[Moving back on list as more people will be able to help] On (10/09/06 10:57), Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote: > James Westby wrote: > > * Please add a full stop to the Initial release line of you > > debian/changelog. > > Sorry, what is a full stop?
This one doesn't matter. The next package I reviewed, also has this, and it turns out it is part of the dh_make templates. Sorry for the noise. [A full stop is a period, ".".] > > * You Conflict with lha, and then try and set up an alternative for > > lha. Is this really what you intend? I can see why it might be done, > > but I would like to know that you have chosen this route for the > > right reasons. > > No, I don't really want to conflict to lha. Actually, I want a virtual > package named 'lha' (provides lha). And the non-free lha should also use > update-alternatives and provides lha. However, I still have to conflict > to the old version of lha because it really conflicts. Maybe I should > discuss it in the debian-devel and file bugs to debian-policy for the > virtual package. I'm still thinking what is the first thing I should do. > This is reasonable. You can file a wishlist bug against the lha package asking them to use alternatives. You can discuss with them about priorities. I'm not sure that you need a bug against policy. James -- James Westby -- GPG Key ID: B577FE13 -- http://jameswestby.net/ seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
