RFS: replaceit (#490695)

d would consider sponsoring me though the new maintainers process. -- Jonathan Wiltshire signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: replaceit (#490695)

applying. If this is incorrect should I apply for maintainers status and get into the system first before sending an RFS? Thanks -- Jonathan Wiltshire signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: replaceit (#490695)

ient, Applicants should have already contributed significantly to Debian. This can be done through packaging, documentation, Quality Assurance, ..." which implies to me that I should already have worked on a few packages and had them sponsored before applying. If I've just got in a muddle do please correct me :-) I really appreciate your help, sorry if these are really newbie questions. Cheers -- Jonathan Wiltshire signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: replaceit (#490695)

On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 10:59:00PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Perhaps I have just confused myself, but > http://www.debian.org/devel/join/nm-checklist says this: > > "For the NM process to be the most efficient, Applicants should have > already contributed significa

Re: RFS: replaceit (#490695)

; for NMU's, so you want a non-NMU version like A.B.C-X or replaceit_1.0.0-2. It's now correct (I think) and available at http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/replaceit/replaceit_1.0.0-2.dsc. I think I worked out what happened: I don't have the correct email in DEBEMAIL so

Re: RFS: replaceit (#490695)

y me. I agree, the warning is useful in the right context, but not in this case. I've never reached this stage, obviously - what happens to the package now that it's in the new queue? I notice also that it doesn't have my ITP bug number listed under 'Closes', is that somethi

Re: RFS: replaceit (#490695)

> No, that's fine. I'll close it when it goes in (presumably I'll get a mail when it does?) I have another package that's almost ready for feedback. Woud you prefer to see it or should I advertise an RFS? Not sure what the protocol is here. Cheers -- Jonathan Wiltshire signature.asc Description: Digital signature

RFS: adtool -- a command-line utility for Active Directory administration

e aware of them. If this is incorrect please tell me and I will correct them first. Thanks for taking the time to have a look. It is not a huge package so I hope it won't take too long to check over. -- Jonathan Wiltshire signature.asc Description: Digital signature

RFS: copher

ry: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/copher/copher_0.1.2-1.dsc Thank you for taking the time to consider sponsoring me. -- Jonathan Wiltshire signature.asc Description: Digital signature

RFS: gxemul -- machine emulator for multiple architectures

ation The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gxemul - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gxemul/gxemul_0.4.6.5-1.dsc Thanks. -- Jon

Re: RFS: gxemul -- machine emulator for multiple architectures

manpower backup and redundancy, as well as additional skills and > expertise. Point taken. There are one or two others on the list that I have an interest in, but that's about it. As you say, I don't want to overdo it. Cheers -- Jonathan Wiltshire signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: gxemul -- machine emulator for multiple architectures

27;s an artifact of upstream's build process. -- Jonathan Wiltshire signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: copher

E copher*changes > W: copher: extra-license-file usr/share/doc/copher/COPYING.gz > I: copher: package-contains-empty-directory usr/sbin/ Gone. The updated package can be found at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/copher Thanks for your time and feedbacki. -- Jonathan Wiltshire signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: copher

On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 06:08:14PM +0100, Daniel Watkins wrote: > http://sf.net is expanded to the full SF URL by tools that use watch > files and, I presume, will be updated if SF ever changes its URL schema. Ah, that makes more sense, thanks. -- Jonathan Wiltshire signatu

Re: RFS: wallpaper-tray (updated package)

since the previous package never went into the > repository. See below for more details. It's good practice to increment your versions for each mentors upload too, so that mentors can easily tell the new version of your package even if it didn't go into the main repository. - --

RFS: new upstream of gxemul 0.4.4.6-1

dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gxemul/gxemul_0.4.6.6-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Thanks - -- Jonathan Wiltshire -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkkgXVIACgkQymvqPtuAC1It5ACfef2KU6BoanzBNs

RFS: copher (2nd try)

opher - - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/copher/copher_0.1.2-3.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. - -- Jonathan Wiltshire -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: G

Re: RFS: copher (2nd try)

e end of this bug. Thanks for you feedback. The updated package is at http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/copher/copher_0.1.2-4.dsc if you'd like to have another check. Cheers -- Jonathan Wiltshire signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: copher (2nd try)

Uploaded an updated package to http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/copher/copher_0.1.2-4.dsc Thanks in advance for your feedback. -- Jonathan Wiltshire signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: new upstream of gxemul 0.4.4.6-1

ls to the patch and unpatch targets, and it builds now including the patch. If you could take a look and consider sponsoring, the updated dsc is at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gxemul/gxemul_0.4.6.6-2.dsc Thanks! -- Jonathan Wiltshire signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug reports in Ubuntu

eract with Ubuntu's at all or leave them to it? What's the protocol in this situation? Thanks -- Jonathan Wiltshire signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: new upstream of gxemul 0.4.4.6-1

utorial for converting an existing debian/rules with patches (though Sandro's helped a lot). If there isn't one already I will try to find time to write one. >Now, the package looks well done to me. Thanks. I'm aware that checkins upstream are quite frequent so I'll keep an ey

Re: Bug reports in Ubuntu

p; sid. Can you advise further or point me to somewhere to find out more? I've never used testing-proposed-updates, but it would be a good thing to learn about. Cheers -- Jonathan Wiltshire signature.asc Description: Digital signature

RFS: gxemul segfault bugfix

;t know if that causes any problems with uploading this fix. Thank you in advance. -- Jonathan Wiltshire signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Bug reports in Ubuntu

//www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities -- Jonathan Wiltshire signature.asc Description: Digital signature

RFS: webcpp (adoption, bugfix and standards/dh7)

eally solid packages. Thanks in advance. -- Jonathan Wiltshire signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: webcpp (adoption, bugfix and standards/dh7)

by 3.8.0, to explain that you're using > a patch system. Ok, written and included. The dsc is at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/webcpp/webcpp_0.8.4-7.dsc Thanks for your comments. -- Jonathan Wiltshire signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: webcpp (adoption, bugfix and standards/dh7)

ached. Combined changelog entries and updated the timestamp. Uploaded to http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/webcpp/webcpp_0.8.4-6.dsc, if you have chance to take a look. Cheers -- Jonathan Wiltshire --- rules~ 2008-11-26 20:21:13.0 + +++ rules 2008-11-26 19:40:18.0 + @@ -3

Re: RFS: webcpp (adoption, bugfix and standards/dh7)

rom the beginning. It's fine, I'd rather take the time and learn much more this way than just pushing it straight to archive and not doing. Cheers Jonathan -- Jonathan Wiltshire signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: webcpp (adoption, bugfix and standards/dh7)

ets removed in the clean target - does that sound right? -- Jonathan Wiltshire signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: webcpp (adoption, bugfix and standards/dh7)

ro Tosi (aka morph, Morpheus, matrixhasu) > My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ > Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

Re: RFS: webcpp (adoption, bugfix and standards/dh7)

could take a look? (there's no hurry) Change: move the rm command to clean instead of configure. dsc: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/webcpp/webcpp_0.8.4-7.dsc Cheers Jonathan -- Jonathan Wiltshire signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: gxemul segfault bugfix

ect and the bug has been closed. -- Jonathan Wiltshire signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: copher (2nd try)

og or one entry per attempt? The dsc is at http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/copher/copher_0.1.2+20081201.dsc, if there are other points to fix just let me know. Cheers Jonathan > > -- > bye, > pabs > -- Jonathan Wiltshire signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: copher (2nd try)

t all rather than > any. Fixed. Uploaded to http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/copher/copher_0.1.2+20081201-1.dsc if you have a chance to look. Cheers Jonathan > > -- > bye, > pabs > -- Jonathan Wiltshire signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: copher (2nd try)

ail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jonathan Wiltshire signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: copher (2nd try)

On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 07:06:54PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: > Package uploaded. > > Please mail this list for future uploads and I will upload if I can. Excellent, cheers :-) Jonathan -- Jonathan Wiltshire signature.asc Description: Digital signature

RFS: whohas

I would appreciate a review. Thanks in advance -- Jonathan Wiltshire signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: whohas

ribed them nicely. > Will upload once these issues are fixed. Uploaded to http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/whohas/whohas_0.21-2.dsc Cheers -- Jonathan Wiltshire signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: whohas

am tarball unless it has been repacked due to DFSG/other > issues. I used the upstream tarball instead of the one you uploaded to > mentors. Odd, I haven't intentionally touched it. I'll diff them but could it be cruft from git-buildpackage? -- Jonathan Wiltshire signature.asc Description: Digital signature

RFS: replaceit

would be appreciated. The dsc file can be found at http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/replaceit/replaceit_1.0.0-4.dsc Thanks in advance, -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 Sending of encrypted mail is encouraged signatur

Re: RFS: replaceit

#x27;m not inclined to hurry :-) [1] http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ch-modify.en.html > as could be seen at http://patch-tracking.debian.net/package/replaceit > /* that is an extremely great resource ! */ That is very helpful - wish I'd know about that before. Thanks for your spons

RFS: webcpp

you're unable to sponsor I would still appreciate a review. Thanks in advance -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 Sending of encrypted mail is encouraged signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Uploads to experimental instead of unstable (was RFS: vbetool (QA upload))

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:08:32AM +, Neil Williams wrote: > > Unstable has had to be all-but-closed as a technical step to solve a > social problem. Uploads should not be targeted at unstable simply I was not aware of this, where can I find more info about it? -- Jonathan Wilts

Re: Someone to 'proofread' a .deb please

evel/wnpp/#l1 Note: the template is just that - you need to flesh it out a lot. Your RFS is an advert to prospective sponsors, so you should try to capture their interest. -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 Sending of encrypted

Re: RFS: webcpp

Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer > www.debian.org - get.debian.net > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB80

Re: RFS: webcpp

don't know if it should qualify as an RC bug. -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 Sending of encrypted mail is encouraged signature.asc Description: Digital signature

RFS: backintime (new)

n if you can't upload I'd appreciate any review. Thanks in advance -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 Sending of encrypted mail is encouraged signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: flactag

load. For now I would increment, you can always squash them down later if your sponsor prefers it. [1] http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/intrepid/man1/dh.html [2] man uscan [3] dch -i -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 Sending of encrypted mail is encouraged signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: flactag

On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 03:26:10PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Your main binary doesn't have a man page. I meant to remove that line, sorry. It does. -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 Sending of encrypted mail is en

Re: RFS: flactag

ation. > I'm about to upload a new version with the version number incremented. I'll > send another RFS for that. You probably don't need to bother with a whole RFS, just reply to the list with the location of your uploaded files. It keeps the discussion threaded so potentia

Re: RFS: ganttpv

eally_ _really_ shouldn't be installing files like 'debian mentor login and password' and 'good build ready to go'. Have a look at fixing these and upload again to mentors. -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 Sending of encrypted mail is encouraged signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: gxemul segfault bugfix

inters given by > Pabs should help, otherwise please ask for help ;-) Release have approved the debdiff and asked for the upload; it's on mentors at [1] if you have a chance. Cheers :-) [1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gxemul/gxemul_0.4.6.3-1+lenny1.dsc -- Jonathan Wilt

Re: RFS: gxemul segfault bugfix

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 12:31:12PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > I can do the upload if you like, unless you have a preference for > George's doing it. Ping on IRC is OK too. No problem by me :-) Thanks! -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A90

Re: RFS: gxemul segfault bugfix

load. :) Exactly, unstable is in much better shape. Release team are aware that this one throws nasty lintian stuff out :-) -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 Sending of encrypted mail is encouraged signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: php-nexista

rrific tool. I > originally made a pear package, so making a debian package was a piece of > cake. Is this a new package needing a new sponsor or an updated package, in which case asking your original sponsor first is good manners? -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F

Re: php-nexista

1] /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt [2] man uscan -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 Sending of encrypted mail is encouraged signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: backintime (new)

/backintime_0.8.18-2.dsc -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 Sending of encrypted mail is encouraged signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: furl

ings. More fundamentally: What does furl do that other packages can't? We already have curl, lynx, wget and even telnet can be used to dump headers. Can you justify having this package in the archive? If you can, and you iron out these few wrinkles in your otherwise good package, I'm su

Re: RFS: furl

some reasoning, so that the requestor doesn't just re-open the RFP. -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 Sending of encrypted mail is encouraged signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Re: RFS: furl

chosen RFP into an ITP (intent to package), which means developers can give you some immediate feedback about its suitability before you even start work. I hope this hasn't put you off packaging something else instead! -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D

RFS: adtool (adoption)

d at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/adtool/adtool_1.3-2.dsc Thanks in advance, -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 Sending of encrypted mail is encouraged signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: adtool (adoption)

that's almost never needed when autotools are used. Ok, I'll address those now - would you like a version bump? > - not directly related to your packaging, it looks like CSS are missing >on your gitweb. It's the stock debian package, so I'll look into that when I ha

Re: RFS: adtool (adoption)

are used. Gone Same package version is on mentors, if you've time to take a look. Cheers -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 Sending of encrypted mail is encouraged signature.asc Description: Digital signature

RFS: whohas (bug fixes)

/pool/main/w/whohas/whohas_0.21-3.dsc Cheers -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 Sending of encrypted mail is encouraged signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: whohas (bug fixes)

al, but then again most of them have been because of incorrect urls in the various package searchers, so perhaps not. Do you have any thoughts? TIA. Jonathan -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 Sending of encrypted mail is encouraged signature.asc Description: Digital signature

RFS: gxemul (new upstream)

there's no hurry. The dsc is at http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gxemul/gxemul_0.4.7-1.dsc Cheers Jonathan -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 Sending of encrypted mail is encouraged signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: gxemul (new upstream)

to lose dpatch now it has done its job :-) I've also now published the git repository and added Vcs-* fields to debian/control. Uploaded as before (let me know if you'd prefer a version bump). Thanks for the quick reply! Jonathan -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DC

RFS: rednotebook (NEW)

/rednotebook/rednotebook_0.4.0-1.dsc Thanks in advance, -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 Sending of encrypted mail is encouraged signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: whohas (bug fixes)

r patch to the version on m.d.n under the same number, but thankfully it's been much quieter the last few days :-) Cheers Jonathan -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 Sending of encrypted mail is encouraged signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: rednotebook (NEW)

investigate it when I have some time and in the meantime, sending the RFS to -python. Thanks for the tip! -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 Sending of encrypted mail is encouraged signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: lottanzb

es. You might want to revise your short description a bit and make it clear that this is for downloading newsbins, not reading newsgroups. Just little things, but that will make your package all the more ready for a sponsor to upload. [1] http://manpage.fr/man1/dh [2] /usr/share/doc/debhelper/examples/r

Re: RFS: lottanzb

icker. [1] http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/PythonAppsPackagingTeam -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 Sending of encrypted mail is encouraged signature.asc Description: Digital signature

RFS: whohas (new upstream)

nd in debian/rules for it yet. If you wouldn't mind taking a look when you have chance, the dsc is http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/whohas/whohas_0.22-1.dsc Cheers Jonathan -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52

Re: RFS: whohas (new upstream)

i.debian.org/DeveloperNews > Feel free to update/change it. Good idea, thanks. Should it mention that whohas is still <1.0 and being heavily developed though? Or is the BTS mention enough? -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 Sending of

Re: RFS: whohas (new upstream)

README|NEWS.Debian), or would it be sufficient to just make it clear that this list might be slightly out of date? > Please add some debtags: > Please also add a screenshot of 0.22-1 (make sure to put in the right version) Will do. -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9

Re: RFS: whohas (new upstream)

a version bump when I upload? -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 Sending of encrypted mail is encouraged signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: whohas (new upstream)

On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 07:52:37PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: > Either is fine, slight leaning towards no need for a bump (so I don't > have to remember to use debuild -v...). NP, uploaded to the same location. -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A90

Re: RFH: dupload outguess.

x27;/', dinstall_runs => 1, passive => 1, }; Set passive appropriately, then use "dupload -t mentors " to upload your package. -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: whohas (new upstream)

On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 09:38:33AM +0200, George Danchev wrote: > > I'd appreciate if someone else could sponsor this for now; my > > internets are slow ATM. > > whohas 0.22-1 uploaded. Cheers! Jonathan -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21

Re: RFS: Sabacc

ew-package-should-close-itp-bug W: sabacc: wrong-bug-number-in-closes l3:# Full lintian output is attached. I haven't looked in much more details, have a go at these and if you need help ask, and we can see what kind of shape it's in after that. -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB

RFS: adtool (bugfix)

l, at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/adtool/adtool_1.3-3.dsc If you can take a look sometime that would be great. Cheers -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

RFS: webcpp (bug fix)

but I have also taken the opportunity to add DM-Upload-Allowed to the control file. If you want that out, by all means say so. The dsc is on mentors at http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/webcpp/webcpp_0.8.4-9.dsc Thanks in advance -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216

Re: dicomscope: open tasks

u...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: adtool (bugfix)

On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 06:16:45AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > I'll be taking a look later today. Did you get a chance yet? :-) Cheers -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: blimp

html#newpackage Hope that helps, -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

RFS: whohas (bugfix)

http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/whohas/whohas_0.22-2.dsc I haven't added DM-Upload-Allowed but if you're happy to, please go ahead. Or I'll prepare another upload if you'd prefer that. Cheers Jonathan -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3

Re: [uploaded] Re: RFS: whohas (bugfix)

1364.dpatch and > 15-honour-proxy-512902.dpatch which are fine. Thanks. Uploaded. Great, thanks! -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: blimp

er to get JIU into the archive, and save yourself the effort changing blimp later. -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: What to do if the original tarball contains a debian subdirectory

ow to handle this? (disclaimer: IANADD) I would add a blank debian/files file, and override lintian with a suitable explanatory comment. -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.

RFS: whohas (bugfixes)

find the dsc at http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/whohas/whohas_0.22-3.dsc Thanks -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: whohas (bugfixes)

On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 01:31:16PM +, Martin Meredith wrote: > Uploaded, couldn't find any issues. Cheers :-) -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

RFS: copher (bugfix)

n/c/copher/copher_0.1.2+20081201-2.dsc Thanks in advance -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: sqldeveloper-package

tially waste time on a package that is duplicate, unneccessary or otherwise not going to go into the archive. -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: clamfs (updated package)

On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 05:24:02PM +0100, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.0-1 > of my package "clamfs". IANADD, but one improvement I see you could make: debian/control: s/An user-space/user-space/ -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP

Re: adapting a dpatch to changed source: how?

ges into a new or existing patch, to make the process less repetitive and prone to mistakes. That's all. -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: adapting a dpatch to changed source: how?

opy reconstruct the patched source - take a diff of this against its original, and you get a patch - use dpatch-edit-patch to create a new patch against the original, apply the difference, and capture it -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0

Re: adapting a dpatch to changed source: how?

d debian/patched || install -d debian/patched > dpatch apply-all > applying patch 01_build_xml to ./ ... failed. > make: *** [patch-stamp] Error 1 > > Besides, if I created a new patch, how would I get rid of the old one? rm it, and remove its entry in 00list. -- Jonathan Wil

Re: adapting a dpatch to changed source: how?

ere might be a DD around who can help too.) Thanks -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS:qelectrotech

file by hand too. You could also consider making your changes to qelectrotech.pro and sources/qet.h with a patch system instead of directly. If anything doesn't make sense please ask. -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

  1   2   3   >