Your message dated Sun, 23 Mar 2003 13:09:31 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#185943: debian-policy: request for virtual package:
internet-server
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Mar 2003 06:21:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 23 00:21:43 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from julius.godisch.de (mx1.godisch.net) [217.69.161.76]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18wyrX-00026k-00; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 00:21:43 -0600
Received: from pd9e84a30.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.232.74.48]
helo=carlos.godisch.de)
by mx1.godisch.net with asmtp (Exim/Debian)
id 18wyrW-0001tf-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 07:21:42 +0100
Received: from godisch by carlos.godisch.de with local (Exim/Debian)
id 18wyrV-0005Zj-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 07:21:41 +0100
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 07:21:41 +0100
From: Martin Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: debian-policy: request for virtual package: internet-server
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50
X-GPG-ID: 0x68DCD606
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 2AB1 9CDD 4BA9 D7FB 6927 5A9E 9A91 821D 68DC D606
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Sender: Martin Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.9 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT,
X_DEBBUGS_CC
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.5.9.0
Severity: wishlist
The noffle package requires inetd or similar, thus the current depends
line reads
Depends: [...], netkit-inetd | openbsd-inetd | rlinetd | xinetd | netbase (<<
4.0)
I'd like to replace this list with a virtual package, e.g.
Depends: [...], netkit-inetd | internet-server
Hence, I'm proposing a new virtual package name "internet-server" (or
something like that).
Please CC me, if you don't reply to debian-devel.
Kind regards,
Martin
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 185943-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Mar 2003 19:11:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 23 13:11:58 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from host-12-107-230-171.dtccom.net (glaurung.green-gryphon.com)
[12.107.230.171]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18xAsv-00087s-00; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 13:11:57 -0600
Received: from glaurung.green-gryphon.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by glaurung.green-gryphon.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Debian-2) with ESMTP id
h2NJ9VfW001759;
Sun, 23 Mar 2003 13:09:32 -0600
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by glaurung.green-gryphon.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Debian-2) id
h2NJ9VmY001755;
Sun, 23 Mar 2003 13:09:31 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: glaurung.green-gryphon.com: srivasta set sender to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50.17 (via feedmail 8 I)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#185943: debian-policy: request for virtual package:
internet-server
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: The Debian Project
X-URL: http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090017 (Oort Gnus v0.17) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux)
(i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Time: Sun Mar 23 13:09:31 2003
X-Face: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/;Y^gTjR\T^"B'fbeuVGiyKrvbfKJl!^e|e:iu(kJ6c|QYB57LP*|t
&YlP~HF/=h:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:6Cj0kd#4]>*D,|0djf'CVlXkI,>aV4\}?d_KEqsN{Nnt7
78"OsbQ["56/!nisvyB/uA5Q.{)gm6?q.j71ww.>b9b]-sG8zNt%KkIa>xWg&1VcjZk[hBQ>]j~`Wq
Xl,y1a!(>6`UM{~'X[Y_,Bv+}=L\SS*mA8=s;!=O`ja|@PEzb&i0}Qp,`Z\:6:OmRi*
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 13:09:31 -0600
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ("Marco d'Itri"'s
message of "Sun, 23 Mar 2003 14:20:50 +0100")
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=4.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,NOSPAM_INC,REFERENCES,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,
SPAM_PHRASE_05_08,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_GNUS_UA,
X_AUTH_WARNING
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
>> On Sun, 23 Mar 2003 14:20:50 +0100,
>> Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Mar 23, Martin Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Will inetd-superserver provide both, the super-server and
>> update-inetd? Or will inetd-superserver provide the super-server
>> only, and I have to check for existence of an update-inetd
>> program? What do I have to depend on when my package just needs
>> an(y) inetd server? Thank you!
> If it will depend on inetd-superserver you will be sure that some
> package will provide /usr/sbin/update-inetd, and that's everything
> your package needs to know.
Given that, I am closing this report. Additionally, you do
not need the virtual package _first_, you can set up a group of
cooperating packages using a virtual package name, and _then_ ask
that to be documented in policy.
manoj
--
byob, v: Believing Your Own Bull
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
