Bug#622263: debian-policy: Phrasing of 5.6.25 (DMUA) is confusing

2011-06-07 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 16:54 +0200, Didier Raboud wrote: > We just had a short discussion on IRC (#debian-python, 2011-04-11) about the > phrasing of the new 5.6.25 paragraph (which documents the DMUA field). > > The current phrasing makes it sound that adding the DM-Upload-Allowed field > to each

Bug#622263: debian-policy: Phrasing of 5.6.25 (DMUA) is confusing

2011-06-07 Thread Bill Allombert
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 04:54:04PM +0200, Didier Raboud wrote: > Hi dear policy maintainers, > > We just had a short discussion on IRC (#debian-python, 2011-04-11) about the > phrasing of the new 5.6.25 paragraph (which documents the DMUA field). > > The current phrasing makes it sound that addin

Bug#629530: developers-reference: PDF code example has wrong U+2019 for '

2011-06-07 Thread Osamu Aoki
Package: developers-reference Version: 3.4.4 Severity: minor If I copy script example under "6.5. CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT . . ." from PDF: | 4. Modify all PO files by using sed. The use of that command is recommended over any text editor |to guarantee that the files encoding will not be bro

Bug#604397: Request for TC to rule on a course of action for supporting build-arch

2011-06-07 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Steve Langasek Hi, | 4) Turn on direct use of 'debian/rules build-arch' on the autobuilders for | all packages in unstable and experimental immediately, with no fallback | if the target does not exist; requires a corresponding update to Policy | and mass updates to fix packages t

Bug#604397: debian-policy: require build-arch and build-indep targets

2011-06-07 Thread Bill Allombert
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 01:02:04AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 09:39:59AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > One thought I had today was what will happen with packages using > > > either cdbs or dh. Both of these provide build-arch and build-indep > > > rules, and as a r

Bug#604397: debian-policy: require build-arch and build-indep targets

2011-06-07 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 09:39:59AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > One thought I had today was what will happen with packages using > > either cdbs or dh. Both of these provide build-arch and build-indep > > rules, and as a result both can build using those targets today > > (though individual pa

Bug#604397: debian-policy: require build-arch and build-indep targets

2011-06-07 Thread Bill Allombert
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 11:34:43PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 09:15:41PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > Hi, > > > > That's true but so is it for any new feature unfortunately. And even with > > a flag day, once you have fixed the FTBFS, you're far from having benefits >

Bug#604397: Request for TC to rule on a course of action for supporting build-arch

2011-06-07 Thread Bill Allombert
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 04:02:36PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Bill, > > (Sending this to 629...@bugs.debian.org, which is the cloned bug actually > assigned to the TC...) > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 12:06:18AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > The proposal 3) (which is implemented in dpkg a