alse moves :)
Going to back up fstab while I wait for a
response...
thank you in advance,
Matthew G. Leeds
alse moves :)
Going to back up fstab while I wait for a
response...
thank you in advance,
Matthew G. Leeds
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:02:02PM +0100, José Sánchez Moreno wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnomecatalog".
>
> * Package name: gnomecatalog
> Version : 0.3.1-1.0
That '.0' at the end isn't necessary.
> Upstream Author : [fill in name and e
Hi,
There is a package in the Ubuntu distro called gfceu which is a gnome front
end for the NES emulator fceu.
How did I get a Ubuntu package into the Debian distro? I am not a Debian
developer, so I can not upload packages directly into the Debian archive.
-Matt
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 10:09:13AM +0100, Roland Gruber wrote:
> The problem is that my application provides a set of default templates
> for user creation. These files must be editable via the application
> itself and therefore reside in /var/ldap-account-manager.
I most sincerely hope they do no
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 12:02:02PM +0100, Roland Gruber wrote:
> Matthew Palmer schrieb:
> > Well, don't do that, then. Ship the template files somewhere else, and then
> > copy them into /var if they're not already there.
>
> that is probably the best solution. I
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 11:56:44AM +0200, Sylvain Garcia wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "obm".
>
> * Package name: obm
> Version : 2.1.9-1
> Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
e uploaded this package for me.
Cheers!
Kind regards
Matthew Wakeling
--
Here we go - the Fairy Godmother redundancy proof.
-- Computer Science Lecturer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:20:40PM -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> I'm new to this end - and don't know if what I want is possible or not.
> But here goes.
What you want is quite possible, and something a lot of people do a lot.
> I need to modify some of the stock Debian packages for different
> o
rst from scratch Debian package. Anything I could improve?
>
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me if it is good enough.
>
If you can check the md5sum package above I'll happily look it over and
sponsor.
Matt
--
Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
n/changelog targets "UNRELEASED" at the moment. If you would
like me to upload it, please change this to "unstable".
Secondly, you have:
Package: libcommons-vfs-java
Section: devel
Please change this to Section: libs.
Other than that, it is in good shape and I will be hap
doc.
Other than that looks good.
Matt
--
Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ould be
> generated), or? (I am sorry. I had forgotten about them)
You could strip them out with the jar. Since you are repacking the
tarball anyway, that's worth doing.
If you are installing them (which seems a good idea?) then you certainly
need to build them from source, but the late
On Mon Jul 21 00:57, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> I've just uploaded a new version to mentors.debian.net, you should dget that.
>
Looks good, I've uploaded
Matt
--
Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 02:08:34PM +0200, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
> How to set clean Etch build environment, so I can backport a package from
> testing to etch?
pbuilder, just like you would setup a lenny or sid build environment.
- Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
Hi, sorry I've been silent for a while, I've been a bit busy.
Everything looks good now, and I'd be happy to upload, _but_:
you now have:
Suggests: nanoxml2-java-doc
whereas you actually want:
Suggests: libnanoxml2-java-doc
Matt
--
Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Descr
of them as alternatives (those that are
packaged).
- debian/copyright claims BSD licence, but the LICENSE in the tarball
says GPLv2, which is it?
Both packages build and are lintian/pbuilder clean though, which is
good.
Matt
0. http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/
--
Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
verything else is fine, I'll upload it once you move the Closes: up to
the most recent entry
Matt
--
Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ll the needed java machinery so you
>don't have to depend on a java runtime environment; is that correct?
Java library packages don't depend on JREs, Java applications that use
them.
Matt
--
Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 04:08:08AM +0200, Noel David Torres Taño wrote:
> Hello mentors:
>
> I have some files in the package I'm maintaining which are (most probably)
> under GPLv1. And it is NOT in /usr/share/common-licenses
>
> What must I do? To install the GPL-1 file there or to express the
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 10:43:00PM +0200, Jann Horn wrote:
> Er... I haven't got a file named "*.orig.tar.gz". I think it's because I
> myself made the program I want to put in a package.
> So my question is: How can I remove this dash?
You don't want to remove the dash, you want to fix your packa
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 01:45:10AM +0200, Laurent Léonard wrote:
> I try to build the package kio-ftps, but the 0.2 version (for KDE 4) uses
> CMake. What is the procedure to build a Debian package with CMake ?
It's no different to any other package. You put cmake in the build-deps,
run it to bu
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 11:21:19PM +0200, lucas kenter wrote:
> I would like to create a debian package for a simple project that I've
> created. The project contains only scripts, so there is no makefile or
> anything like that. For the script to work I would like to prompt for some
> simple quest
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 12:10:26AM +0200, lucas kenter wrote:
> Wow,
>
> Thanks for the quick and helpfull response Matthew and ehm... I suppose this
> is what they mean by "Debians helpfull community"! I'm possitively amazed!
> :-D
>
> one more question thoug
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:14:56PM +0100, Laurent Guignard wrote:
> Michal ??iha?? a écrit :
> > Hi
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Quick look at the package:
> >
> > - any reason why it is Architecture: i386?
>
>
> In reason of the libraries dependency.
> libnet1 package is for i386 architecture and dh
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 01:37:48PM +0100, Laurent Guignard wrote:
> I have another question about architecture :
> How is it possible to check if a package could be built on architecture
> without the appropriate hardware ?
> I can say that dhcp-probe could be build on i386 and any compatible
> arc
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 03:04:33PM +0100, Alexander Block wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hexec".
>
> Package name: hexec
> Version : 0.2.0-1
> Upstream Author : Alexander Block <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 09:11:36PM +0100, Laurent Guignard wrote:
> Is there any means to know if someone work on a bug from RC bug ?
> rc-alert or popbugs show all RC bugs of our packages but if someone is
> already on, it isn't necessary to work to solve the bug.
> Are all works in progress refer
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 04:14:06PM -0800, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > A new version of the package is available which integrates all updates
> > you noticed.
> > I controlled all files twice but an error or anything else could be
> > hidden in.
> >
> > You will find all links need t
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 04:06:46PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 22:18:01 +0900
> "Paul Wise" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Andy Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > New symbols. It specifically has support for embedding images int
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 01:05:25PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> http://www.dclunie.com/medical-image-faq/html/part8.html#UIDRegistration
>
> ...
> To use SNMP one needs an Enterpise UID assigned by IANA, which is free
> and may also be used for any other purpose that requires a UID root.
>
>
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 01:32:34PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> So IMHO only large institution would need to change that to their own
> OID, unfortunately this is a compile time variable...
Fix that. Making something that has to be unique to each installation a
compile-time flag is stupendou
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 07:44:27PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> To begin, I think there's some confusion about UID and OID. They
> are actually the same thing, according to Clunie:
>
> What DICOM calls "UIDs" are referred to in the
> ISO OSI world as Object Identifiers (OIDs).
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 05:45:44PM +0100, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fspy".
>
> * Package name: fspy
> Version : 0.1.0-1
> Upstream Author : Richard Sammet
> * URL : http://mytty.org/fspy/
> * License : GPL
> Program
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 09:54:30AM +0100, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> Matthew Palmer ha scritto:
>
> > Looks good, except that the manpage mentions info pages which don't appear
> > to exist in the package or upstream tarball.
>
> Fixed.
Looks good. Uploaded.
I've made several updates to the debian-mentors FAQ in the last few days,
including making mention of sponsors.debian.net, pointing to some revision
control howtos, a comprehensive description of native vs non-native
packages, and a pointer to the REJECT-FAQ (with a list of things to check
for in p
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 01:33:55PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> George Danchev wrote:
> > On Friday 09 September 2005 15:01, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > --cut--
> > > The FAQ is at: http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html
> >
> > a minor typo
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 01:13:19PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 06:30:29PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 12:16 +0200, Joost van Baal wrote:
> >
> > > On http://www.debian.org/ there is a link called "Help Debian", to
> > > http://www.debian.org/devel/jo
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 06:03:10PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Thaddeus H. Black in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Pierre Machard wrote:
> > > Do not worry if I set my name as uploader, so that it's easy for me to
> > > track packages I am sponsoring.
>
> The PTS does perfectly suit this, and you
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 01:40:03AM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Matthew Palmer in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > The primary reason I've seen expressed for desire to be added to the
> > Uploaders field is so that the sponsor can get a quick summary of a
> > sp
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 05:00:01PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 09:48:26PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > You can remove the transition package now; upgrades skipping a stable
> > release are not supported.
>
> Interesting, is this policy or just common practice in
Hi HTere~!
I am in Dhaka for a week, and have organised a key signing party with
the local Bangladesh Linux Users Group (BDLUG) Hopefully we will end up
with 1 or 2 maintainers from there!
Regards,
Matthew Grant
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
en arms. It is good
to see another corner of the map soon to have a red dot on it!
Cheers,
Matthew Grant
--
Matthew Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Matthew's UNIX Box
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 04:53:50PM -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> What's puzzling me is this:
>
>-- the original source tarball used to be acovea-4.0.0.tar.gz,
> and I used the name acovea_4.0.0.orig.tar.gz, as is proper.
Check.
>-- upstream has changed the name of the source tarball so
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 11:26:43AM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Dear all!
>
> I have a question concerning packages with epoch: We are preparing a NMU
> (maintainer approved) for tipa which currently is of version
> 2:1.2-2
> When I get the source package via apt-get source tipa and rebu
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 09:10:14PM -0500, Joe Smith wrote:
>
> "Justin Pryzby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Indeed, many packages aren't copyrighted by individual person[s];
> >check out the 'coreutils' package, the copyright of which is held by
> >some funky g
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 12:13:31PM +1100, skaller wrote:
> This is how Wikipedia works and why it is successful. With minimal
> fuss I have contributed some comments and a couple of changes.
How easy is it for a Wikipedia comment to contain a rootkit, though?
- Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 02:14:14PM +1100, skaller wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 20:44 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
>
> > > EG: My comp is on the net sometimes and sitting here idle.
> > > I'd be happy if Debian used it occasionally to build binaries.
> > > Where is the web page telling me how to a
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 08:04:01PM +0200, Mugurel Tudor wrote:
> - the repository created is a trivial one (something like "deb
> http://server/dir1/dir2 dir3/"), and dir3 containes the packages
> involved and the Packages.gz (created with dpkg-scanpackages)
Hint: use apt-ftparchive. It's a lot t
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 05:17:48PM +0100, Marcus Better wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I use a few packages, such as kernel-patch-exec-shield, which are
> neglected by the maintainer. What can I do to help if the maintainer is
> not responding to bug reports or e-mail
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 04:40:12PM +0200, Ivars Strazdins wrote:
> Sam Morris wrote:
> > it should really live in /usr/lib/. If the use of /opt
> > is hard coded into the package then, well, that sucks. :)
>
> It is hard coded into management decision to which I really have no
> access whatsoever
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 09:01:18PM +0100, Marco Nenciarini wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 02:25:29PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:21:42PM +0100, Marco Nenciarini wrote:
> > > Package: wnpp
> > > Severity: wishlist
> > > Owner: Marco Nenciarini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 10:12:46AM +0100, Marco Nenciarini wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 09:21:08AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> >
> > If there's one thing people are good at here in d-mentors, it's editing long
> > descriptions to improve them.
> >
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 08:19:23PM +0100, Julien Valroff wrote:
> I am very interested in taking over fast-user-switch-applet package
> (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=304763)
>
> I don't own the ITP which is almost one year old, and the owner hasn't
> (yet) answered my e-mail.
>
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 02:31:54PM -0400, Kevin Coyner wrote:
> Now I'd like to make it depend on either php4 or php5, so I've
> attempted the following:
>
> Depends: ${misc:Depends}, php4 (>=4.3) | php5 (>=5.1) |
> libapache2-mod-php4 | libapache2-mod-php5, php4-mysql (>=4 .3) |
I think you're o
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 03:18:23PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> W: winefish; A binary links against a library it does not use symbols from
> This package contains a binary that links against a library that is
> not in the Depends line. This may also be a bug in the library which
> does not hav
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 01:58:08PM -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> Of course, both php4 and php5 are still out there and probably both
> are widely used at this point. There's two ways I can think of to go about
> rolling .deb's for each:
>
> - change "--with-php-config" in my
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 02:52:43PM +0300, Panu Kalliokoski wrote:
> Some issues seem to come up time and again when somebody inspects RFS'd
> packages. Some of these are not breaches of policy but simply bad
> practices, like leaving quoted dh_* commands in debian/rules. Some are
> breaches of po
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 01:46:35PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I am working on packaging probcons, which consists of two main programs
> carrying the core functionalities, and a few other programs with
> ambiguous names (convert, makegunplut, project) which will not be useful
> to the vast major
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 06:14:39PM -0500, Carlo Segre wrote:
> We are working on package of a data acquisition & control system (called
> "mx") which has an executable called "motor" which has a completely
> different function (it is a java editor). This executable conflicts with
> an executabl
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 08:42:39PM -0500, Carlo Segre wrote:
> >Is motor generally useful, or is it just used as an internal component of
> >mx? (not a good name itself, BTW) If the latter, consider putting motor
> >into /usr/lib/mx.
>
> It is a generally used program for data acquisition and con
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 12:02:24PM +1000, Nikolai Lusan wrote:
> Once I install the libpq4-hw package dpkg will still complain:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] # dpkg -i postgresql-client-8.0-hw_8.0.7-1_i386.deb
> Selecting previously deselected package postgresql-client-8.0-hw.
> (Reading database ... 221
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 12:32:53PM +1000, Nikolai Lusan wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 12:15 +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > I strongly suspect that You're Stuffed. For this sort of thing, I typically
> > just create my own packages with the same name and cross my fingers tha
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 09:03:18PM -0700, Steven Hill wrote:
> I have been reading the literature on debian packages, and I am trying
> to figure out how to tell the package installer to automatically use
> "apt-get install" to satisfy a dependency at installation time - is
> there any way to do th
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 10:46:47AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> Matthew, could we please add this to the FAQ?
It shall be done. I'll also note about dget (which is a little-known tool,
I think).
- Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 07:49:01PM +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 18:59 +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > Dear package maintainers...
> >
> > a sponsor of Debian packages today sent an email to the mentors.debian.net
> > support email address and I would like to forward the sug
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 07:57:27PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Now lintian complains about the files in /usr/lib/kde3:
>
> E: kdesvn-kio-plugins: shlib-with-non-pic-code usr/lib/kde3/kded_kdesvnd.so
> E: kdesvn-kio-plugins: shlib-with-non-pic-code usr/lib/kde3/kio_ksvn.so
> E: kdesvn: shlib-with
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 10:37:06PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> If forgot to add, that the software runs just fine on my i386 box. Is
> this a error message that can safely be ignored or does it only affect
> certain !i386 platforms.
It's only a problem on some !i386 platforms.
- Matt
--
To U
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 01:16:40AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 07:57:27PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> Now lintian complains about the files in /usr/lib/kde3:
> >>
> >> E: kdesvn-kio-plugins:
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please don't hijack threads. If you wish to start a new thread, click 'new
message' rather than replying to an existing message and changing the
subject.
- Matt
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 05:26:53PM -0500, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 08:27:43PM +0200, kku wrote:
> > >You are programaticaly managing a configuration file in /etc. You
> > >should look into using ucf, that already handles this.
> >
> > I've had a look at ucf, but
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 10:18:29PM -0500, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 10:01:47AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 05:26:53PM -0500, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 08:27:43PM +0200, kku wro
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 05:16:06PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
> On (16/09/06 21:34), Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> > On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, James Westby wrote:
> > > * The debian/copyright file is lacking. There is no copyright
> > > information, what is referred to as Copyright is in fact a Li
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 11:33:43PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > How does pag compare to pwgen (http://sourceforge.net/projects/pwgen/)?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > tony
>
> Hi Tony,
>
> yes, i tested pwgen in thought the same. Pwgen has no option to create a
> password list and you cant set the l
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 11:01:57PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> I'm looking for a program like 'what' on BSD, but on Linux (obviously).
This is more a question for debian-user. But I'll say that a bit of shell
plumbing would probably get you what you want:
strings $file | grep '^\$.*\$$'
Of cou
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 03:19:27AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You cant generate passwords with only numbers in it with pwgen.
Sounds like a chance for a feature enhancement you could make.
> But maybe pwgen is better i dont know. My program cant generate
> PWs with only letters at time.
>
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 02:44:14PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> For one of the packages I created, the upstream sources I used were a
> version 1.x accidentally released as version 2.0 on sourceforge.
"Accidentally"? Did you package and upload this new upstream release? Has
upstream gone back
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 05:09:51PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 04:28:14PM +1000, Matthew Palmer a écrit :
> > On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 02:44:14PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > > For one of the packages I created, the upstream sources I used were a
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 09:33:46AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 08:20:15PM -0300, Leo Antunes a écrit :
> > If that's done then you're job's simple, repackage with the new version
> > and that's it. Make it as fast as possible though, since your users are
> > probably a bi
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 07:36:36PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 12:19:04PM +0200, Bas Wijnen a écrit :
> > But that's not what he wants, because then all the people who upgrade to
> > etch
> > with also see it then, even though it's irrelevant for them. What he's
> > as
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 07:19:04AM +1000, Andree Leidenfrost wrote:
> The '(if any)' makes me think I can amend the copyright file like this:
>
> It was originally downloaded from
> http://home1.stofanet.dk/peter-seidler/ which does not exist anymore.
> There is currently no known download locatio
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 11:56:59PM +0100, Székelyi Szabolcs wrote:
> I've posted an [0]RFS about 2 weeks ago, but the package has received no
> attention from official developers.
>
> What is the usual procedure in this case? Wait longer, re-post the RFS
> or try to accept that the package will ne
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 11:44:55PM -0800, Charlie Zender wrote:
> 2. dh_builddeb warnings with gpg signing
Try passing '-uc -us' to dpkg-buildpackage -- that should tell it to not try
and sign the resulting package upload.
- Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 02:15:35PM +0100, Salokine wrote:
> I learn to create my first new package (tremulous-mappack). I've finished to
> create it and download to ftp//mentors.debian.net.
>
> What must I do now to continue integration process ?
> Why my package isn't to "My Packages" view ?
> W
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 10:32:21PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 02:24:13PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> >
> > Because the vast bulk of users do *not* roll their own kernels [yes, an
> > assumption, but I'm pretty confident here :)].
> >
> I disagree. I think that
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 09:15:28AM +1100, Tim Hessint wrote:
> So, there is no .dsc or orig.tar.gz.
There needs to be a source package in a Debian upload. A source package
consists of a .dsc plus the files it references. Until you have a source
package, there's no way your package can be uploade
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 07:21:51AM +0100, Johann Rudloff wrote:
> I hope it's correct now, but I've one little question:
>
> > * your build-depends are wrong. you depend on libgtk2.0-0 instead of
> > libgtk2.0-dev and libglib2.0-dev
> I added both, but is the dependency on libglib2.0-dev rea
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 06:42:13PM +0100, Chris Amthor wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "crotch".
>
> * Package name: crotch
> Version : 1.0.1-1
> Upstream Author : Chris Amthor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.chroam.de/
> *
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 07:26:00PM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
>
> Suppose this:
>
> bzr branch devel.branch my.branch
>
> C-c
This is a question for the bzr lists, not debian-mentors.
- Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 10:22:41PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> I do have an issue I need help testing before upload. If I install
> etch/sid liferea + liferea-gtkhtml in a chroot, then add a sources
> line for my private repository with this new version, apt-get update,
> apt-get dis
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 01:33:54PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:37:28PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 10:22:41PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > > What happens is that liferea is held-back. I've
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:39:28PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> [Note: I updated the package to backport a patch from 1.2.5, which
> both a reporter and upstream agree should close #379900. Please, if you
> deem the package uploadable, do grab the new version first, from the
> same UR
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 09:44:45PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 01:43:52PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:39:28PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
>
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# apt-get dist-upgrad
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 11:29:36PM +0100, Curt Manucredo wrote:
> i am not quiet sure about sudo, since it asks from time to time a
> password.
Then you haven't put NOPASSWD: in the relevant sudoers entry. It works like
a charm.
Oh, and I think that you've totally over-complicated the wheel in y
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 08:22:30PM -0800, FROM FILA wrote:
> {libglade) i been tying to install for the last month and it's killing me, i
> get a message that says not installable so i go to problems and that say
> Aplication package is incompatible with current software but i have the
> lastest??
ponsor. Of course, I am happy for people to volunteer
to sponsor these in as well.
Thanks,
Matt
- --
Matthew Johnson
http://www.matthew.ath.cx/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76
iD8DBQFF5CJUpldmHVvob7kRAgaaAJ9NpVevhgpvwZFzLT+gE1vbFP
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:17:10AM +0100, Curt Manucredo wrote:
> i could never imagine that it is possible to call a command and then
> have root rights for it, without authentificating on the system with a
> password. so i thought a daemon running as root might solve that problem
> (which i thoug
for me.
Thanks,
Matt
--
Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 05:14:50PM +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le mercredi 14 mars 2007 16:27, Matthew Johnson a écrit :
> > Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package otpw.
>
> Few remarks concerning your package:
Thanks (-:
> * libotpw-dev: Is it mandatory
uire licence information to be added to every
file? As an upstream I would consider that unreasonable when I have
clearly given the licence elsewhere. If not, what would be sufficient?
Must all upstreams be asked whether their stated copyright on the work
is correct file-by-file?
Also, thanks for the manpages tip.
Matt
--
Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
1 - 100 of 885 matches
Mail list logo
