Bill Allombert writes:
> The point is that if there are licenses not in common-licenses that are
> much more common than CC0, it would make more sense to add them rather
> than CC0.
license-count says that CC0-1.0 looks pretty good. Here are the complete
results with patterns for CC0-1.0 added.
Hello,
On Sat, Dec 09 2017, Bill Allombert wrote:
> What work are you referring to ?
Longer copyright files are more painful to edit.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 11:53:51AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Dec 09 2017, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
> > See the file tools/license-count in the policy git repo and look up
> > the debian-policy list archive for previous statistics.
>
> Thanks.
>
> > The point is that if ther
Hello,
On Sat, Dec 09 2017, Bill Allombert wrote:
> See the file tools/license-count in the policy git repo and look up
> the debian-policy list archive for previous statistics.
Thanks.
> The point is that if there are licenses not in common-licenses that
> are much more common than CC0, it wou
On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 10:26:26AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello Bill,
>
> On Sat, Dec 09 2017, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
> > So, what is the percentage of packages under this license ? This has
> > always been the criterium used to put it in common-licenses.
>
> Could you say more, please?
Hello Bill,
On Sat, Dec 09 2017, Bill Allombert wrote:
> So, what is the percentage of packages under this license ? This has
> always been the criterium used to put it in common-licenses.
Could you say more, please? What was the percentage used in the past?
We might want to revise that perce
On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 12:13:25PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Dec 08 2017, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/policy/ch-docs.rst b/policy/ch-docs.rst index
> > dc02bc6..1de221f 100644 --- a/policy/ch-docs.rst +++
> > b/policy/ch-docs.rst @@ -208,11 +208,12 @@ important be
7 matches
Mail list logo
