On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 09:39:59AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > One thought I had today was what will happen with packages using > > either cdbs or dh. Both of these provide build-arch and build-indep > > rules, and as a result both can build using those targets today > > (though individual packages may of course be broken if they did > > things in the wrong rules). However, each would require updating > > individually to actually enable their use. Autodetection here would > > prevent the need for this.
> It would not. Currently autobuilder always only install Build-Depends, so > 'debian/rules build' has to work with only Build-Depends installed. > This means there has basically two cases for package having > build-arch/build-indep: > a) Packages do not have Build-Depends-Indep. > b) Packages have Build-Depends-Indep but the documentation is built in > binary-indep > instead of build-indep. > To get any advantage from this proposal, packages a) need to be changed to > have a proper Build-Depends-Indep line. Packages b) already provides the > split anyway. There are two benefits of this intended change: avoiding the downloading and installation of heavy build-dependencies only needed for generation of architecture-independent packages; and avoiding the build-time generation of those architecture-independent packages. Existing packages that have properly structured their debian/rules targets already for the second case would get immediate benefit from autodetection, with no further changes. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
