On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 12:28:37PM +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Bill Allombert, 2014-07-30]
> > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:27:51AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > > Would that description be OK:
> > > >
> > > > httpd-wsgi A WSGI capable HTTP server
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 12:19:29PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Bill Allombert (2014-07-30 11:59:38)
> > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:27:51AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >> Bill Allombert wrote:
> >>> Would that description be OK:
> >>>
> >>> httpd-wsgi A WSGI capable H
[Bill Allombert, 2014-07-30]
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:27:51AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > Would that description be OK:
> > >
> > > httpd-wsgi A WSGI capable HTTP server
> > >
> > > Are there other developper maintaining WSGI related packages to
Quoting Bill Allombert (2014-07-30 11:59:38)
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:27:51AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> Bill Allombert wrote:
>>> Would that description be OK:
>>>
>>> httpd-wsgi A WSGI capable HTTP server
>>>
>>> Are there other developper maintaining WSGI related package
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:27:51AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Would that description be OK:
> >
> > httpd-wsgi A WSGI capable HTTP server
> >
> > Are there other developper maintaining WSGI related packages to second
> > this ?
>
> I second the above
Bill Allombert wrote:
> Would that description be OK:
>
> httpd-wsgi A WSGI capable HTTP server
>
> Are there other developper maintaining WSGI related packages to second
> this ?
I second the above description.
I (co-)maintain uwsgi, which is capable of serving HTTP (via Apache2 b
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 08:01:04PM +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Russ Allbery, 2010-07-19]
> > Piotr Ożarowski writes:
> > >> What other implementations of WSGI on the server side are there in
> > >> Debian besides libapache2-mod-wsgi? I want to get a feel for how broad
> > >> the usage of the
[Russ Allbery, 2010-07-19]
> Piotr Ożarowski writes:
> >> What other implementations of WSGI on the server side are there in
> >> Debian besides libapache2-mod-wsgi? I want to get a feel for how broad
> >> the usage of the virtual package would be.
>
> > gunicorn, python-pastescript, python-flup
Piotr Ożarowski writes:
>> What other implementations of WSGI on the server side are there in
>> Debian besides libapache2-mod-wsgi? I want to get a feel for how broad
>> the usage of the virtual package would be.
> gunicorn, python-pastescript, python-flup, python-cherrypy3, etc.
> see http://
> What other implementations of WSGI on the server side are there in Debian
> besides libapache2-mod-wsgi? I want to get a feel for how broad the usage
> of the virtual package would be.
gunicorn, python-pastescript, python-flup, python-cherrypy3, etc.
see http://wsgi.org/wsgi/Servers
--
Piotr O
Stefan Ott writes:
> I would like to suggest a new virtual package, "httpd-wsgi". I'm
> currently in the process of packaging a Pylons-based web-application
> that uses wsgi and instead of manually keeping / updating a list of all
> possible implementations (eg. libapache2-mod-wsgi) it would be v
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.9.0.0
Severity: wishlist
Hi there,
I would like to suggest a new virtual package, "httpd-wsgi". I'm currently in
the process of packaging a Pylons-based web-application that uses wsgi and
instead of manually keeping / updating a list of all possible implementatio
12 matches
Mail list logo
