On Sun, 2003-07-13 at 09:16, Jepri wrote: > On 2003.07.14 08:26, Jamin W. Collins wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 05:15:49PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > > > Also that is but one of many people waiting on the list for an > > excessive > > amount of time, what about all the others? Do you consider the wait > > times listed as reasonable and to be expected? As I believe I've made > > very clear, I don't. > > > And also, it discouraged me from applying for new maintainer - I > figured if some people were waiting for two or three years I would have > no hope of getting in in less time.
While I don't know if this kind of wait is normal, it is not exclusively the case. I was processed recently and within a short amount of time. http://nm.debian.org/nmstatus.php DAM approval took a month after my AM approved me. As far as I know, I wasn't "fast tracked" or anything, I did every part of the process. I had not had any packages sponsored prior to my application (I had maintained a public APT archive however), and was marginally (at best) active on -devel and -legal. So, it might take people 3 years, but YMMV. (n.b. This is not a defense of the NM process, nor a statement saying something is horribly broken. I don't know enough about it to comment in general. However, that was my experience in it.) -- Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]