On Wed, 14 May 2003 00:36:58 +0200
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Don't you think it would be nice if they could be used for both?
> > (After all, application icons on a panel are menus in their own
> > right.)
>
> The menu manual is not supposed to comment on such things.
I'm just
On Tue, 13 May 2003 18:29:57 -0400
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David B Harris wrote:
> > (Note that I'm subscribed to the list, no need to mail me
> > personally.)
> >
> > On Tue, 13 May 2003 15:58:49 -0500
> > John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:30:
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 05:47:15PM -0400, David B Harris wrote:
> On Tue, 13 May 2003 23:03:02 +0200
> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I know at least two dozen people who use 48x48 icons, even though
> > > they're not in the menu. (They're in a panel or somesuch.)
> >
> > This doc
Bill Allombert wrote:
> Here an extract from the menu manual:
>
> Debian package maintainers should ensure that any icons they include
> for use in the debian menus conform to the following points:
>
> 1. The icons should be in xpm format.
>
> 2. The icons may not be larg
David B Harris wrote:
> (Note that I'm subscribed to the list, no need to mail me personally.)
>
> On Tue, 13 May 2003 15:58:49 -0500
> John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:30:10PM -0400, David B Harris wrote:
> > > Instead of adjusting this to "48x48" to match cu
On Tue, 13 May 2003 23:03:02 +0200
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I know at least two dozen people who use 48x48 icons, even though
> > they're not in the menu. (They're in a panel or somesuch.)
>
> This document apply onlys to icons in /usr/lib/menu for application
> menu. Icons sp
(Note that I'm subscribed to the list, no need to mail me personally.)
On Tue, 13 May 2003 15:58:49 -0500
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:30:10PM -0400, David B Harris wrote:
> > Instead of adjusting this to "48x48" to match current common
> > practise, upping
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:30:10PM -0400, David B Harris wrote:
> On Tue, 13 May 2003 21:56:35 +0200
> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2. The icons may not be larger than 32x32 pixels, although
> > smaller sizes are ok.
> >
> > To accomodate with current workspace size, we
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:30:10PM -0400, David B Harris wrote:
> Instead of adjusting this to "48x48" to match current common practise,
> upping it to 128x128 will give us a bit more leeway.
Why not just use SVG and eliminate the whole problem?
On Tue, 13 May 2003 21:56:35 +0200
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2. The icons may not be larger than 32x32 pixels, although
> smaller sizes are ok.
>
> To accomodate with current workspace size, we could eventually
> change size in point 2 to 48x48.
I know at least two do
Hello debian-policy,
Here an extract from the menu manual:
Debian package maintainers should ensure that any icons they include
for use in the debian menus conform to the following points:
1. The icons should be in xpm format.
2. The icons may not be larger than 32x32 pi
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 07:15:04AM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 03:25:00AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 09:13:05PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 01:25:52AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:20
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 03:25:00AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 09:13:05PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> > On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 01:25:52AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:20:03AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > > > If there is a checklist for qu
13 matches
Mail list logo
