Bug#99933: second attempt at more comprehensive unicode policy

2003-01-03 Thread Colin Walters
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 18:11, Jochen Voss wrote: > Is this meant to apply to programs like "ls", "bash", "touch", and > "emacs"? Yes. > I imagine that the transition period could be a hard time > for users who (like me) use non-ASCII characters in file-names. That is probably true. But we real

Bug#99933: second attempt at more comprehensive unicode policy

2003-01-03 Thread Jochen Voss
Hello, On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 05:25:15PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote: > + Programs should expect filenames in general (whether from > + a Debian package or created by the user) to be encoded > + with UTF-8, although it is recommended for programs to try > + graceful

Bug#99933: Bug#174982: [PROPOSAL]: Debian changelogs should be UTF-8 encoded

2003-01-03 Thread Colin Walters
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 11:45, Radovan Garabik wrote: > > #99933 goes a lot farther than #174982. First of all, we can't even > > suggest that people use UTF-8 in package control fields until all our > > tools support it. Right now it is just plain broken to put anything but > > ASCII in them. >

Bug#175202: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] Clarify Perl package naming convention with more examples

2003-01-03 Thread Kenneth Pronovici
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.5.6.1 Severity: wishlist I guess this bug could be combined into bug #114920, but I decided to file it separately, since I'm not sure exactly where that bug is going. A discussion around bug #175061 (an ITP of mine) highlights some confusion I had about Perl nami

Re: Bug#174982: [PROPOSAL]: Debian changelogs should be UTF-8 encoded

2003-01-03 Thread Radovan Garabik
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 01:57:35PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote: > On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 13:12, Radovan Garabik wrote: > > > see #99933. It has been seconded and generally accepted at the time, > > but policy freeze caused it did not get into policy then. > > Hmm, I searched the policy bug list, I

Bug#174982: [PROPOSAL]: Debian changelogs should be UTF-8 encoded

2003-01-03 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Roland! You wrote: > >> Policy applies to all packages, whether they state that they comply > >> with it yet or not. I'd also go with "should" in the meantime until > >> a survey is done and we know how many changelogs need to be fixed, > >> but I think in the long run it ought to be mandatory

Bug#174982: [PROPOSAL]: Debian changelogs should be UTF-8 encoded

2003-01-03 Thread Roland Mas
Colin Walters (2003-01-02 11:54:08 -0500) : > On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 09:12, Colin Watson wrote: > >> Policy applies to all packages, whether they state that they comply >> with it yet or not. I'd also go with "should" in the meantime until >> a survey is done and we know how many changelogs need to

Bug#174982: [PROPOSAL]: Debian changelogs should be UTF-8 encoded

2003-01-03 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Colin Walters | Any seconds? seconded. | --- policy.sgml~ 2002-11-15 01:49:40.0 -0500 | +++ policy.sgml 2003-01-01 21:59:26.0 -0500 | @@ -2257,6 +2257,13 @@ | separated by exactly two spaces. | | | +

Bug#174982: [PROPOSAL]: Debian changelogs should be UTF-8 encoded

2003-01-03 Thread Sebastian Rittau
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 10:07:08PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote: > --- policy.sgml~ 2002-11-15 01:49:40.0 -0500 > +++ policy.sgml 2003-01-01 21:59:26.0 -0500 > @@ -2257,6 +2257,13 @@ > separated by exactly two spaces. > > > + > + The entire chan