
On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 06:46:53PM +0100, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> I hereby propose to add a new virtual package called 'httpd-cgi' to
> the list of virtual packages in virtual-package-names-list.txt.
This part of policy is not very clear. As I read it, you don't need
to make a formal proposal for n
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.5.6.0
Severity: wishlist
Hi everyone.
I hereby propose to add a new virtual package called 'httpd-cgi' to
the list of virtual packages in virtual-package-names-list.txt.
Reason:
There are several packages which depend on (or suggest or whatever)
'httpd'. Some
6 matches
Mail list logo
