ut the build process has changed. Also, libtool
is giving me trouble again... :-(
I'll investigate - feel free to file a FTBFS bug against the package.
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer
| \/¯| http://atterer.net
¯ '` ¯
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
t how on earth
to make it continue and create those Makefiles.
I think configure scripts which abort with an error are the reason why
some people develop such a strong dislike for autoconf.
HTH,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | CS student at the Technische | GPG key:
|
rences of "u_int" with "uint".
Personally, I wouldn't bother, and ignore the warnings.
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | CS student at the Technische | GPG key:
| \/¯| http://atterer.net | Universität München, Germany | 888354F7
¯ ´` ¯
rk fine. Is this the
correct way of doing it?
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | CS student at the Technische | GPG key:
| \/¯| http://atterer.net | Universität München, Germany | 888354F7
¯ ´` ¯
ould be fixed.
No, for GNU programs, "make clean" is not supposed to delete Makefiles
- but "make distclean" is. dpkg-buildpackage executes not "make
clean", but "debian/rules clean". Your clean rule in debian/rules
should then execute the "make dis
ly declared ~20 lines *after* this line. Try
moving/copying the "class BIstream;" before the definition of
"template class List".
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | CS student at the Technische | GnuPG key:
| \/¯| http://atterer.net | Universität München, Germany | 0x888354F7
¯ ´` ¯
bug today and see whether you can get #10! :-)
Cheers,
Richard (who just got #99725)
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | CS student at the Technische | GnuPG key:
| \/¯| http://atterer.net | Universität München, Germany | 0x888354F7
¯ ´` ¯
buildpackage. Then the user would only have to "make deb".
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | CS student at the Technische | GnuPG key:
| \/¯| http://atterer.net | Universität München, Germany | 0x888354F7
¯ ´` ¯
-stamp:
$(MAKE)
$(MAKE) -C subdir
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | CS student at the Technische | GnuPG key:
| \/¯| http://atterer.net | Universität München, Germany | 0x888354F7
¯ ´` ¯
mentions "DESTDIR" anywhere, use:
$(MAKE) install DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/package
$(MAKE) -C subdir install DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/package
BTW, it'd be cool if dh_make auto-detected the use of DESTDIR!
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer
Krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> sig! 330C4A75 2001-06-20 [self-signature]
> sig! 888354F7 2001-07-02 Richard Atterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
No problem, my key is on the key servers anyway! :-)
> but maybe someone can tell me what the subkey (D99FEE8D) is? that
have been using the -k
switch for dpkg-buildpackage for a long time with no problems:
alias dpkg-buildpackage='dpkg-buildpackage -k0x888354F7 -rfakeroot'
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | CS student at the Technische | GnuPG key:
| \/¯| http://atterer.
t how on earth
to make it continue and create those Makefiles.
I think configure scripts which abort with an error are the reason why
some people develop such a strong dislike for autoconf.
HTH,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | CS student at the Techn
rences of "u_int" with "uint".
Personally, I wouldn't bother, and ignore the warnings.
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | CS student at the Technische | GPG key:
| \/¯| http://atterer.net | Universität München, Germany | 888354F7
¯
rk fine. Is this the
correct way of doing it?
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | CS student at the Technische | GPG key:
| \/¯| http://atterer.net | Universität München, Germany | 888354F7
¯ ´` ¯
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ould be fixed.
No, for GNU programs, "make clean" is not supposed to delete Makefiles
- but "make distclean" is. dpkg-buildpackage executes not "make
clean", but "debian/rules clean". Your clean rule in debian/rules
should then execute the "make dis
declared ~20 lines *after* this line. Try
moving/copying the "class BIstream;" before the definition of
"template class List".
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | CS student at the Technische | GnuPG key:
| \/¯| http://atterer.net | Univ
bug today and see whether you can get #10! :-)
Cheers,
Richard (who just got #99725)
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | CS student at the Technische | GnuPG key:
| \/¯| http://atterer.net | Universität München, Germany | 0x888354F7
¯ ´` ¯
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
buildpackage. Then the user would only have to "make deb".
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | CS student at the Technische | GnuPG key:
| \/¯| http://atterer.net | Universität München, Germany | 0x888354F7
¯ ´` ¯
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
-stamp:
$(MAKE)
$(MAKE) -C subdir
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | CS student at the Technische | GnuPG key:
| \/¯| http://atterer.net | Universität München, Germany | 0x888354F7
¯ ´` ¯
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mentions "DESTDIR" anywhere, use:
$(MAKE) install DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/package
$(MAKE) -C subdir install DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/package
BTW, it'd be cool if dh_make auto-detected the use of DESTDIR!
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer
Krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> sig! 330C4A75 2001-06-20 [self-signature]
> sig! 888354F7 2001-07-02 Richard Atterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
No problem, my key is on the key servers anyway! :-)
> but maybe someone can tell me what the subkey (D99FEE8D) is? that
have been using the -k
switch for dpkg-buildpackage for a long time with no problems:
alias dpkg-buildpackage='dpkg-buildpackage -k0x888354F7 -rfakeroot'
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | CS student at the Technische | GnuPG key:
| \/¯| http://atterer.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 09:27:19AM -0700, Dan Souza wrote:
> Sorry, I dont know if this is the right group, but here goes anyway.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] would have been correct.
> I have a text file containing a document (eg this posting) which is
> formatted as such. I need to import this into a da
root (why?), then maybe
using "fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage" instead of "dpkg-buildpackage
-rfakeroot" will help. (I haven't tested it, though.)
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | CS student at the Technische | GnuPG key:
| \/¯| http://a
icense also allows authors to restrict
the right of making modifications to parts of the documentation. Is
that non-free, too???
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | CS student at the Technische | GnuPG key:
| \/¯| http://atterer.net | Universität München, Germany | 0x888354F7
¯ ´` ¯
PGP signature
.de/atterer/debian unstable jigdo
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | CS student at the Technische | GnuPG key:
| \/¯| http://atterer.net | Universität München, Germany | 0x888354F7
¯ ´` ¯
PGP signature
age once and then forget
| about it.
Of course, this might not be necessary if you trust in your
sponsoree's "package management" ability.
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | CS student at the Technische | GnuPG key:
| \/¯| http://atterer.net | Unive
something else I should do?
I think it's best if you contact upstream and tell them that "make
distclean" should not delete the file, only "make maintainer-clean"
should.
For the moment though, I'd change the Makefile not to delete the
.tab.c file.
Cheers,
Richard
-
lease, all arches should
be supported.
Logs can be found at <http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=w3c-libwww>
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer
| \/¯| http://atterer.net
¯ '` ¯
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 11:58:39PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
> I just uploaded a new version of libwww 5.4.0 to fix #151894 and the
> build failed on sparc and ia64 with really bizarre symptoms.
I now found out that the build fails on ReiserFS, but succeeds on
ext2! What could be c
a problem within GNU make... :-(
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | CS student at the Technische | GnuPG key:
| \/¯| http://atterer.net | Universität München, Germany | 0x888354F7
¯ '` ¯
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 09:27:19AM -0700, Dan Souza wrote:
> Sorry, I dont know if this is the right group, but here goes anyway.
debian-user@lists.debian.org would have been correct.
> I have a text file containing a document (eg this posting) which is
> formatted as such. I need to import this
root (why?), then maybe
using "fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage" instead of "dpkg-buildpackage
-rfakeroot" will help. (I haven't tested it, though.)
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | CS student at the Technische | GnuPG key:
| \/¯| http://atterer.ne
icense also allows authors to restrict
the right of making modifications to parts of the documentation. Is
that non-free, too???
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | CS student at the Technische | GnuPG key:
| \/¯| http://atterer.net | Universität München, Germany |
.de/atterer/debian unstable jigdo
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | CS student at the Technische | GnuPG key:
| \/¯| http://atterer.net | Universität München, Germany | 0x888354F7
¯ ´` ¯
pgpX0pfyjPYlY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
age once and then forget
| about it.
Of course, this might not be necessary if you trust in your
sponsoree's "package management" ability.
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | CS student at the Technische | GnuPG key:
| \/¯| http://atterer.net | Universität München, Germany | 0x888354F7
¯ ´` ¯
something else I should do?
I think it's best if you contact upstream and tell them that "make
distclean" should not delete the file, only "make maintainer-clean"
should.
For the moment though, I'd change the Makefile not to delete the
.tab.c file.
Cheers,
Richard
-
lease, all arches should
be supported.
Logs can be found at <http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=w3c-libwww>
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer
| \/¯| http://atterer.net
¯ '` ¯
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 11:58:39PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
> I just uploaded a new version of libwww 5.4.0 to fix #151894 and the
> build failed on sparc and ia64 with really bizarre symptoms.
I now found out that the build fails on ReiserFS, but succeeds on
ext2! What could be causin
a problem within GNU make... :-(
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | CS student at the Technische | GnuPG key:
| \/¯| http://atterer.net | Universität München, Germany | 0x888354F7
¯ '` ¯
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
41 matches
Mail list logo