Hi

Now when woody is released I would like to propose that the
proposed java policy will be official.

Therefore I would like to have comments on it here so things
can be discussed. If you have a additional proposal please
also file a bug against java-common so I can remember it.

There are some things that might want to be added before it
becomes truly official.

See the policy at:
http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/java-policy/

* gcj and how to handle that (should it be mentioned at all?).
* should all virtual machines that provides a java2 virtual machine
  also provide a 'java2' command (not 'java').
* How to handle jar dependencies? Should there be some kind of
  mechanism for that?

Best regards,

// Ola

PS. Please continue this thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and not just on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DS.

-- 
 --------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/  [EMAIL PROTECTED]                     Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11   \
|  [EMAIL PROTECTED]                 584 36 LINKÖPING         |
|  +46 (0)13-17 69 83                  +46 (0)70-332 1551       |
|  http://www.opal.dhs.org             UIN/icq: 4912500         |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36  4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
 ---------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to