Re: more recent version with python3 support

2016-07-12 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Hi Herbert, On 12 July 2016 at 16:46, Herbert Fortes wrote: > This new version has support for python3, as > said in setup.py, so I created debian/*.install > files and edited debian/control and debian/rules. What are the contents of "debian/*.install" files? I have packaged a Python library wh

Dealing with "duplicate-font-file" lintian warning

2016-07-22 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Hi, I'm updating the "grip" package (bug #832000[1]), which resulted in the following lintian warning: W: grip: duplicate-font-file usr/share/grip/grip/static/octicons/octicons.ttf also in fonts-octicons Is there a helper to deal with this kind of issue? Like the "sphinxdoc"[2] one, which automa

Re: Dealing with "duplicate-font-file" lintian warning

2016-07-22 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Hi Dimitry, On 22 July 2016 at 17:05, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > `apt-get install dh-linktree`. Usage is simple, documentation is good, > but you can take a look as example at cdist_4.2.1-1. Thank you. That did the trick[1]. > Unfortunately, dh-linktree is not magic, and you have manually > specif

Bug#832585: RFS: gammaray/2.5.0-1 [RC] -- Tool for examining the internals of Qt application

2016-07-27 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Gianfranco, On 27 July 2016 at 08:34, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-kde/kde-extras/gammaray.git > Vcs-Browser: > https://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-kde/kde-extras/gammaray.git > > they seem both wrong, please fix (the second one needs /cgit/, the fi

Re: Making a package that amounts to GBs of .wavs data?

2015-10-28 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Hi Victor and Gianfranco, There was some related discussion here about downloader packages[1] a couple months ago. I guess a separate package for downloading the drum kits recordings, which can be added as dependency for either DrumGizmo and Beast, would fit this use case. Regards, Tiago. [1]: h

Re: Packaging an apparently unreleased Git repository

2016-01-28 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Jan, On 28 January 2016 at 06:46, Jan Dittberner wrote: > Otherwise you should not just name the package 0.2.0-x but make sure that > you include the git commit id like: > > 0.2.0~git20160116.1.fa5b38f-1 > > This version will sort before a real 0.2.0 version: > > (...) > > This will allow you to

Re: Packaging an apparently unreleased Git repository

2016-01-28 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Gert, On 28 January 2016 at 15:49, Gert Wollny wrote: > Hello Tiago, > > Since git is a distributed VCS, a given date might not be sufficient to > get the exact version, because some developer might edit the source off > -line, and push changes on a later date to the remote repo, but the > commit

Including "orig.tar.gz" for upload with gbp/git-buildpackage

2016-01-29 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Hi, I've tried to upload a backport to mentors.d.n a few moments ago and it got rejected with the following error: "If you tried to upload a package which only increased the Debian revision part, make sure you include the full source (pass -sa to dpkg-buildpackage)" The manpage for "dpkg-buildpa

Re: Including "orig.tar.gz" for upload with gbp/git-buildpackage

2016-01-30 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Hi Gianfranco, On 30 January 2016 at 06:25, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, > > gbp buildpackage -S -sa works for me. > > Mentors strips binaries, so I don't understand why to call it with pbuilder :) Mostly because using "USE_PDEBUILD_INTERNAL=yes" in "~/.pbuilderrc" I don't have to install

Re: Including "orig.tar.gz" for upload with gbp/git-buildpackage

2016-02-01 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Gianfranco, On 1 February 2016 at 11:36, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > this is annoying for me too, but I usually keep them installed or I remove > them after > sponsoring the package. > (for uploading I use source-only if possible, pbuilder, or DebOMatic as > fallbacks) If it annoys me havin

Bug#814864: RFS: zbackup/1.4.4-1~bpo8+1

2016-02-15 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zbackup" * Package name: zbackup Version : 1.4.4-1~bpo8+1 Upstream Author : Vladimir Stackov * URL : http://zbackup.org/ * License : GPL-2+-openssl Sec

Bug#814864: RFS: zbackup/1.4.4-1~bpo8+1

2016-02-17 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Gianfranco, On 17 February 2016 at 13:57, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, I removed you from uploaders (it has to be a no-change bpo, and nobody > should care about lintian). This is something that I had talked with Antonio Terceiro in private when we were dealing with another backport. The

Packaging pythonpy

2016-03-10 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Hi, I'm packaging a Python application named "pythonpy"[1] (ITP bug #817856[2]). It has been uploaded to mentors[3] and there's a repository on GitHub[4]. There's a few things which aren't fixed yet, which I would welcome help, like: - A lintian error "python-script-but-no-python-dep" is being s

Re: Packaging pythonpy

2016-03-11 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Hi Ben, On 10 March 2016 at 22:19, Ben Finney wrote: > Not by itself. You need to run something that will actually use that > substitution variable. > > By default you should be using Pybuild in new packages for Python code. > This will bring many benefits, including interpolate the substvars for

Fwd: Packaging pythonpy

2016-03-19 Thread Tiago Ilieve
ors/2016/03/msg00223.html -- Forwarded message -- From: Tiago Ilieve Date: 11 March 2016 at 11:55 Subject: Re: Packaging pythonpy To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Hi Ben, On 10 March 2016 at 22:19, Ben Finney wrote: > Not by itself. You need to run something that will actu

Re: Packaging pythonpy

2016-03-24 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Hi, Can someone please help me on this one? I'm pretty close to finish the initial packaging work. After fixing the following issues, it will be a matter of adding a manpage and filling a RFS. * How to fix the "python-script-but-no-python-dep" lintian error? I've tried with and without pybuild an

Re: Packaging pythonpy

2016-03-25 Thread Tiago Ilieve
ff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index f0c1b3f..5205298 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ Section: python Priority: optional Maintainer: Tiago Ilieve Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), + dh-python, python (>= 2.7.3),

Re: Packaging pythonpy

2016-03-25 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Hi Gianfranco, On 25 March 2016 at 16:21, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/pythonpy/0.4.4-1/lintian > please dget it from there and start again :) > > I fixed a lot of issues, and many more are there now! I really appreciate your effort in tr

Re: Packaging pythonpy

2016-03-25 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Gianfranco, On 25 March 2016 at 19:07, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > up to your sponsor :) Tried one or two new approaches and it didn't worked. In the I've created a patch[1] changing "#!/usr/bin/env python2" to "#!/usr/bin/env python". This should work as long as Python 2 is the default inter

Bug#819289: RFS: pythonpy/0.4.10-1 [ITP]

2016-03-25 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pythonpy" * Package name: pythonpy Version : 0.4.10-1 Upstream Author : Russell Stewart * URL : https://github.com/Russell91/pythonpy * License : MIT S

Bug#819289: RFS: pythonpy/0.4.10-1 [ITP]

2016-03-25 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Hi, I've forgot to mention in the bug report that there's a Git repository[1] for the package (as stated in debian/control). It would be awesome if my sponsor is also able to help me to move it to "collab-maint", which I already have write permissions. Regards, Tiago. [1]: https://github.com/myh

Bug#819773: RFS: python-path-and-address/1.0.0-1 [ITP]

2016-04-01 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-path-and-address" * Package name: python-path-and-address Version : 1.0.0-1 Upstream Author : Joe Esposito * URL

Minor issues with collab-maint

2016-04-02 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Hi, I'm having some minor issues with collab-maint today and didn't found where to report it properly. There's a "collab-maint-devel"[1] list, but there isn't any activity in there since June/2009. Please point me to the correct mailing list if this isn't the proper one. * The HTTP certificate f

Bug#819773: RFS: python-path-and-address/1.0.0-1 [ITP]

2016-04-02 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Hi, I've updated the package to the version "1.1.0" which the upstream kindly released after integrating my patch fixing some issues with tests under Python 3. It was uploaded to mentors.d.n[1] as well. Regards, Tiago. [1]: http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-path-and-address -- Tiago "M

Re: Minor issues with collab-maint

2016-04-02 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Hi Alex, On 2 April 2016 at 05:32, Alexander Wirt wrote: > That was a misconfiguration of mine. It is fixed by now. Thank you for taking a look at it so quickly. Now it is using a short-lived Let's Encrypt certificate. :-) Regards, Tiago. -- Tiago "Myhro" Ilieve Blog: https://blog.myhro.info/

Bug#820029: RFS: grip/4.1.0-1 [ITP]

2016-04-04 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "grip" * Package name: grip Version : 4.1.0-1 Upstream Author : Joe Esposito * URL : https://github.com/joeyespo/grip

Bug#819773: RFS: python-path-and-address/1.0.0-1 [ITP]

2016-04-04 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Hi Mattia, On 4 April 2016 at 18:25, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > I usually prefer using git to do my stuff, though here a simple clone is > not enough: > > mattia@chase ~/devel/RFS/python-path-and-address % git clone > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/python-path-and-address.git > Cloning

Bug#819773: RFS: python-path-and-address/1.0.0-1 [ITP]

2016-04-04 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Mattia, On 4 April 2016 at 21:37, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > yep, saw the mail that day, but didn't pay much attention back then. There's no problem. > This is basically a security feature, I think, not a bug. > > Though you should be able to fix it more manually by directly editing > the HEAD fil

Bug#820029: RFS: grip/4.1.0-1 [ITP]

2016-04-04 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Hi Mattia, On 4 April 2016 at 22:04, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > meh, there is git, let me use it! > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/grip.git Actually, it would be pretty nice if the RFS template grabbed the "Vcs-Git" field. I'll remember to add it manually in the next time. > Though as

Bug#820029: RFS: grip/4.1.0-1 [ITP]

2016-04-05 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Hi Mattia, As the new version of "python-responses" has hit unstable, the test were enabled with the following patch: http://paste.debian.net/424537/ The "--ignore=tests/test_cli.py" argument was added because this file consists of functional tests (DEP-8) that should not run on build time. The

Bug#820029: RFS: grip/4.1.0-1 [ITP]

2016-04-06 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Mattia, On 6 April 2016 at 09:49, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > you forgot to add python-path-and-address and python3-path-and-address > to build-deps. Indeed. "python3-requests" was missing as well. Notice that building it again on a clean sid install. > And also I now notice that you're missing a p

Bug#820029: RFS: grip/4.1.0-1 [ITP]

2016-04-06 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Hi Mattia, On 6 April 2016 at 13:24, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > umh, reading it like that looks to me that it runs against the sources > only. Am I wrong? DEP-8 tests should test against the installed > packages. Although written in a conventional "test_*.py" file, all the tests in there calls th

Bug#820029: RFS: grip/4.1.0-1 [ITP]

2016-04-06 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Mattia, On 6 April 2016 at 19:58, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > I see, cool. > > Then, uploaded :) I saw that it is now on the NEW queue. Thank you very much! P.s.: can you please push the release tag to the collab-maint repo? :-) Regards, Tiago. -- Tiago "Myhro" Ilieve Blog: https://blog.myhro.in

Re: Bug#819681: RFS: python-django-gravatar2/1.4.0-1 [ITP]

2016-04-07 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Hi Pierre-Elliott, On 7 April 2016 at 07:03, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > Dear mentors, > > So far it appears that I got no reply. I'm trying a small bump in hope that > somebody will get interested because of my motivation, or that somebody that > missed my first mail will see this one! :) I c

Bug#820029: RFS: grip/4.1.0-1 [ITP]

2016-04-07 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Mattia, On 7 April 2016 at 06:34, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Oops, I completely forgot to tag, actually! > > pushed :) > > Usually I do it before uploading but boo No problem. Thanks again! :-) Regards, Tiago. -- Tiago "Myhro" Ilieve Blog: https://blog.myhro.info/ GitHub: https://github.com/myhr

Re: Bug#819681: RFS: python-django-gravatar2/1.4.0-1 [ITP]

2016-04-07 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Pierre-Elliott, On 7 April 2016 at 12:27, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > You're right, but I'm an "explicit is better than implicit guy". :) I guess this is not a case of "explicit vs. implicit". Imagine the entire line as an URL: https://github.com/P-EB/python-django-gravatar2.git%20-b%20master

Bug#820733: RFS: Series/1.0 [ITP] -- Keep track of your favourite TV series

2016-04-11 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Hi Sartore, On 11 April 2016 at 16:36, Sartore Giorgio (Mani) wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "series": > > Package name: series > Version : 1.0 > Upstream Author : Sartore Giorgio > URL : https://github.com/Mani-GS/series.git > Licens

Re: Bug#819681: RFS: python-django-gravatar2/1.4.0-1 [ITP]

2016-04-11 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Hi Pierre-Elliott, On 11 April 2016 at 14:05, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > In that case, if the main branch wasn't `master` the issue would be the > same, yet you'd need the `-b` option. That's my view of explicit V.S. > implicit, you'd have something working based on an assumed behaviour. Ther

Bug#820900: RFS: [ITP] python-hashids/1.1.0-1

2016-04-13 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Hi Edward, Nice job! A simple and properly packaged Python library. I have absolutely nothing to ask to be changed. I'd upload it if I had upload rights... :-) P.s.: I see that you have an "@debian.org" address in your DDPO page. Aren't you a DD anymore? Regards, Tiago. -- Tiago "Myhro" Iliev

Bug#820900: RFS: [ITP] python-hashids/1.1.0-1

2016-04-14 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Paul, On 14 April 2016 at 01:17, Paul Wise wrote: > check-all-the-things and lintian print a number of things that could > be polished. What are you seeing on lintian? I hasn't showed anything besides "debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature" (using display-experimental/display-info/pedantic) to me

Bug#820900: RFS: [ITP] python-hashids/1.1.0-1

2016-04-14 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Gianfranco, On 14 April 2016 at 09:25, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > apt-get install check-all-the-things -t experimental Thank you. I didn't knew that it was available on experimental only. $ sudo apt install check-all-the-things (...) Need to get 566 MB of archives. After this operation, 2,3

Bug#821236: RFS: netsed/1.2-2

2016-04-17 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Hi Mats, I've reviewed your package. It's in a good state, but there's a few things you might wanna take a look at: * debian/control: - Is "dpkg-dev" really a dependency? - Please run "wrap-and-sort -a" to sort the build dependencies. - The URL in "Vcs-Browser" can be the same as "Vcs-Git".

Bug#819681: RFS: python-django-gravatar2/1.4.0-1 [ITP]

2016-04-20 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Nicolas, On 20 April 2016 at 03:49, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote: > Tiago, when replying to a RFS, please use the bug report rather than the > mailing list. Yeah, I've only noticed this after my last message in the thread. Now I figured that this happened because I've replied his second message, whi

Re: request more advice: lintian warnings and python-tldp + ldp-docbook-stylesheets

2016-04-28 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Martin, On 28 April 2016 at 07:51, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > yep, for signing on github, just sign it, and in "releases" tab you should > have some "upload additional files" > where you can upload it (I'm going through my memory) This process is documented on wiki.d.o[1], although worth me

Bug#823742: RFS: hdf-compass/0.6.0b5-1 [ITP]

2016-05-15 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Mattia, On 15 May 2016 at 16:24, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > * d/hdf-compass.lintian-overrides > + bad habit doing lintian overrides without a comment. But I can't > imagine a reason to override binary-without-manpage. That one just > needs fixing, and hiding it behind an override doesn't

Binaries under "/usr/lib/"

2016-05-16 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Hi Mattia, (Moving the discussion from BTS to "debian-mentors" mailing list.) On 15 May 2016 at 20:25, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > In this case the binary should go into /usr/lib instead. That place > exist exactly for this reason: > "/usr/lib includes object files, libraries, and internal binaries

Re: Binaries under "/usr/lib/"

2016-05-18 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Hi Ben, On 17 May 2016 at 21:06, Ben Finney wrote: > How many process calls are there? The ideal solution IMO is to: Not much of them. In my case, there's just one. I was thinking about a corner case, where there would be multiple process calls, possible making a patch like this somewhat hard to

Re: Bug#823478: python3-protobuf3

2016-05-18 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Jonathon, On 18 May 2016 at 05:52, Jonathon Love wrote: >> umh, you force pushed everything, master, upstream and pristine-tar >> branches. WHY? what did you do? > > oh, sorry, i never intended for you to look at that repo, assuming you'd > look at the debian-mentors one. This is something I'v

Re: Binaries under "/usr/lib/"

2016-05-19 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Giulio, On 18 May 2016 at 07:15, Giulio Paci wrote: > One approach that usually fits my needs is the one proposed by Thibaut > Paumard [1], that I am reproposing here with minimal changes: Thanks for sharing this pretty detailed case. As my issue with "pythonpy" was way more simpler, I ended up

Re: add missing pristine-tar

2016-05-20 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Hi Nico, On 20 May 2016 at 08:10, Nico Schlömer wrote: > Thanks for the hint. > Unfortunately, it's not working dpt picks up an older version that already > is in pristine-tar and adds another commit for it (bug?), but leaves out the > version for which there is no pristine-tar. > > Any other sug