might have privately replyed, but in this
case i'd like the answare to be sent here for logging too.
thanks,
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][A-Za-z\-]*[iy]'\?s$ | as fine or rude sentences have
Luca, a wannabe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The fact that i'm not writing mails does not imply that i agree: i'm simply
waiting reply to questions i would have asked. Indeed you've at least two
seconds to this proposal, but there are still uncovered issue
ate it with the clean target of
debian/rules is dirty trick and is not in the meaning of the target.
ciao,
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][A-Za-z\-]*[iy]'\?s$ | as fine or rude sentences have
Luca, a wannabe ``Good guy
a new tag in
debian/control, implementing debian/rules.version or any other proposal.
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][A-Za-z\-]*[iy]'\?s$ | as fine or rude sentences have
Luca, a wannabe ``Good guy''.
n another patch, not a solution. The point
here is that our sources are becoming more complex each day. We cant go on
with patches for long.
ciao,
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][A-Za-z\-]*[iy]'\?s$ |
ebian/interface could be a file in which we describe the interface
implemented by each component (object) of the source package.
$ cat debian/interface
rules: , , ...
control: , , ...
...
ciao,
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-
packages shareing a common license might consider to have a
leader package installing their common license under /usr/share/common-license
> I think this proposal is a bad idea.
I hope it's better now.
ciao,
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as
when a license can
be considered common in Debian.
I propose to consider common any license that is used by more than X (i
suggest X to be 15) absolute number of actively maintained source packages.
Licenses that are referenced by less than X-Y (i suggest Y to be 3) source
packages, are entitled t
7;ll modify this bug soon.
ciao,
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][A-Za-z\-]*[iy]'\?s$ | as fine or rude sentences have
Luca, a wannabe ``Good guy''. | something in commo
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 03:42:13PM +0100, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
[...]
Sorry, I meant to send that mail to -python, but i used the wrong alias :P
ciao,
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][-A-Za-z]*[iy]&
#x27;ll propose the changes to the
upstream.
ciao,
P.S.: I'm considering the opportunity to package ZEO for zope. Do you think i
should go on?
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][-A-Za-z]*[iy]'?s$ | as fine or rude
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 02:43:30AM +1100, Steve Kowalik wrote:
> At 2:20 am, Sunday, February 9 2003, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis mumbled:
> I personally think in cases such as alsa-driver and libc6, where you have
> the list and all the people who upload the package on one
differences among people working on some package.
ciao,
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][-A-Za-z]*[iy]'?s$ | as fine or rude sentences have
Infinite loop: see `Loop, infinite'.| something in common: they
Loop
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 12:48:33AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 10:57:48PM +0100, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis
> wrote:
> >
> >
>
> URI schemes are not to be used as a means of expressing the purpose of
> the URI.
I was refering to wik
ols in Description: field like:
Or whatever.
These may easily be parsed and used on packages.debian.org.
What about this?
ciao,
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][-A-Za-z]*[iy]'?s$ | as fine or rude sentences have
om to
> ; as opposed to the change from
> to plus a field for URIs>. The latter is much less intrusive.
I would prefer the first, even if it is more intrusive. IMHO an URI
filed does not make sense in the package control file, and formatting a source
of information (like the copyright
t file can be
extracted from the binary packages. Give the copiright file 4 trivial tags, and
I'll be hapy to play with them for you.
Packaged:
Upstream-Authors:
Upstream-URI:
Copyright:
Easy to check, change, extract from binary packages... why not?
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De
tion as the copyright
notice; we obviously cannot include the copyright notice in the package
control file.
My proposal to give a format to the copyright file still stand.
This could be the first step, and then we can figure out how to bring this to
the users trough dselect etc.
ciao,
--
Luc
s not to have the same frequency. With
this sentence i'm not blaming anyone for this. My offer still stands, even if
i suppose i'd contact Randolph Chung first.
ciao,
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][
o me, this demonstrate one of the property of `make', and, at the same time,
the fact that with do not have to use only `make', thanks to simple interface.
Why do not give me an interface, and let me to use whatever i like?
ciao,
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant o
at the election period is over: you were quite friendly.
ciao,
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][A-Za-z\-]*[iy]'\?s$ | as fine or rude sentences have
Luca, a wannabe ``Good guy''.
cy rocks, and that task may be accomplished be any
developer, so the only way i can demonstrate it is doing.
ciao,
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][A-Za-z\-]*[iy]'\?s$ | as fine or rude sentences have
Luca, a wannabe ``
eliberately use command -v in my maintainer scripts.
Change the rules for all the Debian distribution because you find that
'command -v' is handy, seems quite excessive to me...
ciao,
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A
ocs >/dev/null
2>&1; then
postinst-suid: if command -v suidregister >/dev/null 2>&1 && [ -e
/etc/suid.conf ]; then
postrm-suid: command -v suidunregister >/dev/null 2>&1; then
prerm-doc-base: command -v install-docs >/dev/null 2>&1; then
The same go
is about
freedom. We like open source because it's freedom, it lets you to choose: what
if we decide to change to.. rpm? Should we ever achive a sort of consensus on
this, a packaging tool independent policy would not need to be changed. Of
course, rpm is an example :)
ciao,
--
Luca - De W
is mail can be a starting point :)
ciao,
- Forwarded message from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
From: Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-project@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging
practice
26 matches
Mail list logo
