Hi Chris, On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 04:25:32PM -0800, Chris Waters wrote: > As for the proposal itself, "http-cgi" seems like a reasonable name, > and a reasonable virtual package. The only thing I'd ask is this be > added to the daemons *before* any packages try to use it as a > dependency. Get in touch with the httpd maintainers, and make sure > they're ready and willing to do this, and (if no one has objected by > that time) we should be go.
Will do. My plan was to first file bugs against all HTTP servers that they should Provide: httpd-cgi. If all webservers have done that, file bugs against all packages which should use httpd-cgi... Btw, if I'm not mistaken this will not be relevant for woody, as policy is already frozen, right? Uwe. -- :------------------ Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ------------------: | http://htsserver.sourceforge.net -- Holsham Traders | | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org -- Unmaintained Free Software | :---------------------- http://www.hermann-uwe.de ------------------ :wq -:
