On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 09:08:18PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Would anybody object to Roger patch being applied without the reference to
> /run/shm, and leave this particular topic to another bug report ?
> Beside, I attach an alternative patch by Thomas Hood that I found in the
> log but whic
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Michael Biebl wrote:
> At the current state, I'm not for adding /run/shm to debian-policy.
> If we can get wider acceptance of this feature (cross-distro), then my
> position
> on this might change. Atm this looks like a Debian-only feature with no real
> use-case why we need
* Charles Plessy , 2011-11-29, 09:07:
In addition, the copyright file must say where the upstream
- sources (if any) were obtained. It should name the original
- authors of the package and the Debian maintainer(s) who were
- involved with its creation.
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 09:07:02AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:33:05AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> >
> >
> > In addition, the copyright file must say where the upstream
> > - sources (if any) were obtained. It should name the original
> > -
Le Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:33:05AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
>
>
> In addition, the copyright file must say where the upstream
> - sources (if any) were obtained. It should name the original
> - authors of the package and the Debian maintainer(s) who were
> -
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 01:28:30PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 09:52:57PM -0600, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 11:55:20AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> >
> > > According to apt-file, prohibiting to install files into /lib64 and
> > > /usr/lib64
>
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:07:53AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 08:33:12PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> >> [java{,2}-compiler]
> >> - default-jdk. If used in an alternative in Build-Depends{,-Indep} then
> >> pick
> >> one of the options (T
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 08:01:04PM +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Russ Allbery, 2010-07-19]
> > Piotr Ożarowski writes:
> > >> What other implementations of WSGI on the server side are there in
> > >> Debian besides libapache2-mod-wsgi? I want to get a feel for how broad
> > >> the usage of the
Le Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:17:36PM +0100, Bill Allombert a écrit :
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:01:17AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> >
> > I would like to propose to apply the following patches, and after this to
> > call for either reporting new issues or declaring the DEP accepted.
>
> As I u
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 02:19:34PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I've committed the below patch to the dep repo on svn.debian.org.
>
> === modified file 'web/deps/dep5.mdwn'
> --- old/web/deps/dep5.mdwn2011-11-11 15:27:02 +
> +++ new/web/deps/dep5.mdwn2011-11-25 20:15:33 +
> @@ -1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #debian-policy (3.9.3.0) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * copyright-format: Clarify specification of multiple license exception:
> #Wording: Steve Langasek
> #Seconded: Craig Small
> #Seconded: Gregor Herrmann
> #Seconded: Jak
Bill Allombert writes:
> For example upgrading automake to 1.11 will activate terse log by
> default without notice, so the developpers are in the painful situation
> to have to disable a feature they never wanted to activate in the first
> place.
I'm fairly certain this is not the case. That w
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:37:41AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Bill Allombert writes:
>
> > Most packages will only provide verbose log, so it is rather terse logs
> > that are optionnal. So maybe the option should be
> > DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=terse.
>
> I agree with this. Most packages are alread
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:01:17AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
> usertags 649674 informative
> tag 649674 patch
> usertags 649679 normative issue
> thanks
>
> Le Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:26:33PM +0100, Bill Allombert a écrit :
> >
> > As I said previously,
BTW, my alternative patch was intended only to improve the wording,
not to change the import. I hope I succeeded (in improving it) and,
if so, that you'll accept the improvement.
Cheers,
--
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscri
Bill Allombert (28/11/2011):
> I suppose we want the autobuilders to generate verbose log, but I am not
> sure if we want the autobuilders to use a non-empty DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS
> (and whether we can).
>
> It is unfortunately possible than a typo in debian/rules only trigger if
> DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 09:08:18PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 05:50:52PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > Am 08.06.2011 23:22, schrieb Bill Allombert:
> > > Hello Cyril and Michael,
> > >
> > > Are you willing to resecond this as the final version ?
> >
> >
> > At the
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 05:50:52PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 08.06.2011 23:22, schrieb Bill Allombert:
> > Hello Cyril and Michael,
> >
> > Are you willing to resecond this as the final version ?
>
>
> At the current state, I'm not for adding /run/shm to debian-policy.
> If we can get wid
Bill Allombert writes:
> Most packages will only provide verbose log, so it is rather terse logs
> that are optionnal. So maybe the option should be
> DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=terse.
I agree with this. Most packages are already doing the right thing, and I
think terse logs should be the non-default op
Some minor corrections for those patches:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 at 00:01:17 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> Example header paragraph
> -Format:
> +Format:
> http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/;
> Upstream-Name: SOFTware
Should
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
Setting user to debian-pol...@packages.debian.org (was ple...@debian.org).
> usertags 649674 informative
Bug#649674: [copyright-format] Proofreading of the examples.
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are n
user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
usertags 649674 informative
tag 649674 patch
usertags 649679 normative issue
thanks
Le Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:26:33PM +0100, Bill Allombert a écrit :
>
> As I said previously, my plan was to upload 3.9.3 as soon as the DEP issues
> are resolved.
> Unfortun
On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 07:54:43PM +0100, Robert Luberda wrote:
> Charles Plessy writes:
>
> Hi,
> >
> > Dear Robert (maintainer of doc-base) and everybody,
> >
> > I have proposed the patch below to the Debian Policy in August this year, to
> > stop recommending the direct use of install-docs f
* Charles Plessy , 2011-11-28, 16:11:
it seems to me that the best way to materialise a consensus for a
release goal is to actually get it listed in
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/goals.txt and have the work started.
Matthias has already proposed it as RG, and he was redirected here:
http:/
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #debian-policy (3.9.3.0) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * Policy 9.10: No more recommend to call install-docs for doc-base.
> #Wording: Charles Plessy
> #Seconded: Robert Luberda
> #Seconded: Raphael Hertzog
> #Closes: #637614
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 10:57:29AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Dear Policy maintainers,
>
> the 3.9.2 release happened last April, and since then 9 bugs were closed,
> about
> syntax of control files, japanese fonts, the machine-readable copyright file
> format, and the Perl and Motif policies
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 01:58:31AM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Disclaimer: the below is a half-baked long-term proposal for a process
> change. If you're wondering about how to do useful work today, please
> ignore it. But comments welcome.
>
> Hi,
>
> My experience has been that the policy
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 04:39:33AM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > * Jonathan Nieder , 2011-11-26, 18:37:
>
> [...]
> >> I do not suspect there is a
> >> consensus for this.
> >
> > Why do you think there is not?
>
> I was guessing, it seems incorrectly, based on the lack of
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> For reference dpkg supports "DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=maintainer-build"
[...]
> I also think that it would be more convenient to have the buildd set the
> verbose mode and others to have the silent rules by default but I don't
> think this is going to take traction. We have quite
29 matches
Mail list logo
