; I wouldn't think there's much point in doing both.
It's useful if upstream has a slow release schedule or you want a fix
backported to older versions in Debian. But then you should also
probably include the patch yourself.
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
an/copyright says LGPL 2.
Once these are fixed, I would be happy to sponsor this.
Just a warning (for you and upstream, if you didn't know) -- Pygame's
MPEG support, and pygame.mixer.music in general, are both very flakey.
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 22:16 +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> --- Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> > Some issues:
> >
> > Your debian/control should not depend directly on "python", but use
> > "${python:Depends}" and call dh
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 22:38 +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> --- Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> >
> > --- Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> >
> > > Some issues:
> > >
> > > Your debian/control should not dep
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 23:21 +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> --- Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> > > Why can't it be used with python 2.4?
> >
> > The modules are byte-compiled for Python 2.3, and should be recompiled
> > when Debian ships
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 00:08 +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> Joe Wreschnig wrote:
>
> > The pyc files are generated in the postinst, you won't see them in dpkg
> > -L/-c output.
>
> So, if you upgrade to a newer version of python, it won't work, as the
> compil
, please use the feedparser module present in
Debian if you can (python-feedparser). Duplicating a large body of
network-sensitive and do-what-I-mean code is rarely a good idea.
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
soon now", and NEW queue appears to be at least a week, this may
even be faster than waiting for a new python-gst0.10 to pass NEW.
I know this is not a very good answer. Sorry. Debian doesn't have very
good Python packages.
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ze it.
No, the error message sucks, it doesn't distinguish between two
different (completely unrelated) failures. I reported this earlier
as http://bugs.debian.org/358253 when I was trying to get Byzanz
compiled.
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
assuming
they're entirely private to synfig. Similar cases (e.g. XMMS plugins,
Python extensions) also do not have versioned names.
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
st saying, "look,
only 50% of applicants get in!" is not a valid criticism of it either.
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ules"
break all the time).
If Debian is going to buck the trend here (and I think it should, and
thankfully does for many programs) a lot of packages are buggy.
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
if possible, but if I do that, I can't easily call rake from the
> clean target, which seems like a bigger problem.
For such a small patch, ignoring dpatch is fine and probably preferable.
(Other, dpatch-liking people, may disagree with me about this.)
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
t support ID3v2, it has major bugs
(#369260), it's not locale-aware. mp3rename and lltag do the same thing,
and many graphical tools do it better.
If you have a pressing need for its particular command line syntax, it
looks very easy to wrap around an existing, better library.
--
Joe Wreschnig
ere are no rdeps on it now, so it might
be worthwhile to remove it. But again, it's not a bug.
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
etimes you get a sponsor right away,
sometimes you don't.
As it happens, I'm looking for a good image gallery program. I'll check
out Salonify; if it does what I want, and no one else steps up before
that, I'll sponsor the package.
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 18:31, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> It _is_ so.
> Definitely.
I was approved 7 months ago, with no package in the archive. This is
clearly *not* exclusively the case.
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
mpatible exit codes (which most MUAs understand).
I would be very interested in sponsoring this, but I get connection
refused trying to connect to your server.
> These packages can be obtained via apt-get here:
> deb http://digitalssg.net/debian ./
> deb-src http://digitalssg.net/debian
obtained via apt-get here:
> deb http://digitalssg.net/debian ./
> deb-src http://digitalssg.net/debian ./
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Failed to fetch some archives.
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 11:57:28AM -0600, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
> > Okay, the URL is working for me now.
> >
> > On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 16:53, Jess Mahan wrote:
> > > Hi, I would like to get a sponsor. I am new to sponsorship/manitai
FHS (anymore?). I think /usr/bin is
> the right place for it.
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#REQUIREMENTS9
It's still there.
(Please don't scare me like that in the future.)
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 12:17, Brian Nelson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 01:59:03AM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 22:09, Brian Nelson wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 10:00:31PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 11:
y packages can be downloaded from:
> > <http://www.icecavern.net/~wjl/debian/mimms/>
>
> It's been more than a week so I guess I'll ping again: any interest in
> sponsoring this package? =)
I'm interested, but I won't be able to get around to
h... well I have many spare time right now so I try to use it for
> Debian ;)
If this time isn't going to be consistently available, then I might
recommend cutting back; Debian is as much about maintaining packages as
it is about creating them.
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
can
> you help me out?
ftp://incoming.debian.org/pub/UploadQueue/README
The 'dcut' tool (in the dput package) will output these kind of files if
you happen to forget the exact format yourself.
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
h... well I have many spare time right now so I try to use it for
> Debian ;)
If this time isn't going to be consistently available, then I might
recommend cutting back; Debian is as much about maintaining packages as
it is about creating them.
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
can
> you help me out?
ftp://incoming.debian.org/pub/UploadQueue/README
The 'dcut' tool (in the dput package) will output these kind of files if
you happen to forget the exact format yourself.
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
FHS (anymore?). I think /usr/bin is
> the right place for it.
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#REQUIREMENTS9
It's still there.
(Please don't scare me like that in the future.)
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 12:17, Brian Nelson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 01:59:03AM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 22:09, Brian Nelson wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 10:00:31PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 11:
ore, most, gedit,
I don't know what else people are using these days) probably handle it
even less gracefully.
(I have no strong opinion one way or another -- I'm fine skipping past
binary parts, and being able to include non-uuencoded binaries is a
pretty cool deal. It works around one of my least-favorite packaging
tasks. But then, skipping past binary diffs would probably become my new
least-favorite task.)
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 08:48 +0100, ClÃment Stenac wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Libcddb is a small C library to access the CDDB database (Audio CD
> database). It can query any CDDB server, default server is freedb.org
> Licence is LGPL.
What advantages does this have over libcdaudio?
--
already in
> Debian? Or why would someone want to use WMAnsiEd instead of one of the
> other ANSI editors?
And if it is better, is there another package we can remove because its
features are entirely a subset of WMAnsiEd's?
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
can have files in /etc be *conffiles*, which is one
possibly implementation of the requirements policy sets for
configuration files.
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
rovide a picture of a photo ID (old passport or
college) signed by my GPG key, however.
--
- Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.sacredchao.net
"What I did was justified because I had a policy of my own... It's
okay to be different, to not conform to society."
Is there a good tutorial/reference anywhere for how to package (Linux)
kernel modules and source, in a way that works with make-kpkg's
modules_image?
--
- Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
drive anyway, so it would be a major pain for me to get anywhere
else.
TIA.
--
- Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
has a Debian changelog mode, and there's a program called "dch",
but I don't use either. You can just use a normal text editor.
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ople 3 years, but YMMV.
(n.b. This is not a defense of the NM process, nor a statement saying
something is horribly broken. I don't know enough about it to comment in
general. However, that was my experience in it.)
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
etimes you get a sponsor right away,
sometimes you don't.
As it happens, I'm looking for a good image gallery program. I'll check
out Salonify; if it does what I want, and no one else steps up before
that, I'll sponsor the package.
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 18:31, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> It _is_ so.
> Definitely.
I was approved 7 months ago, with no package in the archive. This is
clearly *not* exclusively the case.
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
codes (which most MUAs understand).
I would be very interested in sponsoring this, but I get connection
refused trying to connect to your server.
> These packages can be obtained via apt-get here:
> deb http://digitalssg.net/debian ./
> deb-src http://digitalssg.net/debian ./
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ained via apt-get here:
> deb http://digitalssg.net/debian ./
> deb-src http://digitalssg.net/debian ./
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Failed to fetch some archives.
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 11:57:28AM -0600, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
> > Okay, the URL is working for me now.
> >
> > On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 16:53, Jess Mahan wrote:
> > > Hi, I would like to get a sponsor. I am new to sponsorship/manitaini
y packages can be downloaded from:
> > <http://www.icecavern.net/~wjl/debian/mimms/>
>
> It's been more than a week so I guess I'll ping again: any interest in
> sponsoring this package? =)
I'm interested, but I won't be able to get around to
rovide a picture of a photo ID (old passport or
college) signed by my GPG key, however.
--
- Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.sacredchao.net
"What I did was justified because I had a policy of my own... It's
okay to be different, to not conform to society."
Is there a good tutorial/reference anywhere for how to package (Linux)
kernel modules and source, in a way that works with make-kpkg's
modules_image?
--
- Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
drive anyway, so it would be a major pain for me to get anywhere
else.
TIA.
--
- Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
some bugs
against ftp.debian.org to remove the old ddrmat-source package first?
Thanks.
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
cs has a Debian changelog mode, and there's a program called "dch",
but I don't use either. You can just use a normal text editor.
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ople 3 years, but YMMV.
(n.b. This is not a defense of the NM process, nor a statement saying
something is horribly broken. I don't know enough about it to comment in
general. However, that was my experience in it.)
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
50 matches
Mail list logo
