>>>>> "ju" == Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > ju> I've got an impression that by the time we actually get
>> this > ju> release in, we are probably going to be looking at
>> 0.90, which > ju> should be more stable, and then we'll
>> probably be looking at > ju> 1.0, which should be two more ABI
>> changes; which isn't too > ju> bad.
>> >
>> > For the record, at:
>> >
>> > http://apt.agnula.org/pool/main/j/jack-audio-connection-kit/
>> >
>> > you can find an unofficial package of Jack 0.90.1. The
>> sources.list > lines are:
>> >
>> Most probably we'll stick to Jack 0.90.1 for the DeMuDi 1.1
>> forthcoming release. All packages that depend on jack will be
>> rebuilt against the 0.90.1 library.
ju> It would be nice to know whether packages actually build
ju> against jack 0.90.1.
We are going to do it in the forthcoming days.
ju> Currently I seem to have problems connecting to the cited URL,
ju> but I'll check your packaging when I can reach the site.
You should now be able to do it - we had to shut down the server for
some technical problems at KTH.
Please notice that our .deb packages are built against a 20031115
sid-frozen snapshot.
Also notice that we are working on the following ToDo wrt to jack:
http://devel.agnula.org/tracker/?func=detail&aid=37&group_id=8&atid=141
which is basically an advice from Fernando Lopez-Lezcano about
mounting a tempfs filesystem on /tmp/jack (or something like that) and
use that as the TEMPDIR for jackd. Especially on ext3 and reiserfs,
that seems to cut down a lot of xruns.
bye,
andrea
--
Andrea Glorioso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AGNULA/DeMuDi Techie http://www.agnula.org/
"There's no free expression without control on the tools you use"
