On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 11:53:51AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello, > > On Sat, Dec 09 2017, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > See the file tools/license-count in the policy git repo and look up > > the debian-policy list archive for previous statistics. > > Thanks. > > > The point is that if there are licenses not in common-licenses that > > are much more common than CC0, it would make more sense to add them > > rather than CC0. > > I don't think this is a good argument. For example, it may be that the > other CC-* licenses are more common than CC0. But there are complex > reasons why adding those CC-* licenses to common-licenses will take more > work. We shouldn't let that block adding CC0 just because it is not the > most common CC license.
What work are you referring to ? What I have described is the common practice for managing common-licenses which was used so far as you can see in the archive. Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here.
