Hi,
>>"Raul" == Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raul> Yes. What you're thinking is pretty close to what I'm thinking.
Hmm. In that case, I'd prefer a paraphrase of your one
sentence description -- "policy should not make changes that
contradict currrent policy withiout allowing for a transition period,
during which both the old and the new policy should be legal."
This is longer, but possibly easier to understand (at least,
it was easier for me)
Raul> [Most of the text of your letter is the sort of stuff that I
Raul> think of as policy -- and that's non-technical policy, and is
Raul> exactly the sort of thing that the policy group should be
Raul> formulating. ... In my personal opinion this sort of policy is
Raul> needed.]
I agree that we do need some policy regarding major changes to
policy (one that affect large numbers of packages).
manoj
--
What is now proved was once only imagin'd. William Blake
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
