On Mon, Aug 30, 1999 at 02:43:32PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> Basically, yes. But, wishes are intangible... That there are something
> like 2000 packages out there which haven't implemented /usr/share/doc/
> should have been sufficient clue.
Joey Hess did chose not to implement this change yet
On Mon, Aug 30, 1999 at 07:26:47PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> I've been gone a week; this mail is a kind of summary reply, where I
> pull together a number of threads.
Often, those are the best kinds of replies.
On Sat, Aug 28, 1999 at 12:50:57PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> > > That wo
I've been gone a week; this mail is a kind of summary reply, where I
pull together a number of threads.
Raul Miller wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 28, 1999 at 12:50:57PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> > That would be awful. Having to wait while something is rubberstamped,
> > just to get around an issue
Package: debian-policy, emacs19, glibc-doc
Version: not known, 19.34-21, 2.1.1-12
I have:
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 43629 spam
Bug#43629: Cuando este conforme con nuestro trabajo nos paga.
Bug assigned to package `spam'.
> reassign 43669 perl-tk
Bug#43669: Problems with BrowseEntry
Bug assigned to package `perl-tk'.
> reassign 43724 debian-policy
Bug#43724
Hi,
>>"Raul" == Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raul> Technical policy is supposed to be ratified by the technical committee.
Raul> [The committee hadn't been doing its job, but that doesn't free any of
Raul> us from the responsibility for failures in technical policy.]
If that
Hi,
>>"Raul" == Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raul> Yes. What you're thinking is pretty close to what I'm thinking.
Hmm. In that case, I'd prefer a paraphrase of your one
sentence description -- "policy should not make changes that
contradict currrent policy withiout allowin
On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 12:00:08PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> 3) Once a reasonable number (to be decided, reasonable could also
> be nearly all) have moved away from the legal but deprecated
> old AA method to the new BB method, policy can be changed to
> say BB i
8 matches
Mail list logo
