Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Anyway, here's a typical case.
> $ apt-cache show flightgear
> ...
> Description: Flight Gear Flight Simulator
> Flight Gear is a free and highly sophisticated flight simulator.
> .
> This package contains the runtime binaries.
This description sucks. Adding an url to it w
On Mar 23, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>inetd-superserver, already planned by the *-inetd cospiracy effort.
>
>For the transition, I will make the next netbase package provide
>inetd-superserver until /usr/sbin/update-inetd will be moved
>somewhere else.
Thinking again about it, I
>> On Sun, 23 Mar 2003 21:13:33 +0100,
>> Martin Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 13:18:10 -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>> From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> > If it will depend on inetd-superserv
Your message dated Sun, 23 Mar 2003 13:09:31 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#185943: debian-policy: request for virtual package:
internet-server
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
>> On Sun, 23 Mar 2003 14:20:50 +0100,
>> Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Mar 23, Martin Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Will inetd-superserver provide both, the super-server and
>> update-inetd? Or will inetd-superserver provide the super-server
>> only, and I have to chec
On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 03:17:54PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What does dh_testroot solve in the clean target? Seriously.
> > I've never understood why people put it in.
> It gives a slightly more understandable error message, that's all.
W
Would you like to increase your cell phone signal by
300%?
http://213.162.130.26/1/index.php?r=hsack";>
push here
awiim
mjqw vn tfj jx tuhbdfhm kq y
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-policy
Module name:debian-policy
Changes by: joy Sun Mar 23 10:38:29 MST 2003
Modified files:
. : policy.sgml
Log message:
formatting fixes; created another administrivia section with a list of links
to external sub-policies and the
Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 11:10:58PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Why? because they support building packages as root when
> > dh_testroot can solve a lot of headache ?
Ye gods! Removing dh_testroot does not break the build-as-root case!
> What d
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-policy
Module name:debian-policy
Changes by: joy Sun Mar 23 09:51:40 MST 2003
Modified files:
. : policy.sgml
Log message:
various formatting fixes
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-policy
Module name:debian-policy
Changes by: joy Sun Mar 23 08:55:08 MST 2003
Modified files:
. : policy.sgml
debian : changelog
Log message:
fixed the link to the authors section, closes: #185985
Sorry for my wrong response to this bug report. I'm not going to send
any further followups to bug reports, except for ones that I either
submitted or for packages that I'm responsibel for me. This was the last
public answer to an bugreport that I haven't any relation to.
Christian
--
You must be
On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 02:38:20PM +, Martin Dickopp wrote:
> The document /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy.txt.gz is entitled in the
> following way:
>
>Debian Policy Manual
>
>
> Section 1.3, `A
On [23/03/03 7:21], Martin Godisch wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 3.5.9.0
> Severity: wishlist
> The noffle package requires inetd or similar, thus the current depends
> line reads
> Depends: [...], netkit-inetd | openbsd-inetd | rlinetd | xinetd | netbase (<<
> 4.0)
> I'd like to
On Mar 23, Martin Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Will inetd-superserver provide both, the super-server and update-inetd?
>Or will inetd-superserver provide the super-server only, and I have to
>check for existence of an update-inetd program? What do I have to depend
>on when my package ju
On Mar 23, Martin Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>One more question, please: What package do you suggest as a non-virtual
>alternative? Thanks!
openbsd-inetd, because it's supposed to take the place of netkit-inetd
(it's basically a traditional BSD-style inetd with a few extra
features).
--
On Mar 23, Martin Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hence, I'm proposing a new virtual package name "internet-server" (or
>something like that).
inetd-superserver, already planned by the *-inetd cospiracy effort.
For the transition, I will make the next netbase package provide
inetd-superserv
On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 09:38:07AM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote:
> > One thing, which I always find hard to find, is the rules about
> > indentation/syntax of extended package descriptions. ...
> Sorry, forget about this. I did not read carefully enough :-(
Yes :) If you search for "description" in
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> ... uses dpkg-source ... Thus all source packages consist of
> three files name.orig.tar.gz, name.diff.gz,
> and name.dsc
What about debian-native packages? I don't think this is true for
them.
--
Blars Blarson
Hello,
another suggestion:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 06:30:08PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Notably, source packages and binary packages now have their own chapters,
> and in these chapters there's stuff from both the old Debian archive chapter
> and from the "packaging considerations" (a.k.a. misc
On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 09:18:58AM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote:
> One thing, which I always find hard to find, is the rules about
> indentation/syntax of extended package descriptions. ...
Sorry, forget about this. I did not read carefully
enough :-(
Jochen
--
Hello,
On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 06:30:08PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> I've shuffled many sections around within the policy manual chapters so that
> there's less cruft and redundancy.
One thing, which I always find hard to find, is the rules about
indentation/syntax of extended package descriptio
22 matches
Mail list logo
