Hi,
Le 08/09/2017 à 07:44, Simon McVittie a écrit :
> On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 at 16:10:44 +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
>> when upstream tarballs need to be repacked because they contain non-dfsg
>> free data appending '+dfsg' to the upstream version seems common
>> practice.
[…]
> It's a coincidence th
Hi,
Le 08/01/2017 à 09:42, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> […] the Format
> URI for the current copyright-format document is actually a redirect.
Nitpicking: it’s actually not a real redirect. Fetching it directly
(e.g., using wget) works via plain HTTP.
Regards.
David
signature.asc
Description: O
Hi,
[ Charles, please keep some relevant context when replying to a bug
report, “bts -m show ##” can help. ]
Le 18/04/2015 02:25, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> regarding the tag "missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright", I think, like
> Martin, that it should not be triggered by multi-lin
Hi,
Le 03/04/2015 19:25, Martin Erik Werner a écrit :
> I'm seeing this same warning without the back-reference to header, for
> example this copyright file:
>
> ###
> Format: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
> Upstream-Name: td
> Source: http://example.com
> Lic
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:57:57PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> dpkg 1.17.11 and apt 1.0.7 recently implemented support for versioned
> provides.
[…]
> This clearly needs an update. No proposed wording yet, sorry.
Here is a simple one, stripping away the incorrect restriction. The
consideration abou
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
taffit pushed a change to branch master
in repository developers-reference.
from 9a6f361 German po4a translation: Review by Erik Pfannenstein
new 6fbf9ac Update French translation
new afa2132 tidypo: C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Le 30/07/2014 06:11, Fabien Givors a écrit :
> I recenctly tried to debcheckout developers-reference, it failed and noticed a
> typo in the Vcs-GIT field.
It looks like the migration was made in a hurry without considering:
- - at least inform
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Le 22/01/2014 19:15, Paul Wise a écrit :
> Please add Steam subscriptions to the list of goodies offered to Debian
> Developers,
As additional data, I’ve seen comments on IRC today pointing it may not
be such a good idea to incite DD to instal
Package: debian-policy
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi,
Policy 4.11 advertise DEHS while the “DEHS service is dead since August
2011.” [0]
0: https://wiki.debian.org/DEHS
Regards
David
From 635b679d09b9eafabaa9a20747fce865d6ff50fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?David=20Pr=C3=A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Le 10/07/2013 19:06, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> I note that /doc was only to be served locally. How did that cause security
> issues ?
- if some front-end server on the same host forwards connections to
an apache2 backend server on the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Le 16/09/2012 21:16, Paul Wise a écrit :
>
> -Moving, removing, renaming, adopting, and orphaning packages
> +Moving, removing, reintroducing, renaming, adopting, and orphaning
> packages
>
I guess “reintroducing” should be the last item o
Le 27/08/2012 11:24, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> Charles Plessy writes:
>
>> I just figured out that Defconf's escape capability is not mentionned in
>> the spec. Here is a small patch to correct this.
>
> Seconded.
>
>> From: Charles Plessy
>> Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 22:19:30 +0900
>> Subject: [P
Package: developers-reference
Version: 3.4.9
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
As discussed on #d-release, the version scheme advice could be improved,
so should the distribution declared in changelog, for the testing and
{old,}stable upload (including the -security ones), in order to have
only on
Hi Chris, Hideki,
Le 08/08/2012 21:48, David Prévot a écrit :
> I'd be happy to poke translators
And here I am, could you please update your translation in order to push
the last up to date version in the upcoming Wheezy?
> po4a/po/de.po: 1319 translated messages, 22 fuzzy tran
Hi,
Le 09/07/2012 03:31, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> Thanks, applied with minor tweaks. (And I dropped some supplementary
> uninteresting information)
A few strings needs to be updated in translations too, I'd be happy to
poke translators and take care of a team upload as soon as the
translation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Control: tags -1 pending
Le 01/07/2012 04:44, Jakub Wilk a écrit :
> $ zcat developers-reference.txt.gz | grep Freenode
> key in the Debian keyring. Please see Freenodes documentation for
>
> It should be s/Freenodes/Freenode/.
Thanks Jakub,
Hi,
Le 15/04/2012 08:18, Osamu Aoki a écrit :
> I just fixed this bug in subversion for developers-reference
Thanks, please note that the interoperability problem of frenchb.ldf and
xeCJK.sty part of the issue has been fixed in the mean time, see #668562.
> Who will be uploading this package.
Le 12/03/2012 13:44, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 01:56:17AM +0100, Carsten Hey wrote:
>> […] how a possible mechanism to let users choose between "always prefer
>> free packages" and "follow the maintainer's recommendation, even it
>> a non-free package is preferred" could
Le 03/03/2012 06:10, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> Le Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 08:21:31PM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit :
>> David Prévot writes:
>>
>>> There is something else I didn't thought earlier: with the conversion
>>> from DebianDoc to DocBook, the HTML pages
Hi,
Le 02/03/2012 23:43, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> Russ Allbery writes:
>
>> First, I plan on releasing 3.9.3.1 next week
Thanks for the reminder.
> debian-www folks, this version will have upgrading-checklist.html in the
> policy.html directory. I believe this is a better document to publish
reassign 659070 developers-reference
thanks
Hi Luca,
Thanks for your report, it looks like a known issue not yet documented.
Le 07/02/2012 21:09, Luca Capello a écrit :
> The internal links on the French version of the developers-reference
> point to the English pages or, better, to the pages w
Le 13/01/2012 22:54, Osamu Aoki a écrit :
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 09:41:10AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:42:12 +0900
>> Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Japanese PDF:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~taffit/developers-reference-xetex/developers-reference.ja.pdf
>> Most of
tags 629530 pending
thanks.
Hi,
Le 09/01/2012 12:49, David Prévot a écrit :
>> Le 07/06/2011 08:56, Osamu Aoki a écrit :
>>> If you move this build this with XeTeX (specifically xelatex), this
>>> problem goes away.
>
> Indeed, I just rebuilt it with
Le 10/01/2012 03:26, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> On Mon, 09 Jan 2012, David Prévot wrote:
>> As you may have noticed, the English document looks different: I quickly
>> copied and pasted part of the maint-guide build system
> Why did you have to do this change? Was it not e
with XeTeX and it works:
http://people.debian.org/~taffit/developers-reference-xetex/developers-reference.pdf
Le 08/06/2011 13:13, David Prévot a écrit :
> Lucas, Raphaël, could we consider moving away of pdflatex build? This
> may allow to build the Japanese PDF, which would also be an improvement.
Source: developers-reference
Version: 3.4.6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: l10n patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
The developers reference currently documents two ways to unfuzzy
translations [1]. msguntypot offers an easy way to do the job, please
document it instead. The atta
Le 26/12/2011 22:19, David Prévot a écrit :
> Le 26/11/2011 03:27, Charles Plessy a écrit :
>> For the text version, I am not sure how necessary it is.
>> […] not distributing [the text version] at all [is] also valid option
> CCing debian-policy, in case someone has an op
Le 26/12/2011 14:46, Russ Allbery a écrit :
>> Ben Finney writes:
>>> Attached is a patch that simply incorporates the useful content from
>>> ‘mime-policy’ into the main ‘policy’ document, and removes the
>>> redundant document.
> And this patch has now been applied. Sorry about the long delay
tags 649811 patch
thanks...
Le 26/11/2011 03:27, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> Le Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:31:58PM -0400, David Prévot a écrit :
> In your patch, only one version is expected.
Thanks for spotting that, the purpose was indeed to get all available
versions.
>> Attac
Hi,
CCing debian-www since we may be of little help here, but not tagging
the bug as “affects www.debian.org” yet, since Russ first proposal
doesn't need anything on our side.
Le 25/12/2011 13:58, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> Charles Plessy writes:
>> Having nice HTML links from the upgrade checkli
On 20/11/2011 22:04, David Prévot wrote:
> Hi,
Ooops, I replied on a wrong list, sorry for the noise.
Regards
David
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
On 02/11/2011 11:17, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> As you might have noticed, I send some mails. Let's first see, if we
> can reach a consensus, let's say... by the end of the week.
Alexander, you wrote this message two weeks ago, is there any chance you
could try and help us find a wa
Hi,
Le 22/10/2011 10:57, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> Le Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 06:27:15PM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
>>
>> So I propose to do the following, in line with the other propositions.
>>
>> a) Apply the attached patch to point at
>> http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyrig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Le 27/09/2011 21:17, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> Charles Plessy writes:
>> Le Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 05:45:02PM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
>>> The advantage of instead using:
>>>
>>> http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-form
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Le 26/09/2011 12:05, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> Bill Allombert writes:
>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 09:31:47AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
>>> I think that we need to resolve #640737 first. The most frequently
>>> proposed URL,
>>> ‘http://www
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 09/06/2011 08:23, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> On Wed, 08 Jun 2011, David Prévot wrote:
>> […] it
>> could be a good time to extract the content from the latest package than
>> building the Subversion version on www-maste
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Le 07/06/2011 08:56, Osamu Aoki a écrit :
> TeX backend (specifically pdflatex) used to create this PDF is the
> cause.
>
> If you move this build this with XeTeX (specifically xelatex), this
> problem goes away.
Thanks for spotting the err
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 22/04/2011 03:11, Chris Leick a écrit :
> When I'm opening this page,
I guess that you are referring to the German index [1].
1: http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/index.de.html
> I can see the content in german, but all
> links r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
tags 623489 pending
thanks
Hi,
Le 20/04/2011 13:53, Chris Leick a écrit :
> I've added the german translation of the developer's reference to the
> SVN repository.
That's great, thanks.
> Please activate this language.
I fixed the build errors
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.9.1.0
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi,
freedesktop.org URL in the Policy are moved permanently. The following
patch solve this issue.
Regards
David
diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
index 642f672..a6bc73c 100644
--- a/policy.sgml
+++ b/policy.sgml
@@ -894
Please find attached the patch from Nicolas François updated to the new
DocBook source format.
Index: debian/changelog
===
--- debian/changelog (révision 7379)
+++ debian/changelog (révision 7380)
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@
* Update outda
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear maintainer of developers-reference and Debian translators.
After asking, Lucas proposed to sponsor an upload of the
developers-reference, that will close plenty of bugs already pending in
the Subversion repository.
I just asked the Japanese tran
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
severity 601408 wishlist
thanks
Le 25/10/2010 16:05, anatoly a écrit :
> Package: developers-reference
> Severity: important
Tagging “important” a wishlist bug won't make it resolved quickly.
Providing a patch might...
> UNRELEASED is not listed amo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 13/07/2010 20:47, Nick Andrik a écrit :
> Last phrase in 5.12:
>
> Conversely, it *it* a bad idea to keep a package with only the mailing
> list address as a Maintainer and no Uploaders.
Thanks for noticing, it is corrected.
Cheers
David
-B
I managed to make a mistake in my previous "two word" patch, sorry for
the noise.
Cheers
David
diff -ur /mnt/donnees/1/debian/trans/dev-ref//resources.dbk dev-ref/resources.dbk
--- /mnt/donnees/1/debian/trans/dev-ref//resources.dbk 2010-06-20 09:22:53.112984447 -0400
+++ dev-ref/resources.dbk 20
tags 585161 patch
thanks
Hi,
Developer's reference maintainers, please feel free to confirm the
issue, and approve this patch if it is correct, I'm willing to upload it
and synchronize the French version at the same time if (and only if)
this patch is OK for you.
Cheers
David
diff -ur /mnt/don
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.8.4.0
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
Policy often refers to "Debianised source", but one time, it is used
with a "z" instead of the "s", one time it is used without the first
capital letter, and another time is used a derivative word
("debianisation") without
Package: developers-reference
Version: 3.4.3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
While updating the French translation of the Developer's Reference
(currently reviewed on debian-l10n-fre...@l.d.o), I noticed that part of
the last paragraph about "NMUs and debian/changelog" might be obsolete.
When
Le 03/05/2010 16:19, Don Armstrong a écrit :
> On Mon, 03 May 2010, David Prévot wrote:
>> In order to include upstream changelog distributed in HTML, and convert
>> it as a plain text changelog.gz, policy should advise the use of
>> html2txt (which debhelper already depends
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.8.4.0
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
In order to include upstream changelog distributed in HTML, and convert
it as a plain text changelog.gz, policy should advise the use of
html2txt (which debhelper already depends on) rather than lynx that has
fewer chance
Package: developers-reference
Version: 3.4.3
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi,
While updating the French translation of the Developer's Reference
(currently reviewed on debian-l10n-fre...@l.d.o), I noticed a few
outdated mentions. Please find attached a patch on the svn version.
Cheers
David
--
51 matches
Mail list logo