Hi,
> Yes. It is also the future.
> ISO-2022 may be nice, but it is not the future.
Please note that not all terms I proposed are related to ISO-2022.
It is only a part of my proposal and not the most important one.
I agree UTF-8 will be more important than ISO-2022 in future.
However, I insist
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 01:48:31PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 04:43:12AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> > > I think this change should say something about full screen support.
>
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 09:43:39AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Full screen support? Wha
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 01:12:57PM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think this proposal is too biased to UTF-8.
Sigh. I was afraid this would happen.
> UTF-8 is mere one encoding out of many encodings in the world, though
> it is an important one.
Yes. It is also the future.
ISO-202
Hi,
I think this proposal is too biased to UTF-8.
UTF-8 is mere one encoding out of many encodings in the world, though
it is an important one.
Thus, I propose to add
+ If the terminal emulator supports ISO-2022 encoding,
+ add 10 points.
+ If the terminal emulator
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 04:43:12AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> > I think this change should say something about full screen support.
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 09:43:39AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Full screen support? What does that mean? Maximizable to the size of the
> root window? Works
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 04:43:12AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> I think this change should say something about full screen support.
Full screen support? What does that mean? Maximizable to the size of the
root window? Works well with the "screen" program?
> Otherwise, if 9term were modified suc
I think this change should say something about full screen support.
Otherwise, if 9term were modified such that -T is equivalent to -label,
it would get the highest priority -- but it emulates a printer.
--
Raul
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 03:27:36PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Package: debian
>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +If the terminal emulator supports a command-line option of
> +the form "-e command", where this option causes a
> +new terminal window to appear running command, add
> +10 points.
> +If the terminal emu
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.2.1.2
Severity: wishlist
Rationale: allows for terminal emulators that play nicely with established
standards for command-line behavior to achieve higher priority in the
alternatives system (this has been requested from several parties in the
past); also promotes
9 matches
Mail list logo
