>>"Brendan" == Brendan O'Dea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brendan> See Bug#160054. I forgot to back-whack some hyphens in the debsums
Brendan> manpage and groff helpfully translated them to a unicode glyph.
Yes. But there are other reasons when mails get quoted
printable. Like when the
>>"Adam" == Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Adam> Er, manoj, it'd help if you mailed the bts bug# when you
Adam> responded to bugs. You then don't need to mail -policy at all,
Adam> as the bts will forward all mails sent to a bug to the
Adam> maintainer(which -policy is, in this case).
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 11:58:31AM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> The second
> reason is also about consistency: during the transition, there will be
> some packages using update-rc.d and some using rc.d-update, which may
> confuse people studying our packages. Not strong reasons, but reasons
> none
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 05:08:54PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>>"Robbe" == Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Robbe> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> shite? Fix your own darned MUA.
>
> Robbe> Is Unicode manadatory now? (You somewhat incorrecly used
> Robbe> U+20
>>"Matthew" == Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matthew> On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 05:53:45PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> there are only two lines or original content in the message, one
>> asking which earlier mail (look into -policy archives), and the
Matthew> i have looked at
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> I am not sure. Maybe Joey Hess, or one of the others kept some.
Nope. Does anyone have a debconf transcript? What happened to those
video tapes? I wanted to review some of the discussion during my debconf
talk too.
I dislike the rc.d anywhere in the name on ge
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 05:53:45PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> there are only two lines or original content in the message, one
> asking which earlier mail (look into -policy archives), and the
i have looked at the archive. none of the thread titles seem germane.
could you give a hint whic
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Matthew" == Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Matthew> i don't know what mailing list manoj is so arrogantly
> Matthew> assuming i read, but i'm clearly not subscribed.
>
> You filed a bug against debian policy. Debian policy is
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> ==
> * #114920: [PROPOSAL] remove foolish consistency in perl module names
>Package: debian-policy; Reported by: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 334
>days old.
>
> There was a long
>>"Matthew" == Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matthew> i don't know what mailing list manoj is so arrogantly
Matthew> assuming i read, but i'm clearly not subscribed.
You filed a bug against debian policy. Debian policy issues
are dealy with on the debian-policy mai
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> i don't know what mailing list manoj is so arrogantly assuming i read,
> but i'm clearly not subscribed. did he respond to the other point i made?
-policy.
>>"Adam" == Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Adam> On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> >>"Matthew" == Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Matthew> can you not use unprintably-encoded mime shite? it's hard to read.
>>
>> shite? Fix your own darned MUA. (Actually,
i don't know what mailing list manoj is so arrogantly assuming i read,
but i'm clearly not subscribed. did he respond to the other point i made?
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 05:30:57PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Adam Heath wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> > >>"Matthew" == Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Matthew> can you not use unprintably-encoded mime shite? it's hard to
> > read.
> >
> > shite? Fix your own darned MUA. (Actually, the
>>"Robbe" == Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robbe> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> shite? Fix your own darned MUA.
Robbe> Is Unicode manadatory now? (You somewhat incorrecly used
Robbe> U+2010, hyphen, in that mail.)
Mandatory? mandated by whom? As the
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Matthew" == Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Matthew> can you not use unprintably-encoded mime shite? it's hard to read.
>
> shite? Fix your own darned MUA. (Actually, the breakage maybe
> in debbugs, since I see my original m
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> shite? Fix your own darned MUA.
Is Unicode manadatory now? (You somewhat incorrecly used U+2010, hyphen,
in that mail.)
--
Robbe
signature.ng
Description: PGP signature
First, I'd like to say that I'm fairly neutral in this debate. None
of my packages will be affected either way, and I have no strong
feelings about the namespaces involved. Nevertheless, I think there
is one argument against the proposal which has been completely
overlooked: update-rc.d is consis
Your message dated Sun, 08 Sep 2002 13:05:51 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#159114: acknowledged by developer(Patents can't
cover software in .nl after all)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
>>"Adrian" == Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Adrian> There remains the issue that _many_ Debian mirrors do mirror
Adrian> non-US which means that the same issue might affect one or
Adrian> more of them.
Adrian> Please make a separate "patented" and don't misuse non-US for
Adrian> th
On Sat, 07 Sep 2002, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >As it was talked in Debconf2, we would be better off if we renamed all
> >*-rc.d utilities (invoke-rc.d, policy-rc.d, update-rc.d) to rc.d-*
> >(rc.d-inv
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 159114
Bug#159114: debian-policy: non-us server is located in a country where it's
possible to patent algorithms
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tra
reopen 159114
thanks
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>...
> Hi,
>
> The relevant law, according to:
> http://www.ivir.nl/wetten/nl/row1995.html
> --
> 2. The following are not regarded inventions in
Your message dated Sun, 08 Sep 2002 03:56:51 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Patents can't cover software in .nl after all
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 115438 [PENDING]: addition of new menu tag for kde menu removal
Bug#115438: [PROPOSAL] addition of new menu tag for kde menu removal
Changed Bug title.
> severity 115438 wishlist
Bug#115438: [PENDING]: addition of new menu tag for kde menu remo
>>"Matthew" == Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matthew> can you not use unprintably-encoded mime shite? it's hard to read.
shite? Fix your own darned MUA. (Actually, the breakage maybe
in debbugs, since I see my original message to -policy just fine, but
the message retrans
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 12:48:06AM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Perusuant to my message earlier, there are the first set of
> pending bug reports.
what message earlier?
> * #132767: debsum support should be mandatory
>Package: debian-policy; Reported by: Matth
Your message dated Sun, 08 Sep 2002 00:34:49 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Reviewing policy bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Sun, 08 Sep 2002 00:34:49 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Reviewing policy bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Hi,
Perusuant to my message earlier, there are the first set of
pending bug reports.
==
* #114920: [PROPOSAL] remove foolish consistency in perl module names
Package: debian-policy; Reported by: Joey Hess <[EMA
30 matches
Mail list logo
