On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 08:01:04PM +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > [Russ Allbery, 2010-07-19] > > Piotr Ożarowski <pi...@debian.org> writes: > > >> What other implementations of WSGI on the server side are there in > > >> Debian besides libapache2-mod-wsgi? I want to get a feel for how broad > > >> the usage of the virtual package would be. > > > > > gunicorn, python-pastescript, python-flup, python-cherrypy3, etc. > > > see http://wsgi.org/wsgi/Servers > > > > Oh, okay. I was looking at the package descriptions of some of those, but > > I couldn't figure out from that whether they actually provided a web > > server or were just the client glue. > > all packages that provide httpd-wsgi should provide a web server, yes > (python itself is providing one, python-* packages listed above are > using it. I don't think pythonX.Y should provide httpd-wsgi although it > provides wsgiref module in stdlib, though) > > > Is it your expectation that anything providing httpd-wsgi would be a full > > web server (capable of listening on port 80 to regular HTTP traffic, for > > example)? I'm trying to figure out how to write the proposed language. > > yes
To clarify: does installing httpd-wsgi should result in a webserver being up and running at port 80 ? (installing python certainly does not do that). Would that description be OK: httpd-wsgi A WSGI capable HTTP server Are there other developper maintaining WSGI related packages to second this ? Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111128233021.GB5148@yellowpig
