Hello,
I have already built limewire 4.0.6 from the previous verision's
makefile and would like to maintain. I am looking for a sponsor as I am
new to development.
Thanks,
James
Hello,
I have already built limewire 4.0.6 from the previous verision's
makefile and would like to maintain. I am looking for a sponsor as I am
new to development.
Thanks,
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
datory to
use the standard format, and at the same time retire any pre-standard
entries to debian/changelog.old or similar?
Thanks,
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
such an old version? I put out a
0.2.0 tarball back in February, and never put out a 0.1 release.
James.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> in the other *-buildpackage programs.
This was actually cribbed from "svn-do" provided by "svn-buildpackage",
which I believe is in $PATH now.
Thanks,
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
age but it didn't work.
- Is the separate -dev package worthwhile? It contains only 3 source files.
Kind regards
--
James Chapman
Katalix Systems Ltd
http://www.katalix.com
Catalysts for your Embedded Linux software development
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
ove should be "LP: #301041".
Thanks for your help,
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 19 May 2006 13:47:17 +0200
Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Thijs,
> On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 23:29 +0200, Piotr Ozarowski wrote:
> > I'm looking for a sponsor for advancecomp (ITP #367112).
> > Package is lintian/linda clean and builds in pbuilder.
>
> > dget http://debian.pox
retrieve the packages once the following lines are added to your
sources.list:
deb http://hebb.cis.uoguelph.ca/~jstark/debian ./
deb-src http://hebb.cis.uoguelph.ca/~jstark/debian ./
Thanks,
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
HI my name is james pringle i will be coming to ft lewis on june 15 i will be at the seattleaiport at 1415on the 15th and am in need of sponor if u would have time for me that would be great thank u for ur time __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam
ebian/copyright.
[To the rest of the list, I was one of the people that built the package
in pbuilder and it worked fine]
James
--
James Westby
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jameswestby.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I do code, but work within sales and marketing for my day job. As I'm
a big fan of Debian, I want to help out. Is there a central
non-technical mentors list also?
--
James Duncan
"To any truly impartial person, it would be obvious that I am right."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Just to clarify, I intend to help out on the marketing side.
On 13/06/06, James Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I do code, but work within sales and marketing for my day job. As I'm
a big fan of Debian, I want to help out. Is there a central
non-technical mentors list also?
--
J
ns? I'd really welcome some feedback on this.
--
James Duncan
"To any truly impartial person, it would be obvious that I am right."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ns? I'd really welcome some feedback on this.
--
James Duncan
"To any truly impartial person, it would be obvious that I am right."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ntains:
deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Thanks,
James
--
James E. Stark B.Sc. (Eng.)
M.Sc. Candidate
Department of Computing and Information Science
University of Guelph
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
ckaging is released under.
I hope you can get this package in to Debian,
James
--
James Westby
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jameswestby.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On (26/07/06 11:15), Kenny Duffus wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 July 2006 10:55, James Westby wrote:
> > * debian/rules clean should call make distclean not make clean.
>
> this was changed as distclean is not used in the Makefile but clean appears to
> do the same thing
I did a
ebian/pool/main/s/seccure/seccure_0.1-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
James Westby
--
James Westby
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jameswestby.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
h lintian to catch this situation and ignore it.
If someone will confirm that I am correct I will file a bug against
lintian to do this.
James
--
James Westby
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jameswestby.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On (29/07/06 21:55), George Danchev wrote:
> On Saturday 29 July 2006 21:41, James Westby wrote:
> > On (29/07/06 14:14), Kevin Coyner wrote:
> > > Please note that at mentors.debian.net it does throw off a lintian
> > > warning:
> > >
> > > W: s
On (30/07/06 12:17), Ricardo Mones wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 13:00:28 +0100
> James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "seccure".
> Would be interesting to point some dif
long should I wait before doing so?
Thanks,
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
see nothing wrong with your English. Thanks for packaging this, I will
certainly be using it. Unfortunately I can't upload it myself.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM -
is is an upstream bug ?
> debian/furl.1 is generated by help2man (that's read the output of --help
> switch).
> If it's, I'll notice the upstream about this (and fix the manpage).
Ok, it looks like a bug, or certainly lack of documentation if you are
able to specify a file for
et:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/seccure
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
contrib non-free
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/seccure/seccure_0.2-1.dsc
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577F
> > * Package name: seccure
Max Vozeler kindly sposored this package.
Thanks Max.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On (16/08/06 14:36), Marco Bertorello wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:15:59 +0100
> James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On (11/08/06 12:26), Marco Bertorello wrote:
> I've corrected all things:
I haven't looked at the packaging again, sorry.
>
&
ged:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tunapie/
I am also not completely sure what the correct way to package python apps
under Debian is, and I would appreciate some feedback about this.
Best wishes,
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe&quo
On (01/09/06 15:38), George Danchev wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.10.2-1
> of my package "bobcat".
>
> The upload would fix these bugs: 385312
>
It's probably a good idea to mention that 385312 is an RC bug.
J
uses scons, and so it is hard
to follow the instructions there.
There is one package in Debian that uses both scons and python-support,
xmms2. Perhaps you can work out how it does it. I am having trouble.
James
--
James Westby
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On (03/09/06 12:13), James Westby wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 05:16:13 +0200
> "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm working on Museek+ packaging and I have a problem.
> > There is an arch dependent fil
o they should be able to tell you whether the code is
distributable.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On (09/09/06 05:44), Adam Cecile wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Sep 2006 01:26:18 +0100, James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok, so the trick is to modify the SConscripts of the relevant packages
> > to build for more than just the default python version.
> >
> >
On (09/09/06 13:19), James Westby wrote:
> On (09/09/06 05:44), Adam Cecile wrote:
> > A friend told me the file must be python's version independent, what do you
> > think about it ?
> >
>
> I'm sorry, I don't understand what you mean.
>
After d
libgcrypt,
which is under a DFSG free license, though you may wish to look at
using a library more thoroughly that just copying the code.
I think that should be enough to keep you going.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure ke
basound-dev (>= 1.0),
libsidplay2-dev | libsidplay1-dev
Perhaps someone on this list can tell me whether it is more sensible to
have them this way or not.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)
but I would like to know that you have chosen this route for the
right reasons.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
[Moving back on list as more people will be able to help]
On (10/09/06 10:57), Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote:
> James Westby wrote:
> > * Please add a full stop to the Initial release line of you
> > debian/changelog.
>
> Sorry, what is a full stop?
This one doe
aries, yet they seem to untar with executable
permissions.
What is the best way to modify the permissions when I copy them over?
regards
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It builds these binary packages:
chuck - a strongly-timed and on-the-fly audio programming language
The package is lintian clean.
The upload would fix the following ITP bug: 267626
Link: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/chuck/chuck_1.2.0.6-1.dsc
regards
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
[Apologies for replying to my own message again, but Adam keeps
mentioning things in other channels to which I cannot respond]
On (09/09/06 19:57), James Westby wrote:
> After discussion on IRC it seems that a compile flag is wanted to do
> this.
>
Ok, in #361400 you say you are not h
support all printers?
The README.Debian includes a list, but it would be good to have a
short list in the desciption, (e.g. "many printers from Epson and HP
are supported")
* Your debian/copyright disagrees with the AUTHORS file about the
upstream authors, also yo
* There's a linda warning saying the the long description contains the
short description, consider fixing this.
I don't have a printer so I can't test the package.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edC
On (11/09/06 16:47), Nico Golde wrote:
> * James Healy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-11 16:23]:
> > I am looking for feedback and/or a sponsor for my package
> > "chuck".
This looks interesting, thanks for your work.
>
> I did a quick look at it the followi
On (12/09/06 00:37), "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" wrote:
> James Westby wrote:
> > On (11/09/06 09:40), Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
> >
> >> Dear mentors,
> >>
> >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libinklevel".
> >
not
sure whether another DD would do it if you haven't talked to the other
interested people. I think your best bet would be one of the two DDs
that have already expressed an interest in the package.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
se
7;t I'm afraid, but maybe someone else would like to.
[P.S. Adam has asked before on this list, but failed to find a sponsor
for this package]
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0&
Your changelog mentions that you added a debian/watch file but there
isn't one.
* There are a few lintian messages about hyphens in manpages (you need
to turn on all output of lintian to see them). You could fix these,
but it's not a showstopper.
James
--
James
ork for managing the byte compilation,
either python-support or python-central.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
d all copyright statements in your
debian/copyright. If there are none you should contact upstream to
add them.
* You need to Build-Depends on dpatch. Do you know about pbuilder to
try and help you catch things like that?
* Linda tells us that lissac-doc should be in Section: doc.
e updated. In the middle
is a clarification from upstream, and the addition of the usual
Copyright statements and license headers.
* Does the Debian games team that you say you are adopting the package
for not contain some DDs who will sponsor the packages of the group?
James
--
James We
On (13/09/06 21:05), Adam Cecile wrote:
> Hi again James^^
>
Hi Adam,
No need to email me and Cc: the list, just send direct to the list. I
think it should be pretty clear to you that I read the list :)
> > * Why does the md5sum of the .orig.tar.gz differ from th
that, however I am not talking about the license, I am
referring to Copyright statements, e.g.
Copyright 2006 James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
They are a separate issue from licenses, as they state who has the
Copyright for the work. Licenses deal with what you as a
user/redistributer/whate
On (13/09/06 22:14), Nacho Barrientos Arias wrote:
> Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 20:59:14 +0100
> James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > *
> > http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html*/-bpp-upstream-info
> > sugges
On (14/09/06 11:51), Philipp Benner wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:45:59 +0100
> James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I wouldn't say that noone is responding. It is a little slow, but it
> > seems like there is work being done.
> >
> > Have you c
On (14/09/06 00:08), Nacho Barrientos Arias wrote:
> Firstly, i apologize for this massive email sending to the mail list.
No problem.
>
> I uploaded to mentors a new package [1] which fix all this issues (and
> the suggested by James). I'm pending upstream's confirmation
On (13/09/06 21:20), Ryan Finnie wrote:
> Greetings James,
>
> Thank you for the recommendations.
>
> On 9/13/06, James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > * Your debian/copyright needs more work, see
> >http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announ
On (14/09/06 13:44), Ryan Finnie wrote:
> On 9/14/06, James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Not quite, you missed md5.c. This file is not under the same license as
> >the rest of the package, and must be documented in debian/rules.
>
> (I'm assuming you m
t;
> Aha, xmms-skin-debian-4.0-etch_0.1.0-1_all.deb is there but
> WHY does dpkg-buildpackage create a *_i386.changes ?
>
That is normal. The changes contains the arch string even for arch: all
builds. There is no problem in this.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13
On (14/09/06 15:15), Ryan Finnie wrote:
> isomd5sum_11.1.0.95-1 has been updated in-place. Removed .cvsignore,
> added md5.c information to debian/copyright, removed unnecessary
> current maintainer line from debian/copyright. James, thanks a lot
> for your help.
Looks good to me
On (13/09/06 21:01), James Westby wrote:
> On (13/09/06 21:05), Adam Cecile wrote:
> >
> > Because I repacked the source tarball to change version (use of "~").
> >
>
> I don't think there's a need to repack, just rename I think should work.
another question about usage relatively quickly.
>
As Steve suggests we can try and work around the problem, and substitute
another library. It would be good if we could get the libraries
relicensed though so we don't have to distribute a lesser package.
If you have anything resembling a p
t is
not your choice.) Can you tell me why it is done like this?
I hope you find a sponsor. I certainly think the package is ready for an
upload.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)T
y
thing that shows that they meant the BSD license, and indeed the 3
clause BSD?
* Also there is some boilerplate in files under debian/ that could be
removed (debian/rules and debian/watch specifically).
Now, if only I could remember how to use Haskell so that I could check
all
On (16/09/06 02:09), "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" wrote:
> James Westby wrote:
> > On (13/09/06 21:01), James Westby wrote:
> >> On (13/09/06 21:05), Adam Cecile wrote:
> >>> Because I repacked the source tarball to change version (use of "~").
> >
header from the package.
* debian/dirs is redundant here.
I cannot sponsor the package for you though.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On (16/09/06 21:34), Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, James Westby wrote:
> > * The debian/copyright file is lacking. There is no copyright
> > information, what is referred to as Copyright is in fact a License,
> > and not a copy of a license he
On (16/09/06 09:12), Arjan Oosting wrote:
> Op za, 16-09-2006 te 00:13 +0100, schreef James Westby:
> > * debian/dirs is redundant here.
> Huh? Why is it redundant? The upstream Makefile does not create
> $(bindir) so I debian/dirs to make sure usr/bin exists.
>
Sorry.
ers to his files?
* There is also an aspell in the package, is it capable of creating an
dictionary for aspell. If so do you not want to package that as
well?
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!&g
copyright/license statement about your packaging. See
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/03/msg00023.html
Again, I cannot sponsor the package for you, sorry.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edC
On (19/09/06 12:27), Neil Williams wrote:
> Mashrab Kuvatov wrote:
> > On Tuesday 19 September 2006 03:44, James Westby wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, I can't sponsor as I am not a DD, but I have some comments,
> >>
> >> * I don't think the pack
On (19/09/06 22:56), Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 01:01:15PM +0100, James Westby a écrit :
> >
> > See http://jameswestby.net/mentors/glossary/native.html
>
> Hi James,
>
> Quoting your site:
>
> "A Debian native package is a package t
to avoid certain headaches. Obviously if
packages/programs want to link statically to the libs then ship it.
The packaging looks ok otherwise. I haven't installed the packages and
tested them though.
Does anybody else have an opinion on .a and .la files in packages?
James
--
On (19/09/06 19:30), Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> On 19/09/06, James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A Debian native package is a program written specifically to Debian,
>
> A package is not a program. s/to/for/ =>
>
> "A Debian native package is a package
oesn't work. You
should just rm them instead.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
package for you.
However the package in question has already been claimed by someone
else. You could email the bug report and them and ask if they would be
interested in co-maintainence, but if they are not then you are stuck
I'm afraid.
See
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg
all the files is in order.
* You also have a long line in debian/copyright.
* Should dh_installmenu be commented out?
The binary packages look ok though. I haven't tested them at all though.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccur
On (20/09/06 15:00), Frank S. Thomas wrote:
> Hi James and thanks for reviewing!
>
No problem.
> On Tuesday 19 September 2006 22:07, James Westby wrote:
> > * These lines from your install file are odd
> > debian/tmp/usr/bin usr
> > debian/tmp
hink nostrip
would work for your package like this. Please add them, and if the
package doesn't build with them try and fix it.
The binary package looks OK, but I haven't tested it.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure ke
m has already pointed out to you this software is being packaged
by someone else. Do you know about wnpp?
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0&
license notices in some of the files indicate that the license
> is LGPL, which certainly is not the case. I suspect a copy/paste
> error and asked upstream to correct this.
>
> * Oddly, the file RSSKit/GNUmakefile seems to be under LGPL. I have
> indicated that i
On (21/09/06 12:00), Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, James Westby wrote:
> > On (20/09/06 15:00), Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Could someone please sponsor a New Maintainer upload of swish++?
>
think that will cut it. I think you need to fake a new upstream
version greater than that which is currently there.
mentors.d.n allows you to overwrite files in the archive, while the
official archive does not.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
On (21/09/06 10:41), George Danchev wrote:
> On Thursday 21 September 2006 10:27, James Westby wrote:
> > > So that I can keep the ordering before the final upload.
> > > For example the version after I incorporate the changes you suggest
> > > will be 6.1.4-0pre4
On (21/09/06 14:29), martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.09.21.1419 +0200]:
> > The convention is, I believe, that an upload to mentors.debian.net
> > does not count as a release, as anyone who downloads a package
> > from there
On (21/09/06 12:47), Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, James Westby wrote detailed comments
> on my packaging of swish++.
>
> Consequently, I have newer versions at:
>
> http://www.imsc.res.in/~kapil/debian/swish++/swish++_6.1.4-0pre4.
D3; see COPYRIGHT file for terms and conditions"
but the COPYRIGHT file doesn't contain BSD3. Is it worth seeking
clarification?
The packages look good overall. I hope you find a sponsor.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
se
On (20/09/06 14:08), James Westby wrote:
> I'll have another look on my next checking run, if they haven't been
> sponsored by then.
They look good to me, though upstream could do with sorting out the
copyright and licenses.
I have tested the package and a short example seems to
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/03/msg00023.html
for the current preferred form.
* Have you considered moving to a debhelper debian/rules?
* Does the package really need to doo auto* in the debian/rules?
* Consider adding a debian/watch file.
James
--
James West
On (21/09/06 18:57), James Westby wrote:
> [I'm splitting this up to make it clearer what is going on]
>
> On (21/09/06 18:12), Timo Jyrinki wrote:
> > Lovely mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my packages "suomi-malaga", "libvoikko
an/watch file doesn't work. It is pretty clear why, please
fix it or remove it (preferably the former).
The binary packages look ok, but I haven't tested them, I wouldn't know
where to start.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.
symbolic link where?
Anyway I tried to document this here
http://jameswestby.net/mentors/commonpackingmistakes/nativepackage.html
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM
On (21/09/06 20:26), James Westby wrote:
> On (21/09/06 18:12), Timo Jyrinki wrote:
> > * Package name: suomi-malaga
>
> Hi,
>
> * Have you filed an ITP? If so you should close it in the changelog.
> * Why does the source package go in section misc if it's o
I: libvoikko-dev: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign
usr/share/man/man1/voikkospell.1.gz:43
James
[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2006/09/msg00228.html
[1]
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html#s-bpp-upstream-info
[2] http://lists.debi
ecause linking
not done
i486-linux-gnu-g++: defs: linker input file unused because linking
not done
here, maybe you want to fix that.
* There is a lintian warning
W: tmispell-voikko: binary-without-manpage ispell
but I'm not sure how this should be handled.
James
er that CFLAGS, the consequence
of which is that the package is built without -g.
* The binary package name differs from the source package name again.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E
pends lines to
remove some spurious lintian warnings. There should be spaces after
commas, and around pipes (|).
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp2
ight at 80 chars.
* You can delete unused dh_* calls from debian/rules.
* You should move tetex-extra and debiandoc-sgml to
Build-Depends-Indep as you are building arch: all and are not using
them in the clean target. (Thanks to lintian).
Unfortunately I cannot sponsor the package for y
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tunapie".
* Package name: tunapie
Version : 1.0-2
Upstream Author : James Stone
* URL : tunapie.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Section : sound
It builds these binary package
1 - 100 of 811 matches
Mail list logo
