Re: Bug#171221: openmotif: openmotif is not a native package

2002-12-27 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Manoj" == Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Manoj> At some point I hope to identify and extract the parts Manoj> of the packaging manual that describe abstract _interfaces_ Manoj> to the packaging system, and see if that could be Manoj> standardized. Note o

Re: Bug#171221: openmotif: openmotif is not a native package

2002-12-23 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>>"Brendan" == Brendan O'Dea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Brendan> On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 09:46:01AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 06:35:52PM +1100, Brendan O'Dea wrote: >> Personally I prefer to rename the upstream tarball to .orig.tar.gz so it >> is byte-for-byte ident

Bug#171221: openmotif: openmotif is not a native package

2002-12-02 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 11:09:33PM +1100, Brendan O'Dea wrote: > On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 09:46:01AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote: > >On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 06:35:52PM +1100, Brendan O'Dea wrote: > >> Personally I prefer to rename the upstream tarball to .orig.tar.gz so it > >> is byte-for-byte ident

Bug#171221: openmotif: openmotif is not a native package

2002-12-02 Thread Brendan O'Dea
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 09:46:01AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote: >On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 06:35:52PM +1100, Brendan O'Dea wrote: >> Personally I prefer to rename the upstream tarball to .orig.tar.gz so it >> is byte-for-byte identical (although this is technically violating >> current policy which re

Bug#171221: openmotif: openmotif is not a native package

2002-12-02 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 06:35:52PM +1100, Brendan O'Dea wrote: > Personally I prefer to rename the upstream tarball to .orig.tar.gz so it > is byte-for-byte identical (although this is technically violating > current policy which requires it to unpack into a .orig directory). I don't see anywhere

Bug#171221: openmotif: openmotif is not a native package

2002-12-02 Thread Brendan O'Dea
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 11:42:27PM +0100, Gerd Knorr wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 05:24:58PM +0100, Gerd Knorr wrote: >> > >> > "should" or "must"? I can't find anything in the policy saying >> > I *must* package it this way, it just says it is usually done this >> > way. Thus I hereby clos

Processed: Re: Bug#171221: openmotif: openmotif is not a native package

2002-11-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 171221 debian-policy Bug#171221: openmotif: openmotif is not a native package Bug reassigned from package `openmotif' to `debian-policy'. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Re: Bug#171221: openmotif: openmotif is not a native package

2002-11-30 Thread Herbert Xu
reassign 171221 debian-policy quit On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 11:42:27PM +0100, Gerd Knorr wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 05:24:58PM +0100, Gerd Knorr wrote: > > > > > > "should" or "must"? I can't find anything in the policy saying > > > I *must* package it this way, it just says it is usually

Re: Bug#171221: openmotif: openmotif is not a native package

2002-11-30 Thread Gerd Knorr
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 05:24:58PM +0100, Gerd Knorr wrote: > > > > "should" or "must"? I can't find anything in the policy saying > > I *must* package it this way, it just says it is usually done this > > way. Thus I hereby close that bug. > > It is specified in C.3. Well, it is exactly tha

Re: Bug#171221: openmotif: openmotif is not a native package

2002-11-30 Thread Herbert Xu
reopen 171221 quit On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 05:24:58PM +0100, Gerd Knorr wrote: > > "should" or "must"? I can't find anything in the policy saying > I *must* package it this way, it just says it is usually done this > way. Thus I hereby close that bug. It is specified in C.3. > I didn't modify