On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:30:10PM -0400, David B Harris wrote: > Instead of adjusting this to "48x48" to match current common practise, > upping it to 128x128 will give us a bit more leeway.
Why not just use SVG and eliminate the whole problem?
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:30:10PM -0400, David B Harris wrote: > Instead of adjusting this to "48x48" to match current common practise, > upping it to 128x128 will give us a bit more leeway.
Why not just use SVG and eliminate the whole problem?