On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:01:17AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
> usertags 649674 informative
> tag 649674 patch
> usertags 649679 normative issue
> thanks
> 
> Le Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:26:33PM +0100, Bill Allombert a écrit :
> > 
> > As I said previously, my plan was to upload 3.9.3 as soon as the DEP issues 
> > are resolved.
> > Unfortunately the DEP-related issues are becoming confusing.
> 
> Thanks for the clarification.
> 
> I am sorry for the mess around the DEP.  I know I share the responsability for
> it.  But let's take an optimistic point of view: there are no major blocker
> reported, and the recent resolution of #633797 shows that we can cooperate and
> converge on a consensus when tackling new issues.
> 
> So I would like to propose to apply the following patches, and after this to
> call for either reporting new issues or declaring the DEP accepted.

As I understand, Steve maintains a VCS repository for DEP5 already. How can we
improve the synergy ? Having two repositories for the same document might lead
to confusion.

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <ballo...@debian.org>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111128211736.GH26059@yellowpig

Reply via email to