RFS: sshproxy

age for me. Kind regards Vincent Bernat -- DODGEBALL STOPS AT THE GYM DOOR DODGEBALL STOPS AT THE GYM DOOR DODGEBALL STOPS AT THE GYM DOOR -+- Bart Simpson on chalkboard in episode BABF12 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RFS: sshproxy

debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sshproxy - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sshproxy/sshproxy_0.5.99~0.6.0.beta2-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regard

Re: RFS: evilvte - lightweight terminal emulator

OoO En cette matinée pluvieuse du samedi 08 mars 2008, vers 10:58, Wen-Yen Chuang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > evilvte is a terminal emulator. It supports almost everything VTE provides. > It also supports tabs, tabbar autohide, and switch encoding at runtime. > Configuration is via edit

Re: cowbuilder and --distribution experimental

On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 13:04:24 +0200, "Salvatore Ansani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi again mentors !!! > I've now a strange problem creating an experimental COW image. > > I use "cowbuilder --create --distribution experimental" but I obtain an > unmet error with e2fsprogs (PreDepends: libuuid1 (

RFS: nikto

ontrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/n/nikto/nikto_2.02-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Vincent Bernat -- panic("Tell me what a watchpoint trap is, and I'll then deal with such a beast..."); 2.2.16

Re: buildd is not building my package.

OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du samedi 19 avril 2008, vers 18:02, Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > PS It might be that I'm "impatient", I only mailed them recently. >Then that is my fault (probably because I'm myself a very >fast response time guy; I read and answer mails ma

Re: tcltls & possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl

OoO Pendant le journal télévisé du samedi 19 avril 2008, vers 20:35, Muammar El Khatib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > I am maintaining tcltls, and now I have to upload a new version. When I ran > lintian -iI I got this: > W: tcltls: possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl > N: > N: This packag

Re: Test suites

OoO En ce début d'après-midi nuageux du dimanche 20 avril 2008, vers 14:58, "Martin Fuzzey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > A little question regarding automatic test suites : > When a package provides such a suite should the normal package build process : > 1) Always run the test suite (for e

Re: RFS: evilvte - lightweight terminal emulator

On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 10:05:34 +0800, Wen-Yen Chuang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Package name: evilvte > Version : 0.4.1-1 > Upstream Author : Wen-Yen Chuang > * URL : http://www.calno.com/evilvte/ > * License : GPL-2 > Programing Langua

Re: RFS: evilvte - lightweight terminal emulator

OoO En cette fin de matinée radieuse du lundi 21 avril 2008, vers 11:17, je disais: > Here are some remarks: > - debian/copyright states GPLv2 or later while source code says GPLv2 > only. > - cleanup debian/watch with the only revelant entry > - since you are distributing a binary distribution

Re: RFS: evilvte - lightweight terminal emulator

OoO En ce milieu de nuit étoilée du mardi 22 avril 2008, vers 04:20, Wen-Yen Chuang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > Vincent Bernat wrote: >> - debian/copyright states GPLv2 or later while source code says >> GPLv2 only. > Fixed. There is a mix of incompatible licens

Re: RFS: evilvte - lightweight terminal emulator

OoO En ce doux début de matinée du mardi 22 avril 2008, vers 08:06, je disais: >> Vincent Bernat wrote: >>> - debian/copyright states GPLv2 or later while source code says >>> GPLv2 only. >> Fixed. > There is a mix of incompatible licenses. You cannot mix

Re: RFS: evilvte - lightweight terminal emulator

On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 23:40:18 -0700, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is incorrect. There is no problem whatsoever with mixing GPLv2 or > later with GPLv2 only. However, you should not misconstrue the > situtation in the copyright file by indicating which parts are GPLv2 > only and

Re: RFS: evilvte - lightweight terminal emulator

OoO En ce début d'après-midi ensoleillé du mardi 22 avril 2008, vers 15:17, Wen-Yen Chuang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/evilvte/evilvte_0.4.2-1.dsc Uploaded. -- BOFH excuse #132: SCSI Cha

Re: RFS: vttest - tests VT100 compatibility of terminals

OoO En cette fin de nuit blanche du mercredi 23 avril 2008, vers 05:15, Wen-Yen Chuang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vttest/vttest_2.7+20071216-1.dsc I am not sure, but I think that the desc

Re: RFS: vttest - tests VT100 compatibility of terminals

On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:36:42 +0800, Wen-Yen Chuang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> You should also correct debian/watch with some mangling. > > I have read /usr/bin/uscan but have no idea how to fix it. > The only way I know is to keep the upstream versioning "vttest 20071216". > But I think "vtte

Re: RFS: vttest - tests VT100 compatibility of terminals

OoO En cette matinée pluvieuse du mercredi 23 avril 2008, vers 10:12, Wen-Yen Chuang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vttest/vttest_2.7+20071216-1.dsc OK, we can wait a few days to get some

Re: RFS: bugs-everywhere

On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:41:30 +1000, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Howdy mentors, > > I have a package that is seeking a sponsor. > > Package name: bugs-everywhere > Version:0.0.193-2~rc1 > Upstream Author:Aaron Bentley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: RFS: meshlab

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:43:03 +0200, "Teemu Ikonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "meshlab". > > * Package name: meshlab > Version : 1.1.1-1 > Upstream Author : Paolo Cignoni and others > * URL : http://meshlab

Re: RFS: bugs-everywhere

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 23:38:17 +1000, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Did you get the mail from Alexander? > > Alexander who? When was it sent? This message : -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Re: foo.diff.gz "difficult to read"

OoO En ce milieu de nuit étoilée du vendredi 25 avril 2008, vers 03:58, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Did you get the mail from Alexander? [from Alexander Schmehl, on a >> different thread. >> http://lists.

Re: A question about adopting a package

On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:05:26 +0400, Stanislav Maslovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > === 8< >> > package wnpp >> > retitle 465910 ITA: nec -- NEC2 Antenna Modelling System >> > owner 465910 ! >> > quit >> > === >8 ===

Re: RFS: vttest - tests VT100 compatibility of terminals

OoO En cette fin de nuit blanche du samedi 26 avril 2008, vers 06:51, Wen-Yen Chuang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> OK, we can wait a few days to get some feedback to your request >> in [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Discussion result for vttest's description: >

Re: RFS: wget-el (updated package)

OoO En cette matinée pluvieuse du samedi 26 avril 2008, vers 10:56, Josue Abarca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > Dear mentors, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.0-5 > of my package "wget-el". > It builds these binary packages: > wget-el- an interface for wget on Emacsen

Re: RFS: magic

OoO En ce début d'après-midi ensoleillé du samedi 26 avril 2008, vers 15:22, Aanjhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/magic > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable

Re: RFS: magic

OoO Pendant le repas du samedi 26 avril 2008, vers 19:59, "Aanjhan R" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > Thanks for the quick look and your valuable remarks. I am not sure of > what exactly I should be asking upstream. Is there a problem with GPL > + BSD mix license? Sorry. I am not getting the prob

Re: RFS: wget-el (updated package)

OoO En ce début d'après-midi ensoleillé du lundi 28 avril 2008, vers 15:06, Josue Abarca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > Vincent, thank you for the remarks. > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wget-el > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable mai

Re: RFS: gnurobbo

OoO En cette nuit striée d'éclairs du dimanche 27 avril 2008, vers 02:06, Ansgar Burchardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > Lintian v1.23.46 complains about files generated by configure in the > upstream tarball (config.log, config.status). I added an override, because > they will be regenerat

Re: Files outside debian directory in diff

OoO En ce début de soirée du mardi 29 avril 2008, vers 21:21, Andres Mejia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > As you all might know, rerunning autotools during a build of a package will > leave a substantial amount of files modified outside of the debian directory, > and thus will increase the si

Re: Files outside debian directory in diff

OoO En ce début de soirée du mardi 29 avril 2008, vers 21:30, Andres Mejia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> You can just remove the generated files in the clean target. It will not >> appear in the diff. You will get some warnings telling you that >> suppressed files are ignored. > I t

Re: RFS: gnurobbo

OoO En cette fin de matinée radieuse du jeudi 01 mai 2008, vers 11:46, Ansgar Burchardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > Done, and uploaded the new version to mentors. It's still available with > dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnurobbo/gnurobbo_0.57.1-2.dsc I should have spot

Re: RFS: turbotinymce

OoO En cette nuit striée d'éclairs du dimanche 04 mai 2008, vers 02:19, Monty Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > Dear mentors, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "turbotinymce". Hi Monty! I have not looked at your package yet, but did you consider joining DPMT to maintain this pac

Re: RFS: icecream (updated and adopted package)

OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du vendredi 02 mai 2008, vers 18:54, Cristian Greco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > Dear mentors, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "icecream". [...] Uploaded. Thanks! -- I WILL NOT USE ABBREV. I WILL NOT USE ABBREV. I WILL NOT USE ABBREV. -+- Bart Si

Re: RFS: gnurobbo

OoO En ce début de soirée du dimanche 04 mai 2008, vers 21:53, Ansgar Burchardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> > Done, and uploaded the new version to mentors. It's still available with >> > dget >> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnurobbo/gnurobbo_0.57.1-2.dsc >> >> I should h

Re: RFS: turbotinymce

OoO La nuit ayant déjà recouvert d'encre ce jour du dimanche 04 mai 2008, vers 23:38, Monty Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > Hi Vincent, > Vincent Bernat wrote: >> I have not looked at your package yet, but did you consider joining DPMT >> to maintain

Re: RFS: parcellite

OoO Pendant le journal télévisé du lundi 05 mai 2008, vers 20:13, Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "parcellite". It's a light > weight gtk+ clipboard manager not yet in Debian. It would also be my > first package in Debian, so I would appreciate a revi

Re: RFS: turbotinymce

OoO En cette soirée bien amorcée du lundi 05 mai 2008, vers 22:44, Monty Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> You may want to add Homepage field to source stanza of debian/control >> and a debian/watch file (this will help the use of svn-buildpackage >> too). >> >> Moreover, there should

Re: RFS: gnurobbo

OoO En ce début de soirée du dimanche 04 mai 2008, vers 21:53, Ansgar Burchardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > Thanks for pointing this out. I uploaded a new version to mentors. You may want to try to close the last remaining bug by asking the original submitter if he is able to reprod

Re: RFS: obm

OoO En cette fin de matinée radieuse du mardi 06 mai 2008, vers 11:56, Sylvain Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > It builds these binary packages: > obm- Open Business Management > obm-conf - Open Business Management > obm-core - Open Business Management > obm-storage - Open Busine

Re: RFS: obm

OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du jeudi 08 mai 2008, vers 00:40, je disais: >> It builds these binary packages: >> obm- Open Business Management >> obm-conf - Open Business Management >> obm-core - Open Business Management >> obm-storage - Open Business Management >> obm-ui - Open Business

Re: RFS: fpm2 - a password manager

OoO En cette fin de nuit blanche du jeudi 08 mai 2008, vers 05:54, Wen-Yen Chuang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > Long description: > Figaro's Password Manager 2 is a program that allows you to securely > store the passwords. Passwords are encrypted with the blowfish > algorithm. Hi! You

Re: RFS: fpm2 - a password manager

OoO En ce doux début de matinée du jeudi 08 mai 2008, vers 08:38, Olivier Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > It seems that fpm2 would replace fpm, so, you may wish to address the > RFP for fpm in #457155 maybe. > Also, maybe your package (which I didn't have a look at) should replace > f

Re: RFS: fpm2 - a password manager

OoO En cette matinée pluvieuse du jeudi 08 mai 2008, vers 10:45, Wen-Yen Chuang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> caleb, does fpm2 can be a drop-in replacement for fpm? In this case, you >> could provide fpm metapackage as an upgrade path to fpm2. > FPM2 basically share the same code base of fpm.

Re: RFS: fpm2 - a password manager

OoO En ce début d'après-midi ensoleillé du jeudi 08 mai 2008, vers 15:35, Wen-Yen Chuang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > fpm2 now Conflicts: fpm (<< 0.61) > Replaces: fpm (<< 0.61) > Provides: fpm Why not << 0.71 ? -- I WILL NOT FAKE SEIZURES I WILL NOT FAKE SEIZURES I WILL

Re: RFS: fpm2 - a password manager

OoO En ce début d'après-midi ensoleillé du jeudi 08 mai 2008, vers 15:35, Wen-Yen Chuang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > Description: a password manager - metapackage > Figaro's Password Manager 2 (FPM2) is a drop-in replacement for fpm. > . > This package can be purged at anytime once the

Re: RFS: unshield (updated and adopted package)

OoO Peu avant le début de l'après-midi du jeudi 08 mai 2008, vers 13:22, Evgeni Golov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > Dear mentors, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.1-1 > of my package "unshield". Hi Evgeni! I see no problem with this package. Let's wait tomorrow if someone el

Re: RFS: dynamite (updated and adopted package)

OoO Peu avant le début de l'après-midi du jeudi 08 mai 2008, vers 13:22, Evgeni Golov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.1-1 > of my package "dynamite". Hi Evgeni! As new maintainer, you should acknowledge NMU (#259294). I think that you should Bu

Re: RFS: orange (updated and adopted package)

OoO Peu avant le début de l'après-midi du jeudi 08 mai 2008, vers 13:23, Evgeni Golov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > Dear mentors, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.1-1 > of my package "orange". > Please note, that you will need the just posted new versions > of libunshield and l

Re: RFS: dynamite (updated and adopted package)

OoO La nuit ayant déjà recouvert d'encre ce jour du jeudi 08 mai 2008, vers 23:27, Evgeni Golov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> And add an Homepage field in debian/control (I have also forgotten this >> for unshield !). > Well, with which value? I thought about it before > uploading, but www.sy

Re: RFS: fpm2 - a password manager

OoO En ce doux début de matinée du vendredi 09 mai 2008, vers 08:40, Wen-Yen Chuang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > The updated package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fp

Re: RFS: orange (updated and adopted package)

OoO En cette matinée ensoleillée du vendredi 09 mai 2008, vers 09:11, Evgeni Golov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > * Added Homepage > * Removed sample > * machine-readable copyright > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/orange/orange_0.3.1-1.dsc > I still don't think I should add genera

Re: RFS: fpm2 - a password manager

OoO En cette fin de matinée radieuse du vendredi 09 mai 2008, vers 11:21, Wen-Yen Chuang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > I guess your lintian is newer than 1.23.48? No, I have 1.23.48. But I use "-viI" as args. > Anyway, since Encoding is a deprecated key, I am happy to remove it. > The Enc

Re: RFS: snmpdump

OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du samedi 10 mai 2008, vers 17:19, Georgi Chulkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > Dear mentors, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "snmpdump". Hi Georgi! I am commenting on this package and libanon too. Please, file an ITP when working on a package.

Re: RFS: ffmpegthumbnailer

OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du samedi 10 mai 2008, vers 18:06, Lionel Le Folgoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ffmpegthumbnailer". > This is a lightweight video thumbnailer that can be used by file > managers to create thumbnails for video files

Re: RFS: parcellite

OoO En cette nuit striée d'éclairs du dimanche 11 mai 2008, vers 02:40, Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> Thanks for the review Vincent and Michal. Sorry about the delay in >> responding. I forgot to subscribe to the list, so I just saw your >> comments when checking the archives. > I've upl

Re: RFS: figtoipe

OoO En ce début d'après-midi ensoleillé du dimanche 11 mai 2008, vers 15:39, Alexander Bürger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > The figtoipe program had previously been included in the ipe package, > but after ipe version 6.0pre28, this is no longer true. Any reason why? -- panic("CPU too expensi

Re: RFS: figtoipe

OoO En ce début d'après-midi ensoleillé du dimanche 11 mai 2008, vers 15:39, Alexander Bürger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > Dear mentors, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "figtoipe". Hi Alexander! Fill an ITP when working on a package and close it in your changelog. If figtoipe wa

Re: RFS: parcellite

OoO En ce milieu de nuit étoilée du lundi 12 mai 2008, vers 04:47, Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > This has also been fixed. > The changes have been uploaded: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/parcellite Uploaded. Thanks! -- prom_printf("Detected PenguinPages, getting ou

Re: Lost Labyrinth

OoO En ce début d'après-midi nuageux du lundi 12 mai 2008, vers 14:10, Markus Döbele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > I am new to this list so I first want to say hello to everybody. > Since a few days we can compile our game Lost Labyrinth with a free compiler. > So the whole game is open source

Re: Lost Labyrinth

OoO En ce début d'après-midi nuageux du lundi 12 mai 2008, vers 14:46, je disais: >> I am new to this list so I first want to say hello to everybody. >> Since a few days we can compile our game Lost Labyrinth with a free >> compiler. >> So the whole game is open source now. >> It is written i

Re: RFS: figtoipe

OoO En cette matinée pluvieuse du mardi 13 mai 2008, vers 10:14, Alexander Bürger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> Fill an ITP when working on a package and close it in your changelog. > I submitted one, so I can close #481022 in the changelog. >> ... figtoipe was provided by ipe in the pa

Re: RFS: xinha

OoO En cette soirée bien amorcée du lundi 12 mai 2008, vers 22:48, "Mathieu PARENT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xinha". > * Package name: xinha > Version : 0.95~rc2-1 > * URL : http://xinha.webfactional.com/ > * License

Re: RFS: nlkt

OoO La nuit ayant déjà recouvert d'encre ce jour du lundi 12 mai 2008, vers 23:32, "Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > * Package name: nlkt > Version : 0.3.1.1-2 > Upstream Author : Eugene V. Lyubimkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://sourceforge.n

Re: RFS: nautilus-clamscan

OoO En ce début de soirée du mardi 13 mai 2008, vers 21:55, Clement Lorteau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nautilus-clamscan". > * Package name: nautilus-clamscan > Version : 0.2.1-1 > Upstream Author : Clement Lorteau <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: RFS: lynis (updated package)

OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du mercredi 14 mai 2008, vers 00:15, Francisco García <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > Dear mentors, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.2-1 > of my package "lynis". Hi Francisco! You might want to remove the fact that debian/rules is a sample fi

Re: RFS: debpool (updated package)

OoO En cette aube naissante du mercredi 14 mai 2008, vers 07:16, Andres Mejia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.0 of the package > "debpool". > I think Magnus (co-maintainer) has been very busy so I'm looking for a > sponsor at mentors.debian.net

Re: RFS: nautilus-clamscan

OoO En ce début de soirée du mercredi 14 mai 2008, vers 21:27, Clement Lorteau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > Thank you for the review. I followed your recommendations and uploaded > the new package to debian.mentors.net. See my comments below. You can use "test_files/*" for debian/nautilus-c

Re: RFS: orange (updated and adopted package)

OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du jeudi 15 mai 2008, vers 00:00, Evgeni Golov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> I am not sure either. Maybe there is an exception. You can ask on >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > As you have seen, I've posted to debian-legal with no reply (except of > yours). It seems t

Re: RFS: nlkt

OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du jeudi 15 mai 2008, vers 00:03, "Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> You should keep the changelog with only one entry (Initial release) >> since this is a new package for Debian. You should also file an ITP and >> close it. > Done. Your debi

Re: RFS: figtoipe

OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du vendredi 16 mai 2008, vers 16:45, Alexander Bürger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> > I do not understand Replaces/Conflicts very well. >> >> You should. ;-) >> >> Conflicts avoids that your package is installed along with another >> package. Replaces a

Re: RFS: figtoipe

OoO En cette fin de matinée radieuse du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 11:17, Alexander Bürger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> When using Conflicts and having files in common with the other package, >> you need Replaces as well. Otherwise, during upgrade, the user may see >> error messages about you

Re: RFS: nlkt

OoO Pendant le temps de midi du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 12:06, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> Your debian version should be 0.3.1.1-1 (not -3) since this is the first >> one for 0.3.1.1 upstream version. > Vincent - just a note, other sponsors have different preferences and it

Re: RFS: nlkt

OoO Peu avant le début de l'après-midi du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 13:05, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> There must be a problem with this page. It does not have any content. > It's fine - check your browser settings and refresh the page (or just go > to the page itself: htt

Re: RFS: opus, uuwaf

Hi Colin! OoO Peu avant le début de l'après-midi du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 13:43, Colin Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "uuwaf" (see opus previously). > * Package name: uuwaf > Version : 1.0.1-2 > Upstream Author : Colin Turn

Re: RFS: opus, uuwaf

OoO En ce début d'après-midi ensoleillé du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 15:53, Colin Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> I don't really understand why you did split the package into two binary >> packages. Why not just put everything in uuwaf? Why would people only >> install uuwaf? If

Re: RFS: figtoipe

OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 16:02, Vincent Fourmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > Vincent Bernat wrote: >> The valid way to replace a file without conflicting with a package is to >> use diversion. This is not a solution in yo

Re: RFS: nlkt

OoO Pendant le repas du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 19:32, "Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> Why do you ship those files with Debian package and not as upstream? >> share/default_profiles/de-debian-hints |1 >> share/default_profiles/debian-hints|1 >> share/la

Re: RFS: opus, uuwaf

OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 18:00, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> > The reason is that some other applications we have depend upon the >> > framework, but don't use the preferences system. > IMHO a good enough reason for a package split. No other ex

Re: RFS: figtoipe

OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 17:57, Armin Berres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > Replaces must not come with Conflicts. > Consider a package foo which contains a lot of architecture independent > files. One day you decide to split the arch independent files into a new

Re: RFS: opus, uuwaf

OoO Pendant le journal télévisé du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 20:43, Colin Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > You're more or less correct. uuwaf itself provides an abstraction to the > client handling of the database, allowing an easy method for multiple > connections to potentially different type

Re: RFS: nlkt

OoO Pendant le journal télévisé du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 20:23, "Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> Well, this is not really important, but for example, there is no >> difference between debian-hints and en in default_profiles. > Do you think is there any sense

Re: RFS: nlkt

OoO En ce début de soirée du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 21:01, "Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> I did not upload the package, you left the tags in debian/control. > :(. Fixed, uploaded. Uploaded. Thanks! -- # Basic IBM dingbats, some of which will never have a purpose clea

Re: RFS: figtoipe

OoO En cette soirée bien amorcée du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 22:02, Alexander Bürger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> ... diversion for the file is probably the right way to go. > A new package using dpkg-divert instead of "Replaces:" has been uploaded > to mentors.debian.net, and I would be h

Re: RFS: figtoipe

OoO La nuit ayant déjà recouvert d'encre ce jour du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 23:10, Alexander Bürger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> You should divert the manpage too. > Oh yes, sorry. >> ... modifying upstream ... > Well, as I am also the upstream maintainer it would be strange to add a > pat

Re: RFS: opus, uuwaf

OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du lundi 19 mai 2008, vers 00:08, Colin Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/uuwaf > The respective dsc file can be found at: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/uuwaf/uuwaf_1.0.1-3.dsc Seems fine to me. But

Re: RFS: obm

OoO En ce début d'après-midi ensoleillé du mardi 20 mai 2008, vers 15:18, Sylvain Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> When upgrading packages, it is customary to be able to upgrade >> conffiles. You use an alternate mechanism that install configuration >> files only on first inst

Re: RFS: chironfs - Chiron FS is a FUSE based filesystem that implements replication #475371

OoO En ce début de soirée du mercredi 14 mai 2008, vers 21:39, "Leonardo Rodrigues de Mello" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > * Package name: chironfs > Version : 1.0.0-1 > Upstream Author : Luis Otavio de Colla Furquim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://furquim.org/chir

Re: RFS: obm

OoO En cette matinée ensoleillée du mercredi 21 mai 2008, vers 09:47, Sylvain Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> I am still very uncomfortable with obm-conf package. You should let >> debconf handle any reconfiguration/first configuration stuff. It won't >> ask questions twice if not

Re: RFS: figtoipe

OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du mercredi 21 mai 2008, vers 01:02, Alexander Bürger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> Did you release a new package with the fix? > Yes, Otfried has uploaded a new version and I just uploaded the new > package to mentors.debian.net. The diff now only modifies de

Re: RFS: opus, uuwaf

OoO La nuit ayant déjà recouvert d'encre ce jour du mardi 20 mai 2008, vers 23:04, Colin Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > The new files are uploaded. Thanks. Hi Colin! We nearly at the end. There are just a few lintian warnings: you should depend on ucf for opus binary package. And you

Re: RFS: fig2sxd

OoO En ce début de soirée du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 21:32, Alexander Bürger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > Dear mentors, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fig2sxd". > * Package name: fig2sxd > Version : 0.18-1 > Upstream Author : myself > * URL : http://f

Re: RFS: xinha

OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du mardi 20 mai 2008, vers 18:38, "Mathieu PARENT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> For debian/rules, use "install" file instead of "cp". That's not very > Not done (how to install directories ?) Hi Mathieu! Use "dirs" file. Well, this is a matter of tas

Re: RFS: phpmyvisites -- free web analytics

OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du jeudi 15 mai 2008, vers 01:02, Frederic Lehobey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "phpmyvisites". Hi Frederic! php4 will not be part of lenny, therefore, you can remove php4 dependencies. Moreover, php5 depends on

Re: RFS: fig2sxd

OoO En ce début de soirée du mercredi 21 mai 2008, vers 21:58, Alexander Bürger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> ... acknowledge ... NMU ... > I thought so too, but I did not know what to write there, so I skipped > it. Maybe "thanks for the NMU of 0.17-1.1"? I can hardly put > "(Closes: 455650)"

Re: Bug#448532: RFS: phpmyvisites -- free web analytics

OoO La nuit ayant déjà recouvert d'encre ce jour du mercredi 21 mai 2008, vers 23:30, Frederic Lehobey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> About debian/copyright, you cannot ship files using PHP License 2.02 or >> PHP License 3.0. This will be rejected by ftp-master. > That is what I feared

Re: RFS: opus, uuwaf

OoO La nuit ayant déjà recouvert d'encre ce jour du mercredi 21 mai 2008, vers 23:42, Colin Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> We nearly at the end. There are just a few lintian warnings: you should >> depend on ucf for opus binary package. And you should move texlive in >> Build-Depen

Re: RFS: fig2sxd

OoO En cette matinée ensoleillée du jeudi 22 mai 2008, vers 09:12, Alexander Bürger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > I uploaded a new version to mentors.debian.net. The changelog entry now > looks like: > * Set numeric locale to "C" at startup. > * Fix text placement problems by explicitly

Re: RFS: opus, uuwaf

OoO En cette matinée pluvieuse du jeudi 22 mai 2008, vers 10:12, Colin Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > He was indeed, and mentors had stopped processing the inbound queue, but > all is well again now. Hi Colin! I have uploaded both packages to ftp-master. They should sit in NEW in a short

Re: RFS: poco and poco-doc (updated packages) [3rd try]

OoO En ce début d'après-midi ensoleillé du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 15:51, "Krzysztof Burghardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > It builds these binary packages: > libpoco5-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components > libpocodata5 - The C++ Portable Components Data library >

Re: RFS: lsat

OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du lundi 19 mai 2008, vers 17:21, Juan Angulo Moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lsat" (My sponsor is very busy). > * Package name: lsat > Version : 0.9.7.1-1 > Upstream Author : Triode <[EMAIL PROTECTE

  1   2   3   4   5   >