On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 16:54 +0200, Didier Raboud wrote:
> We just had a short discussion on IRC (#debian-python, 2011-04-11) about the
> phrasing of the new 5.6.25 paragraph (which documents the DMUA field).
>
> The current phrasing makes it sound that adding the DM-Upload-Allowed field
> to each source package is required (where AFAIK it isn't).
Hmmm. My reading of the dak code suggests that it *is* required each
time. For instance, daklib/queue.py contains:
r = get_newest_source(self.pkg.changes["source"], session)
[...]
if not r.dm_upload_allowed:
rej = "Source package %s does not have 'DM-Upload-Allowed: yes' in its most
recent version (%s)" % (self.pkg.changes["source"], r.version)
self.rejects.append(rej)
and from dbconn.py:
source.dm_upload_allowed = (u.pkg.dsc.get("dm-upload-allowed", '') == "yes")
The wording for the GR which established the DM process
(<URL:http://www.debian.org/vote/2007/vote_003>) also explicitly says
"the most recent version [...] includes the field "DM-Upload-Allowed:
yes" [...] lists the uploader in the Maintainer: or Uploaders: fields"
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/1307475510.1442.8.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
