> "ju" == Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ju> Hmm... I haven't noticed since I usually have /tmp as tmpfs...
ju> It's usually not a good idea to have a scratch area on the
ju> root filesystem, so it's probably better for people make a
ju> different partition anyway.
> Also notice that we are working on the following ToDo wrt to jack:
>
> http://devel.agnula.org/tracker/?func=detail&aid=37&group_id=8&atid=141
>
> which is basically an advice from Fernando Lopez-Lezcano about
> mounting a tempfs filesystem on /tmp/jack (or something like that) and
>
That's what I use on my setup. It would be a nice adition if we
could have that optionally configured by the installation scripts
using debconf.
On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 08:07, Andrea Glorioso wrote:
> which is basically an advice from Fernando Lopez-Lezcano about
> mounting a tempfs filesyst
> "ju" == Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > ju> I've got an impression that by the time we actually get
>> this > ju> release in, we are probably going to be looking at
>> 0.90, which > ju> should be more stable, and then we'll
>> probably be looking at > ju> 1.0,
> > ju> I've got an impression that by the time we actually get this
> > ju> release in, we are probably going to be looking at 0.90, which
> > ju> should be more stable, and then we'll probably be looking at
> > ju> 1.0, which should be two more ABI changes; which isn't too
> >
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Andrea Glorioso wrote:
> [Keeping only debian-multimedia and [EMAIL PROTECTED] on the
> recipients' list, as I suspect it's not that interesting for the other
> original recipients]
>
> > "ju" == Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Do we have a plan how
6 matches
Mail list logo
