On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 05:47:15PM -0400, David B Harris wrote: > On Tue, 13 May 2003 23:03:02 +0200 > Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I know at least two dozen people who use 48x48 icons, even though > > > they're not in the menu. (They're in a panel or somesuch.) > > > > This document apply onlys to icons in /usr/lib/menu for application > > menu. Icons specifically designed for use with an application (window > > manager, file manager) can be of any size. > > Don't you think it would be nice if they could be used for both? (After > all, application icons on a panel are menus in their own right.)
The menu manual is not supposed to comment on such things. > 32x32 is *huge* in a menu, and 48x48 is insane. At least for common use > today :) If it's going to be changed, there has to be the basic What is the resolution of your screen ? > assumption that the Right Thing(tm) will be done, either via dynamic > resizing on the part of the menu app, or conversion in the menu method > (the latter will always work). Otherwise, it needs to be left as-is. OK, I will keep the 32x32 limit. I am more interested about discussing the 8 bit display stuff, anyway. Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here.
