On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 06:18:50PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 12:00:32PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> > > Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > I do
Hello
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 12:00:32PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I do not really see a problem here. All gnustep packages store
> > files in a (at least sort of) FHS compliant directory:
> > /usr/
is a add-on application.
>
> So, my question is, should GNUstep be removed from Debian ?
>
> Eric
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
- Ola Lundqvist
s. Next would come package
> providing cgi scripts, which could begin to document and link to the new
> urls to the cgi scripts. And then packages that provide "web
> application" content in /var/www would move over to the new set of
> directories, and to providing symlinks to it i
Ola
> --
> see shy jo
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.or
ood as far as I have checked.
Regards,
// Ola
--
--------- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332
o have them.
So I'm not sure I want the static versions removed. It would
then be quite hard to build such programs.
Regards,
// Ola
> --
> James
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
on, version 2 or higher. Prompting the user by other
> means, such as by hand, is now deprecated.
I second this proposal, too.
Regards,
// Ola
> --
> see shy jo
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 11:34:20AM -0800, T. Alexander Popiel wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> If AWT / GUI stuff is a particular problem (which is my understanding),
> >> I t
tually points
> to the AWT-capable JVM if you have several JVMs installed. Though this is
> a slightly different issue.
Yes, that is another issue. :)
Regards,
// Ola
> b.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubs
longer so sure about this.
What do other people think about this issue?
Best regards,
// Ola
> Regards
>
> Grzegorz B. Prokopski
>
> PS: I'll wait to see what other have to say on that topic.
>
> --
> Grzegorz B. Prokopski <[
Hello
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 08:03:56PM +0100, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> W li?cie z nie, 19-01-2003, godz. 17:23, Ola Lundqvist pisze:
*SNIP*
> > >
> > > I searched for "runtime" in Java Policy (as found in java-common
> > > package) and couldn
ut to) be fixed.
> The Java Policy is for us, not the other way.
Agreed too. It is for us, not a specific person.
Regards,
// Ola
> Kind regards
>
> Grzegorz B. Prokopski
>
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +4
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 01:27:20PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Ola> I second this. It is a common and widely accepted license.
Hello.
> Is it? Can we see some numbers, please? My stance on
This time it is gpg signed.
I second this proposal.
Regards,
// Ola
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 12:50:52PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hello
>
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 10:30:57AM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > reassign 173737 debian-policy
> > thanks
> >
>
ed to make a proposal, get two seconds and no objections.
I second this. It is a common and widely accepted license.
Regards,
// Ola
> Thanks.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO
OTECTED] | microscopicsilico-to fit into a single
> or [EMAIL PROTECTED] | volcaniconi- standalone haiku
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
eak things so that is
why I add it as an additional thing) some conflict issues can be
resolved.
Regards,
// Ola
>
>
> regards,
> junichi
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Hi
On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 10:07:47AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>
> > Suggestions are very welcome. And yes before we start that discussion.
> > This is needed because sometimes this kind of things are really
> > a mess.
&g
things are really
a mess.
Regards,
// Ola
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332
t; /usr/share/java/ext as the default such directory.
> --
> --Per Bothner
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bothner.com/per/
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
>
Hi again.
I have not seen very much complains on the policy. Actually none
on fact.
So what further steps should I take in order to make this an
official policy?
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 01:56:15PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> &
'java2' command (not 'java').
* How to handle jar dependencies? Should there be some kind of
mechanism for that?
Best regards,
// Ola
PS. Please continue this thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and not just on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DS.
--
-------
and, California, U.S.A.
> GPG: 433BA087 9C0F 194F 203A 63F7 B1B8 6E5A 8CA3 27DB 433B A087
> EngSoc adopts market economy: cheap is wasteful, efficient is expensive.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
). And, perhaps, CNI headers generated with gcjh.
Well it should depend on the -java package. Generated c headers should be
placed in a -dev package.
Suggestions to the policy is welcome, preferrably as a wishlist to
java-common. Best of course is as a patch.
Regards,
// Ola
--
---
gt; > Stephen
> >
> > "A duck!"
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 10:31:43PM +0200, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> On Sunday 12 May 2002 22:00, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> > On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 09:40:05PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > > I disagree on that class files should be placed in a -dev package for the
> >
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 10:05:55PM +0200, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> On Sunday 12 May 2002 21:32, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 09:13:35PM +0200, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> > > On Sunday 12 May 2002 21:11, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> > > > Only if yo
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 03:10:25PM -0400, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 09:16:37PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Java code is supposed to be
> > portable. If you compile it to machine binaries it is no longer a
> > java program and should not be packaged a
o non-free otherwise.
Well. It is even better to remove this paragraph entirelly. It is clearly
stated in the normal debian policy.
Regards,
// Ola
> Egon
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 02:45:24PM -0400, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 05:41:29PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > http://people.debian.org/~opal/java/policy.html/policy.html
>
> The following,
>
> Both are shipped as Java bytecode (*.class files, pack
Package: java-common
Severity: normal
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 03:11:41PM +, Nic Ferrier wrote:
> Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > When we now have (almost) got woody out of the door I think it
> > is time to give the Propos
/java/policy.html/policy.html
Some of it have to be rewritten so it states that it is no
longer a proposed policy (when it is accepted).
It anyone have comments on it please let me know.
Regards,
// Ola
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED
e so buggy that we refuse to support them, and
> * must meet all policy requirements presented in this manual.
>
>
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
> GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
list without
> me
> having to remember to update it..
Ahh thanks. That is a good way to do it. I'll adopt it right away. For both
java-common and harden-doc. Then I'll get the best from both worlds.
Regards,
// Ola
--
- Ola Lundqvist --
The security part is the one
I found to be most critical. Autobuilders and other people are
a valid reason too. But I think the policy must be more clear at least
to have something to point at when people suggest it in bug-reports
(complaining on not too updated...) :)
R
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 10:28:18PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 10:20:32PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Other checks can be build-dependencies of lynx, omt, ftp and other similar
> > packages. Build dependencies of cvs is maybe a good check too. I
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 11:48:15AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> >
> > Ok. Should this be a lintian check? Test for cvs -d :pserver:...
> > in the rules file?
> >
>
> I can add it if I must. However I would like to trust our developers to not
> be that silly (-:
Hmm I took the idéa from
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 10:38:35AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>
> On 17-Dec-2001 Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I have a question about build time dependencies for
> > a package. The question was rized because I have now included
&g
this
a policy violation?
Regards,
// Ola
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 584 36 LINKÖPING |
| +46 (0)13-17 69 83 +46 (0)70-332 1551
41 matches
Mail list logo
