Re: priority of x-window-manager

2000-03-15 Thread Atsuhito Kohda
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: priority of x-window-manager Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 11:26:03 -0500 > I'm willing to support such a priority increase now; Great! It is really great. Thanks a lot. > We can't just say "add 10 points if the window manager is > international

Re: priority of x-window-manager

2000-03-15 Thread Atsuhito Kohda
From: Changwoo Ryu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: priority of x-window-manager Date: 15 Mar 2000 21:04:47 +0900 > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > You misunderstood "i18n" as just the translation support (and "l10n" > as the translations). Translation is just a category of i18n

Bug#60461: debian-policy: FHS conformance not explicit

2000-03-15 Thread Steve Robbins
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Steve Robbins wrote: > > The current policy document does not make explicit that packages ought > > to aim to be "compatible" with FHS, rather than "compliant". > > We don't aim to be fully compliant though. I know the *current* aim is "c

Bug#60461: debian-policy: FHS conformance not explicit

2000-03-15 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Steve Robbins wrote: > The current policy document does not make explicit that packages ought > to aim to be "compatible" with FHS, rather than "compliant". We don't aim to be fully compliant though. Wichert. -- / G

Bug#60461: debian-policy: FHS conformance not explicit

2000-03-15 Thread Steve Robbins
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.1.1.1 Severity: normal The current policy document does not make explicit that packages ought to aim to be "compatible" with FHS, rather than "compliant". Furthermore, the policy does not make explicit *which version* of FHS one ought to follow. There is a pass

Re: priority of x-window-manager

2000-03-15 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 09:04:47PM +0900, Changwoo Ryu wrote: > You misunderstood "i18n" as just the translation support (and "l10n" > as the translations). Translation is just a category of i18n. > Atsuhito means i18n for the correct character displaying. > > Korean (and maybe Japanese) X users

Re: priority of x-window-manager

2000-03-15 Thread Tomohiro KUBOTA
Hi, From: Changwoo Ryu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: priority of x-window-manager Date: 15 Mar 2000 21:04:47 +0900 > Korean (and maybe Japanese) X users often see the Netscape titlebar > incorrectly displays Korean web page title. Many of the window > managers still don't care about this and

Re: priority of x-window-manager

2000-03-15 Thread Changwoo Ryu
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [policies snipped] > Also, I don't understand what this will buy us. An app, such as a window > manager, can be internationalized, but it might not be localized for the > user's locale. > > IOW, it doesn't seem to me that a window manager is any more

Re: priority of x-window-manager

2000-03-15 Thread Atsuhito Kohda
> fvwm95 now support multi-byte character. Its changelog said > > fvwm95 (2.0.43ba-10) unstable; urgency=low > > * Merged in I18N patches from fvwm95-ja > > And I checked with Japanese menu and it works fine with it. Because the current fvwm95 can handle multi-byte character, especially, it