Hi Jelmer,
On Saturday 19 January 2008 18:25, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "line6-usb".
The package looks good, I've uploaded it. Good work!
Thijs
pgp0zj8VBqUoo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thursday 24 January 2008 04:40, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> > * Vcs-Svn and Vcs-Browser.
>
> Shouldn't the Vcs-Svn entry start with "svn:" instead of "http:"?
SVN can be run over a variety of protocols, next to svn including ssh and
http(s). Which is an excellent feature if you ask me :-)
On Sunday 3 February 2008 17:04, Barry deFreese wrote:
> I've made a QA upload for workbone that closes the RC bug if someone
> could review/upload I would appreciate it.
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/workbone/workbone_2.40-8.dsc
Thanks - I'm building this now and will upload it
On Mon, February 4, 2008 14:21, José Luis Tallón wrote:
> Any of you with "upload powers" has some time left to sign and
> upload some packages?
>
> I have a little too many bugs waiting for an upload to be fixed,
> some of them quite old already. My usual sponsors have been much too busy
> as of l
On Wed, February 13, 2008 07:24, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Test time on arch (build time)
> 1h05 on sparc (3 min),
> 37 min on mipsel (2 min),
> 39 min on mips (3 min),
> 37 min on powerpc (2 min),
> 19 min on hppa (2 min),
> 6 min on amd64 (1 min)â¦
>
>
> Of course, if this is an exception, there i
On Wed, February 13, 2008 11:34, Charles Plessy wrote:
> And another one, who was never built in mips, is number 509 in the queue
> (glam2).
>
> For njplot, the waiting time is already 29 days. Therefore, I am a bit
> doubtful that we have enough build power. Would we have, my original
> question w
Hi J.L.,
On Sunday 9 March 2008 01:57, José Luis Tallón wrote:
> * imapproxy 1.2.6-1
> http://devel.adv-solutions.net/debian/pool/main/mail/imapproxy/up-imapproxy
>_1.2.6-1.dsc
I've taken a look at this one. It looks good in general, thanks for your work
on this! There's just a couple of minor t
On Sunday 9 March 2008 13:14, José Luis Tallón wrote:
> Indeed. "Make clean" (as shipped by upstream) always fails, and so the
> error needs to be ignored for the build to succeed --- what it does is
> however needed for a package build to complete.
>
> I don't normally like lintian overrides, but
Hi Peter,
On Monday 10 March 2008 15:25, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my updated package "tcpser".
I've uploaded this package for you now. Thanks for your work, and sorry that
it took so long for someone to pick it up.
One point: upstream has included all .svn dir
On Sunday 9 March 2008 13:14, José Luis Tallón wrote:
> > * You accidentally left out the -10.2 NMU changelog entry. Please
> > reinclude it so that an accurate overview of package history remains. You
> > can see this when you do a "debdiff" between the archive version of
> > imapproxy (apt-get so
Hi J.L.,
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 02:53, José Luis Tallón wrote:
> - Couriergraph
> - Bindgraph
You got a sponsorship offer for these here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=468134#15
Thijs
pgpxdDBKoKrLS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tuesday 6 May 2008 12:45, Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik wrote:
> Is there a way to get the Debian version as a variable in the rules
> file? Is there a standard way to remove the .dsfg from it?
The following works well for me. I'm not sure but I don't believe
there's a more 'standard' way. To remove th
On Monday 12 May 2008 06:17, Ben Finney wrote:
> In recent years I've seen entries in 'debian/changelog' that are
> broken up into "sections" by developer name. I'm referring to entries
> like this:
> The Policy section above is silent on this extension to the format,
> though I've seen Joey Hess
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 13:24, Ben Finney wrote:
> I'm less interested in strictness in Policy than I am in finding out
> how this is *specified* for all consumers, rather than merely
> *implemented* in specific programs.
Maybe you can specify what problem you are trying to solve.
Thijs
--
To
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 16:28, Ben Finney wrote:
> All the answers I've had so far indicate that there *is* no
> specification for developer names within a changelog entry, and that
> any format at all is allowed so long as the loose definition in Policy
> is followed.
>
> My issue with that is that
Hi Richard,
On Tuesday 5 August 2008 14:02, Richard Hurt wrote:
> I am getting quite a few lintian warnings that I would like to quell.
> Do we have any best practices on how to deal with these messages?
>
> W: : debian-copyright-line-too-long -- As I understand it
> long lines are now OK. I am
Hi,
On Wednesday 13 August 2008 00:41, Andreas Wenning wrote:
> You should add a debian/watch file to the package. Due to the RC/beta
> packages at the site the content of the file should probably look
> something like (possibly improvable):
>
> version=3
> opts="uversionmangle=s/-(alpha|beta|RC)/
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 13:02, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> the new policy version 3.8.0 recommends a README.source that describes
> how to use the patch system. I'm using dpatch and I thought the dpatch
> maintainer publish a README.source with their package. But it didn't
> happen until now. Does anyon
On Wednesday 27 August 2008 09:09, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:26:06PM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote [edited]:
> > But since the release team decided that rng is 'unfit for release' and
> > blocked rng, it won't enter testing even if you NMU the bug.
>
> For future referen
On Wednesday 27 August 2008 19:02, Neil Williams wrote:
> 3. You're asking for sponsorship of PHP packages which are a security
> nightmare (esp. wordpress that had a huge flamewar around the time of
> the Etch release due to security issues). Many sponsors are justifiably
> wary of PHP packages af
On Wednesday 27 August 2008 20:23, Neil Williams wrote:
> > Plus, I've surely not seen anyone being "flamed [...] by the security
> > team", let alone "to crisp",
>
> (Some of that happened off-list and one of the people involved is
> well-known to me due to interests outside Debian. I can vouch th
On Mon, September 22, 2008 08:11, Kel Modderman wrote:
> On Monday 22 September 2008 15:20:20 Cameron Dale wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Thomas Goirand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We've been using apt-proxy for about a year, and then found it quite
>>> buggy. So we moved to
Hi Jonathan,
On Thu, January 8, 2009 07:26, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire
> wrote:
>> I have uploaded whohas 0.22-1 to m.d.n, which is a new upstream
>> integrating a lot of the bugs, and some tweaks to the packaging because
>> of his changes.
Great. As I
On Thu, January 8, 2009 11:19, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Devref mentions NEWS.Debian as a changelog supplement: "This is the
> preferred means to let the user know [...] changes in a package" [1]. I
> didn't use README.Debian as the same paragraph seems to discourage this,
> but if you think it w
On Sun, January 18, 2009 20:04, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 05:24:05PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
using debconf that requires sponsorship, that debconf translations
are requested and updated by the maintainer on an ongoing basis.
>
>>> You mean "that requires [my] sponso
If there is a circular dependency preventing two related packages from going into
testing (both are >=10 days old and valid candidates), will the hint be put in
place automatically or is it down to the maintainer for one or other package to
ask?
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=
Hello Julien,
Here's some more feedback, I hope it's useful.
> Added in SVN [1], I'm waiting for other comments before building another
> package.
You must not install the reportbug hook if you're going to make the
package part of Debian proper, since that will circumvent the BTS.
You might wan
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 12:25 +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> Then it seems logical to me that an override would be in order. However, I
> don't understand what the check is for, if not for cases like these. So my
> logic may very well be incorrect.
Many tests document a short rationale in their descri
On Thu, December 22, 2005 20:01, Rogério Brito wrote:
>> Packages are ready, but vamps can not enter in Debian, because the
>> upstream author don't want to make public his real identity (now in
>> debian/copyright I've a "Vamps Admin ", but this solution does
>> not follow the Debian Policy
>
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 22:14 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> It was deliberate, but not a joke. My point is that there's no
> difference between such names; "Public Flood Software", "FSF", and,
> for example, the "the Debian Installer team" [0].
This is getting a bit off-topic, but from a legal poin
Hi Zakame,
> Hence, I'm needing a sponsor for this package. I hope for your positive
> reply, and contructive comments are very much welcome!!!
Unfortunately I can't upload your package, but a quick review showed me
that the copyright file talks about Ubuntu everywhere, like in "This is
the Ubun
On Tue, January 3, 2006 09:47, Gregor Richards wrote:
> I updated the package to 1.0.0. The version compare algorithm doesn't
> like it ... it thinks that 1.0.0 is less than 1.0.0rc5 ... but that's not
> how release candidates work :)
That's indeed a caveat on the Debian version compare algorithm
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 00:38 +0100, Armin Berres wrote:
> There was _never_ any version of Initng in unstable. The current version
> (uploaded today) doesn't contain the bugs anymore.
>
> > - Can you point me to a bug which is counted as "open" for unstable when
> > it's clearly clearly tagged fi
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 10:00 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > You mean "close" commands...
>
> No, as close commands ARE clearly deprecated as well, and not at all
> equivalent to adding a tag. We are taliking about uploads to experimental,
> after all.
The close command was indeed d
Hello P-A,
> I'm trying to package arpoison 0.6 (arpoison.sf.net). So far, so good:
> everything seems to work. I uploaded it to mentors.debian.net. If any of you
> would like to have a look ..
I have, and here are some results.
* First of all, the package is signed but your key is not signed by
Hello Martin,
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 23:54 +, Martin Meredith wrote:
> Would still love to get this sponsored - Anyone interested ? (forwarding to
> pkg-games-devel too)
>> AABrowse is a Linux-native server browser/query/game-launch
> >> tool for America's Army (http://www.americasarmy.com/)
Hello all,
I could use some advice on bug 307833 (and its duplicates) against
apt-file. Please see the buglog for full context, especially my most
recent message from Jan 26th.
In short, apt-file doesn't work out of the box because it requires curl
but doesn't depend on it. I think that should be
Hello Panu,
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 13:43 +0200, Panu Kalliokoski wrote:
> Hello, I'm interested in becoming a debian developer and I'm looking for
Welcome!
> sponsors. I'm not sure what else I should say; I'm willing to answer
> any questions. The new maintainer's guide says I should find spons
Hello Panu,
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 16:05 +0200, Panu Kalliokoski wrote:
> Where to get it:
> http://sange.fi/~atehwa/debian/b5_2.3.dsc
> http://sange.fi/~atehwa/debian/b5_2.3.tar.gz
> http://sange.fi/~atehwa/debian/b5_2.3_all.deb
> http://sange.fi/~atehwa/debian/b5_2.3_i386.changes
The same goes f
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 17:55 +0200, Panu Kalliokoski wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 04:32:16PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > Native packages should ideally only be packages that have no real use
> > outside of Debian.
>
> Really? I've never seen such a guideline (
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 03:52 +1100, skaller wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 17:12 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>
> > It's your call, but since making them non-native is not really that much
> > more work, I'd recommend doing it that way.
>
> It can be quite a
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 09:13 +0200, Panu Kalliokoski wrote:
> It seems the only sensible way, then, because I really want to include
> the debian/ files in my real release (they contain possibly useful
> metadata, like the changelog, after all).
You would best place the changelog in the root of you
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 22:18 +0800, Hou ZhengPeng wrote:
> I'm looking for a sponsor for the following package:
> ITP : #349997
> Author: casper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> yunfan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Home Page: http://sourceforge.net/projects/evaq
> License: GPL-2
> Source: eva
Where can the source pack
Hello Francesco,
I'm not a DD yet, but I've reviewed your package anyway and here are
some comments:
> This package is in the Requested Packages list:
>
> RFP: libtime-unix-perl -- cross-platform time() for Perl
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=290136
You should retitle
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 17:18 +0100, Marco Cabizza wrote:
> Can anybody review (and hopefully upload) those?
My main concern (apart from the valid hijacking concerns raised) is that
it's a Debian native package. That's not right; you should use an
orig.tar.gz from upstream; even if you pull from CVS
Hello Varun,
> I am looking for a sponser for my package kscoreticker. KScoreTicker is
> a simple applet for KDE that shows the latest cricket scores on the taskbar.
> I am the developer of this package and I would like to maintain it as well.
> The package builds with pbuilder and is lint
Hello Joseph,
> I am looking for a sponsor for texmaker. My files can be found at
> http://josephsmidt.googlepages.com/debianpackages
I've taken a quick look at your package; unfortunately can't upload it for
you but still hope this is useful.
> I relise there is another ITP from Gauvain Pocent
Hey Joseph,
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 16:21 -0600, Joseph Smidt wrote:
> I think I have fixed the problems in my .diff and control files. The
> new files have been uploaded to:
>
> http://josephsmidt.googlepages.com/debianpackages
>
> Hopefully now it is ready to be sponsered. :) Thanks a l
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 10:53 +0800, Hou ZhengPeng wrote:
> Description : Another IM client of SCIM
> Scim-bridge is yet another IM client of SCIM.
> The im-module of scim-bridge communicates with
> scim via socket.
Maybe in the description you can tell us casual bystanders what "SCIM"
is
Hello Felipe,
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 15:13 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Apparently my package is good enough, since it didn't get any more comments
> in my RFC thread [1]. I tried one last time to contact Matt Hope (previous
> checkinstall maintainer), and gave him a week to answer, but he didn't
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 12:52 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Frank Küster wrote:
> > If the place for configuration is mentioned anywhere in the upstream
> > documentation, this is the place to indicate the Debian-specific
> > placement.
> Mmmh, so I put again the file, plus a note on where locales a
On Fri, April 7, 2006 23:24, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> I think that Frank meant to say that if the documentation mentions some
>> place for configuration files, then you should change that part of the
>> documentation instead of providing a separate file.
> I don't think so. AFAIK the package sho
Hello Julien,
On Sun, April 9, 2006 11:17, Julien Louis wrote:
> Some times ago, i asked for a sponsor[1] without any answer. Does anyone
> would
> be interested in sponsoring this package ?
>
> Package is still available at http://ptitlouis.sysif.net/debian/cmus/
The package looks good from a qu
Hello Francesco,
On Sun, April 9, 2006 03:16, Francesco Cecconi wrote:
> Hi all DD,
I'm not a DD so can't upload your package, but here's some small comments:
> Sources:
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/texi2html/
- In debian/copyright you write "The current maintainer is Floria
Hello Nico,
On Sun, April 9, 2006 20:52, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> to make it as easy as possible for purspective package checkers
> if you post an RFS on the -mentors list please put all parts
> of the source package in a directory (FTP or HTTP).
You should use `dget` from the devscripts package
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 20:51 +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > You should use `dget` from the devscripts package. You just pass it the
> > full url to the source package and it gets all other parts; call it with
> > the -x flag to also unpack the package after downloading.
>
> That wont work too in desc
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 11:44 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> All right, I changed the documentation to point to the actual places.
> However, I am doubtful if I should remove the README.Debian, since people
> who had worked with checkinstall (upstream, not Debian's package)
> previously might get con
Hello Franz,
> I'm in search of a sponsor to adopt vim-latexsuite. I've uploaded all
> my files to:
> http://franz-pletz.org/debian/vim-latexsuite/
> The corresponding bug is at:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=307166
>
> Package: vim-latexsuite
> Description: brings t
Hello Antony,
On Thu, April 13, 2006 16:46, Antony Gelberg wrote:
> I have tried to contact Gordon Fraser, wmcalc maintainer, regarding
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=320597, which although
> of important status, renders the package useless to those who expect it to
> calculate
Hello Tyler,
On Tue, April 25, 2006 00:01, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> I'm working on creating .deb packages for one of my projects, with the
> eventual goal of having it included in the debian distribution.
Then you've come to the right place for help :)
I'm out of town, so just some general comme
Hello Ian,
> Templayer is available at: http://excess.org/templayer/
I've taken a look. First, there's no direct link to the source package.
With some manual url manipulation I arrived there
(http://excess.org/dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/) but it's easiest
for a potential sponsor to just prov
Hello Jacob,
> I updated the debianization in the ifpgui source package and got their
> blessing to include it in debian. Could someone review my packaging and
> perhaps upload it for me? :)
>
> You can download it from my web server here:
> http://www.gnifty.net/code/ifpgui-deb/
Thanks. It
On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 16:35 -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> I can't find a consistent rule for what should go into man1 vs. man8. For
> instance, "apt-get" can be used as an unprivileged user to download source
> tarballs, but it's in man8, whereas "defoma-reconfigure", which can only be
> run as r
On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 16:53 -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> OK, so according to that, defoma-reconfigure being in man1 (and
> /usr/bin) is a bug, because nobody but root can use it?
Yes, from a cursory look I think that's a minor bug. You should file it,
if the maintainer disagrees he/she wi
Hello Thierry,
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 18:47 +0300, Thierry Randrianiriana wrote:
> The source is also available at :
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/moodss/
I'm sorry that there was a delay before someone could look at your
package. I unfortunately can't upload your package, sinc
On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 18:21 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > debian/README.Debian: contains information that's interesting, but not
> > really very important for people who install the package. I'd turn i
Hello Thibaut,
> I know the packages need more work (in particular concerning the
> copyright files, removing commented-out dh_*lines in rules and
> rebuilding under sid), so I am not requesting a detailed review, but I
> think advice on the following few questions would be timely:
That's always
Hello Mario,
On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 16:36 +0200, MarioDebian wrote:
> I have readed the mentors faq [1] and I have understand that the
> mentor is a student tutor who made a review of student's work along
> the summer.
>
> I suppose that the mentor have to make a dialog with google summer of
> cod
Bonjour Le Vert,
I'm not sure of your CC to ftpmaster, so I've removed that CC.
I'm looking for a sponsor to upload the new version of aircrack-ng. I
have already uploaded the 0.3 release but my sponsor has no time for me
for now...
I've taken a look and it looks like a very good package, goo
On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 15:13 +0200, Le_Vert wrote:
> > There's still an "aircrack" package in Debian, but you say it's dead
> > upstream. Did you persue any effort to have this newer version replace
> > the aircrack package or are there reasons to keep both in Debian?
> >
> > As said, looks good
Hello Piotr,
On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 23:29 +0200, Piotr Ozarowski wrote:
> I'm looking for a sponsor for advancecomp (ITP #367112).
> Package is lintian/linda clean and builds in pbuilder.
> dget http://debian.pox.one.pl/advancecomp_1.15-1.dsc
Unfortunately I can't upload your package, but I did t
Hello Zak,
> I'm looking for a sponsor for the `gnome-ppp' package. I got to ITA it
> around 10 days ago,[0] due to my touching it for Ubuntu, and I noticed
> that it needed a new developer to love it =)
> [1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnome-ppp/
Thanks for adopting the pack
On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 13:09 +0100, Adam James wrote:
> A minor quibble with your post, the following is from the Debian
> Developer's Reference [0]:
>
> Note the spaces prepending the line, which serves to break the lines
> correctly. To see an example of how this displays, see
> http://packages.d
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 21:48 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> IMHO we really should have a global NMU blacklist (no, never per-package.
> That way lies lameness) which we could ask the ctte to place maintainers in
> for a few months when someone does the NMU-and-forget routine and that NM
Hello Stefan,
> I am looking for a sponsor for revelation, since my current sponsor
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is too busy. This version would fix a lot of oben BTS
> bugs:
Unfortunately I can't upload your package for you, but I did review it
and here's some comments.
* In general the package looks
> James Pringle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > HI my name is james pringle i will be coming to ft lewis on june 15
> > i will be at the seattleaiport at 1415on the 15th and am in need of
> > sponor if u would have time for me that would be great thank u for
> > ur time
You are looking for a sp
Hello Sebastian,
> I'm looking for a sponsor for my collectd package. collectd is a small daemon
> that collects various system statistics and saves them to RRD files. Since it
> is written in C and stays in memory it is very fast and easy on the system.
> The statistics are very fine grained sinc
Hello Damyan,
> I am looking for a sponsor for flamerobin - а graphical database
> administration tool for Firebird DBMS. (ITP# 334489)
I can't sponsor you (yet), but I did review your package. Here's some
things I found.
* debian/control: Architecture is set to "i386 amd64". What prevents
the
On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 14:25 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 13:09 +0100, Adam James wrote:
> > A minor quibble with your post, the following is from the Debian
> > Developer's Reference [0]:
> >
> > Note the spaces prepending the line,
There's two points to this discussion:
1) The original issue I touched, which is whether the extended advice on
a space in front of the Homepage 'field' is necessary;
2) A spin-off discussion: do we need a homepage field at all or do
we need to provide it in another way.
As to the first poin
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 11:13 +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> It is the case (20-character-wide windows or less) with some terminals
> for blind people... In this case, one more character increase the cost
> of the terminal, so there are not many.
If the terminal is not more wide than 20 characters
On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 13:25 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I am in the same situation with some debian-med packages, and I ended up
> adding myself in Uploaders. I think that it is important that the users
> have a clue that there are real persons which take care of the packages.
Yes, and I would
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 22:31 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> * On the first upload, debian/changelog should have just one entry.
> This is somewhat clumsy if you have a history of this package in
> your private/local repository (like me with debs of kbtin on
> SourceForge), but I remember someon
On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 11:49 +0300, Jari Aalto+mail.linux wrote:
> The history in package indicates that there has been work going on
> before the package was added to Debian. The history documents the
> changes and gives indication of overall activity and competence the
> package was previously han
Hello Harald,
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/blockade.html shows that
> bug #346938 is set to "Fixed and Pending" :-{. This
> bug was fixed more that 6 months ago, so what is the
> BTS waiting for?
The upload that fixed the bug, 20041028-9, contained these fields:
| Maintainer: Marc 'HE' Brock
Hello Harri,
> Is there a changelog of the Debian policy online?
> Actually I would have expected a pointer on
> http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/, but maybe
> I am too blind to see.
That depends on what information you need. If you're refering to the
packaging of the policy, that URL's ha
On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 12:25 -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> It might be nice to distribute it as html and/or fix-up the reference in
> section 1.2 to point this file. Perhaps the checklist could be referenced
> as an appendix or the like so that the tag could be used, and then
> dwww could easily fi
On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 22:53 +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> Please don't feel offended. I tried to contact you several times and
> I hijacked this packaged because I couldn't do that.
In the future, an NMU might be a better start for improving a package
that lacks care, rather than hijac
Hello Simeon,
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 23:41 -0700, sim wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mp3togo".
I've taken a look at your package, and have the following comments, from
important to nitpicks:
* The package is a debian native package although it's not Debian
specific. That si
Hello Peter,
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tcpser".
I haven't fully checked your package out, but I noted that there's no
Intent To Package (ITP) bug filed for it. It's good practice to do that
beforehand, so you might aswell do that now, and list the bug number as
being closed in
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 05:54 +0100, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> For some reason mentors.debian.org won't take, here is the new location:
>
> http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~pcc03/tmp/debian/tcpser_1.0rc10-1.diff.gz
> http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~pcc03/tmp/debian/tcpser_1.0rc10-1.dsc
> http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk
Hello Tilman,
> I'm looking for a one-time sponsor for the gpsd package. My usual
> sponsor is not available at the moment, and the new upload would fix a
> serious bug.
>
> The changes to the previous revision consist of two lines only, not
> counting the changelog.
When I diff the package with
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 00:30 +0100, Martin Ellis wrote:
> I'm looking for someone to review the package as it stands, in order
> that any necessary changes for inclusion in Debian can be made
> before 0.12 is released.
Sure, no problem, here goes. In general the package looks good, good
work! I've
Hello Roland,
> can somebody check the 1.0.3-1 release of ldap-account-manager and
> upload it? My sponsor has hardware problems and will not be able to do
> the upload until next week.
> 1.0.3-1 closes a security related bug.
I've uploaded it.
One problem: I just realised that the urgency of th
On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 21:35 +0100, Michael Stevens wrote:
> #debian-mentors suggest this is unacceptably vague. Any suggested
> approaches to the upstream author? I've failed to get a response from
> him on other matters so far.
Contacting him is of course the best way to resolve the issue. I thin
ntrol. Hmmm. Ideas?
Actually, the .changes file does contain the short description:
---
Maintainer: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
squirrelmail - Webmail for nuts
---
Thijs
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 12:48 +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > > What's wrong with apt-get source?
> >
> > You have to add a line to /etc/apt/sources.list to make it work.
>
> Yes, but only once. It's still a useful alternative for anyone that
> checks out source packages from mentors.debian.net re
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 22:26 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
> > override file for the following file(s):
> >
> > muscle-doc_3.60-1_all.deb: package says section is doc, override says
> > science.
>
> I searched the policy, but
On Sun, 2006-08-13 at 23:25 -0500, Carlos C Soto wrote:
> Hello mentors!
> I was in a squashing party in Mexico DF, thank to Gunnar for all the
> help, damog, rodrigo and many others.
>
> I made a diff patch for bug 370144 mkvtoolnix.
> I want to make a NMU to corrent this bug. All the informati
On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 11:49 +0100, Colin Tuckley wrote:
> Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the work, but that bug has been release critical for just two
> > days now. Given the NMU policy, we can make uploads for RC bugs after 7
> > days. If it's still present
1 - 100 of 207 matches
Mail list logo
