Hi,
>Now I already have acess to collab-maint (though I didn't do any work
>yet), and I have become DM [0].
you already are a DM, you need the guest account, but it isn't requested
for collab-maint access
>Could you kindly help to set up a git repo for shadowsocks-libev on
collab-maint?
./
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
* Pali Rohár , 2016-06-29, 21:01:
> * New upstream release:
>Closes: #672839, #272648, #606664, #715720, #716102, #716287, #727634
>Closes: #727636, #775273, #539530, #680272
1) indeed, please list them separately, with a brief explan
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python3-adns". This package is a
>Debian packaging of the Python 3 port of python-adns, found at
>>https://mentors.debian.net/sponsors/rfs-howto/python3-adns, with minor fixes.
>My sources are at http
Hi,
>However, ftp-master rejected the upload, I reopen this ticket.
>I'm sorry that I miss-checked the license under man/ folder.
>
>I search GFDL, and find [0][1]
>
>[0] https://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001
>[1] https://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses
>
>So if my understanding is correct, I thi
Hi,
>> you already are a DM, you need the guest account, but it isn't requested
>> for collab-maint access
>
>You mean guest account of porterbox, right?
>I already applied, and got approved. It's for debug FTBFS of libcork
>on s390x/ppc64/sparc64.
>
>For access collab-maint, guest account of ali
Hi,
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-hdf5storage"
LGTM, uploaded!
G.
control: owner -1 !
Hi,
>You might consider re-running dch -r to refresh the timestamp in the
>changelog so it lies after all our changes.
and ping when ready :)
G.
Hi,
>Is experimental available for this purpose?
it is, I'm uploading shortly, I did a dget
changed unstable to experimental in changelog, and if everything is good I'll
upload
BTW skimage didn't migrate
https://packages.qa.debian.org/s/skimage.html
I would prefer to avoid overriding of the
and I'll upload it on experimental.
After that, we can just remove the bad binaries.
(do not break+replace on them, I don't think there is need if we are quick
enough)
G.
On 1 July 2016 at 12:38, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
Hi,
>
>
>>Is experimental available for this
we can't as said before.
Il Venerdì 1 Luglio 2016 17:12, Lumin ha scritto:
Control: reopen -1
Give me five minutes and about 5 minutes to mentors,
Can we overwrite the -1 version ...
There are too many changes between -1 and -2 ...
On 1 July 2016 at 15:06, Gianfranco Costa
#x27;m checking the difference between -1 and HEAD now.
Will open another RFS for -2.
It's my fault that I didn't perform any mentors upload after
I started the python3 transition ... So the mentors package
keeps old ...
On 1 July 2016 at 15:19, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
we can't
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I'd like to get a few changes I've made to newlisp uploaded. They
>basically fix two bugs: 828805 and 828806.
>
>The changes are:
>
>- Support GNU/kFreeBSD builds (by creating the necessary makefiles and
> adjusting source files accordingly), and
>
>- Do not use -m32
Hi,
>I expect tail -f /dev/null to be close enough in behavior to
>pause(3), even though it does something else internally.
yes, indeed even if it might be not the best in efficiency [1]
somebody suggested "sleep inf" or "sleep infinity".
[1]
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/42901/ho
control: tags -1 moreinfo
control: owner -1 !
Hi,
lets see
>found information on
>https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736360 which seems to
>suggest the problem was still contentious two years ago. Should I keep
>overriding this warning?
I suggest to leave things as is
1) apt i
Hi,
gpvdm ping
(I wrote a review on the bug, months ago)
G.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
>Hm, this is actually only needed for GNU/kFreeBSD, which uses -lncurses
>on the linking phase. I updated Build-Depends to reflect that.
wonderful
>Yeah, it was just a simple sed command to remove things from all
>Makefiles. But it seems I did not specify the right set of files to
>appl
you were lucky I used deferred.
dcutting and reuploading.
G.
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package ‘jquery-throttle-debounce’:
I'm not completely satisfied with the packaing, sorry!
look e.g. to the various node-* packages, they seem to be "clean" in the
debian directory, your packaging seems more
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package ‘xkcdpass’, version “1.6.3-1”.
I like xkcd, so I'll look at it :)
^L
%:
why do you have some extra chars in your files? your packaging seems full of
bad line endings, my vim is sad to look at them!
Hi,
>Still nothing. I had read the page, but it mentions the format of the
>.commands file, and not dcut's CLI options. I also tried specifying the
>options in a different order, but I get the same error.
dcut ftp-master reschedule -d 0 -f newlisp_10.7.0-2_source.changes
this works for dpu
control: owner -1 !
>In my view evil-paredit-el is ready to be uploaded, bar `dch -r`.
ping,
G.
Hi,
>Can you point me to specific parts that you want to be cleaner, and how
>they should be cleaned?
your rules file is 83 lines, most node packages are about 3-4 lines
e.g.
https://sources.debian.net/src/node-recast/0.11.4-2/debian/rules/
>Thank you for finding those, I will remove the file.
Hi
>I don't know of any extra characters. Which ones do you think are
>extra?
>debian/rules: a /usr/bin/make -f script,
> UTF-8 Unicode text executable
I did leave only one of that "^L" lines
hexdump debian/rules
000 0a0c
002
(attached)
seems t
Hi,
your package doesn't support arch:all builds...
can you please prepare a new upload?
(I'm afraid it will need to go in new queue :( )
G.
Hi,
>Appears to be good, uploaded.
>Thanks for your work!
thanks for sponsoring, I looked at the package, but I didn't have time to look
properly
at it and reply here :)
I admit I'm a little bit lost on this change
(my fault! to be clear, this is why I'm redirecting to -mentors mail list)
a
Hi,
>> your package doesn't support arch:all builds...
"dpkg-buildpackage -A" <-- this is broken, and your package didn't build on
debian
buildd systems
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=xkcdpass&suite=unstable
this requires a fix or a new binary upload
(I'm a fan of source only
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
>Have you coordinated with Dimitri? When the regular maintainer is active,
>NMUs are appropriate for urgent changes, not for regular work. Ie, instead
>of random sponsors, I'd suggest letting him do uploads.
>
>As you've helped with this package
Hi Christian, thanks for the help and answer!
I admit it looked wrong to me too, but your explanation is perfect!
so, I would have changed the symbols file in this way:
libu2f-host.so.0 libu2f-host0 #MINVER#
U2F_HOST_0.0@U2F_HOST_0.0 0.0
+ U2F_HOST_1.1@U2F_HOST_1.1 1.1.2
u2fh_authenticate@U2F_HOS
Hi
>So yes, I believe that's ABI compatible as well.
thanks for confirming!
>(Also, the fact that upstream uses symbol versioning, and uses
>it correctly, indicates to me that they understand this, and this
>gives me confidence in that they are unlikely to screw up when it
>comes to ABI-compatib
Hi,
>As per Developer's Reference §5.11.1 this should have been uploaded to
>DELAYED/10 at least.
In general you are right, but in this case upstream and Debian maintainers
seems to be the same people, and they acked the other NMUs in a matter of
minutes.
https://github.com/Yubico/libu2f-hos
Hi,
>It appears your libfakeroot_1.21-1_i386.deb is corrupt, the
>download somehow didn't work properly. Try deleting
>$APTCACHE/libfakeroot_1.21-1_i386.deb, where $APTCACHE is the
>value of the variable in your pbuilderrc (defaults to
>/var/cache/pbuilder/aptcache) and trying again. (It should re
Hi Christian
>On actual package files or just the "Packages" / "Contents"
>files while pbuilder is doing "apt-get update"? If it's the
>latter, that problem should not exist anymore for stretch
>and/or sid (search "by-hash" in that email):
>
>https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2016/
Hi, providing some logs:
>On actual package files or just the "Packages" / "Contents">files while
>pbuilder is doing "apt-get update"? If it's the
>latter, that problem should not exist anymore for stretch
>and/or sid (search "by-hash" in that email):
>
>https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-an
Hi,
>But to me this appears to indicate a proxy server that truncates
>files in some cases, which is definitely a bug in the proxy
>server.
>
>Unfortunately, that's the worst kind of reason for your problem,
>because that's the most troublesome to debug. :-(
I fully agree here, this is why I d
Hi David!
>(thankfully, apt/experimental has some improvements in terms of error
>reporting which help here. Hash sum mismatch messages used to be
>borderline useless – now they still are, but are very talkative ;)
>That said, I am a bit surprised its installed in your chroot…)
$ aptitude --ver
Hi
>debian/changelog:
>dvbackup (1:0.0.4-8) unstable; urgency=low ( I am doing )
>dvbackup (1:0.0.4-7) unstable; urgency=low ( current version )
>
>After 'debuild':
>
sure, it has an epoch since a lot of time
https://packages.qa.debian.org/d/dvbackup/news/20120512T030239Z.html
I don't know de
Hi,
>I'm not entirely sure, but it's been like this since forever.
I guess a filename containing ":" character might be problematic in linux
(not techically problematic, but better to avoid escapes)
so, even if the filename is
"dvbackup_0.0.4-7_amd64.changes", the content is:
dvbackup (1:0.0.4-
Hi,
>This PR is written to solve some glitches about RFS template.
another feature request:
the template has also the subject, e.g.
ITP, NMU, RC, QA, and so on, but there seems to be one missing entry for
"regular update"
it would be nice to use rmadison to see if the package is already on
unst
>
>Besides, it'd be appreciated if you also can setup DM upload
>permission of this package for me, after this upload.
>Thank you!
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/271663979/buildlog_ubuntu-yakkety-amd64.libcork_0.15.0+ds-4_BUILDING.txt.gz
the multiarch stuff is broken in yakkety now.
G.
control: owner -1 x...@debian.org
Hi Dimitri!
>lowNMU is not meant for hostile takeovers of the package, ok?! =)
sure, this is why only one NMU was done on your package :)
>And I have accepted some patches from you, not all, and I did respond
>to you about that.
>
>The urgency about the updat
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-qtpy"
missing copyrights:
e.g.
qtpy/_patch/qcombobox.py
qtpy/uic.py
Thomas Robitaille
other stuff LGTM
G.
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>Thanks for all your help reviewing my package!
the package is quite simple, but I would appreciate something more
verbose when calling it with wrong parameters.
e.g.
sct
sct -h
sct -v
sct 10
sudo sct 10
sudo sct 14
all gives no output.
After readin
Hi,
>On >Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 09:48:18AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>> Or to see if the changelog contains only one single entry (but this isn't
>> error-prone
>> because many people are bumping changelog without having it uploaded yet)
>
>What di
Hi,
>I am looking at upgrading my gpg key.
>
>What parameters should I use?
>
>Is there a standard way to get all the people that signed
>the old key to sign the new key?
some general answering should tell that it is up to the developers to
sign the new one, or ask you to meet in person.
"tru
HI,
>>Thank you for feedback.
>>But I hadn't ever seen such tag.
>>https://mentors.debian.net/sponsor/rfs-howto
>
>There's no standard tag for this, and I don't think we need one.
>
>If there's no tag in the subject, then the upload is supposed to be
>"regular".
I bet to disagree sir :)
I perso
Hi,
>H. I see your fixbadproxy config being copied, so I wonder whats up,
>but its quite obvious that the options didn't take effect at all as, as
>mentioned (in the quote), the first two are very noisy.
interestingly enough, it works on my machine, but it doesn't under pbuilder
chroots, ev
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ifstat"
here we are sir
>More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.example.com.
interesting website, indeed!
> * Update to debhelper version 9 (Closes: #817499, #828348).
> * Add mu
Hi,
>This has been fixed. Now when -h is passed usage is printed and if the
>temperature passed is wrong usage will also be printed.
I still see nothing when called with no parameters :)
(well you might print something like "temperature reset to the default value
(65K) or similar)
BTW
If no
Hi,
>K == Kelvin, not kilo.
this is what happens when one person is not using google :)
thanks you all!
G.
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fatx":
>http://sourceforge.net/projects/fatx
there is no source of a debian directory to look at.
we need the source, not the binary, and please upload it
on mentors.debian.net (where you can find a lot of documentation and
Hi,
>I've uploaded it with dput on mentors.debian.net.
and it got rejected it seems
Hi
>Ok - TL;DR; from stuff I was discussing with Paul Wise. Budgie-Desktop is
>definitely not Debian deb-helper friendly. With a standard v9 debhelper -
>even with a >override_autoreconf, override_autoreconfigure etc, it appears
>from first glance that the compilation works. However on insta
Hi,
>
>Aren't there different rationales for source and binary package names?
>This is what I have been thinking:
>
>- source package name should be upstream's name, because it's the
> *source*
>- binary package name is whatever makes most sense for someone typing
> apt-get
Indeed, I didn't lo
>AI have sent it to p80.pool.sks-keyservers.net and keys.gnupg.net according to
>"https://wiki.debian.org/Keysigning#Step_7:_Send_your_signed_key_to_the_server";
nope, you have to add it to your account IIRC
mentors.debian.org, login and add it.
G.
ackage ?
Regards,
CD
- Mail original -
De: "Gianfranco Costamagna"
À: "christophe duverger"
Cc: 830...@bugs.debian.org
Envoyé: Mardi 12 Juillet 2016 14:36:00
Objet: Re: Bug#830845: RFS: fatx/1.11-1 [ITP] -- Complete XBOX filesystem
support
>AI have sent it t
Hi (please cc the bug)
>I removed it, but does it do any harm?
no, I guess not
>Might have something to do with -fPIE vs. -fPIC, but one would have to
>investigate further to be sure. This is definitely not a regression,
>though, since the z3 version currently in the archive has no hardening
>f
Hi,
>I have been working on packaging a new version of scid (4.6.2); the version in
>Debian is outdated (from 2014).
>I tried to contact Oliver, the actual mantainer, a month ago and haven't
>received response yet. I tried it twice.
The maintainer has an ongoing MIA process, and he didn't answ
Hi!
TLTR, Tiago seems to be *completely* correct here, you didn't state the package
name,
so you might want to try to grasp a solution before reading this email.
But *please* read it eventually, because the Python3 package is probably broken
>I have packaged a Python library which has support
control: reopen -1
reopening.
G.
Il Mercoledì 13 Luglio 2016 18:45, Debian Bug Tracking System
ha scritto:
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2016 16:40:55 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: z3/4.4.1-0.1 [NMU] [4xRC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #830569,
regarding RFS: z3/
Hi Herbert
>Hey, thanks for spent some time with the package!
thanks for updating it :)
>But I am working on 1.2.0. I belive you got the last
>version from git repository, 0.1.5.
yeah, sure!
BTW I see it in deferred/1, but you didn't push on git... :)
if you want to do it, I can see the chan
Hi Dmitry
>FAIL camldbm_1.0-2.dsc | PATCH
>FAIL courier_0.73.1-1.6.dsc
>FAIL freeradius_2.2.8+dfsg-0.1.dsc | PATCH
>FAIL ifmail_2.14tx8.10-22.dsc | PATCH
>FAIL nis_3.17-34.dsc | FTPFS pre-history debhelper
>FAIL ntop_5.0.1+dfsg1-2.1.dsc | FTBFS issues with rrd
>FAIL o
Hi,
>https://mentors.debian.net/package/django-notification
>https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/django-notification/django-notification_1.2.0-1.dsc
I have some nitpicks :)
"usign" <-- typo
"python" "python3" should be used with upper case "P"
I did a debdiff between unstable and me
control: tags -1 moreinfo
control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/Yubico/libu2f-server-dpkg/issues/4
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libu2f-server"
>I am aware that sponsored NMUs are not a sane way to maintain this
>package in the long term. As such, I reached out to the pkg-auth t
control: tags -1 moreinfo
control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/Yubico/pam-u2f-dpkg/issues/3
control: owner 830908 !
control: owner -1 !
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pam-u2f"
lets see:
--- pam-u2f-1.0.3/debian/libpam-u2f.manpages1970-01-01 01:00:00.0
+0100
+++ pam
Hi Jakub
>Typo:
>an QA upload -> an QA upload
I fail to see differences...
did you mean "a QA upload"?
/me is not really sure about the correct wording :)
G.
Hi,
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libcork/0.15.0+ds-5
some hours ago, I had to retry the build on amd64 and i386 archs if I remember
correctly.
Retrying the build was fine
(I remember it failed for testsuite failures)
bug closed,
thanks
G.
Hi,
>Merging the Python 3 modifications into the Python 2 code would mean to make a
>lot of changes to the stable Python 2 code. There is a high likeliness that
>the >currently stable Python 2 code would not work correctly in some rare
>cases any more. So, it is better to leave the stable Pytho
Hi Sergio
>Yeah, uscan is the responsible for invoking mk-origtargz. That can be a
>problem indeed for cases like yours.
do you have a solution for virtualbox-guest-additions-iso package?
the same happens here since the orig file is an iso file :)
thanks,
(I invoke debian/get-orig-source.sh
Hi,
>I think Lintian is trying to tell you in veiled way that you should use
>a better VCS. :-P
Indeed! even subversion developers migrated to git! [1]
I propose a new lintian error.
"please migrate to a better VCS" :)
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/infra-7524
(just to be clea
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "groonga"
I put the package on deferred/5, because I have one question:
looking at the patch:
--- a/vendor/nginx-1.11.1/src/event/ngx_event_openssl.c
+++ b/vendor/nginx-1.11.1/src/event/ngx_event_opens
Hi Sergio,
>Oh, I have a solution! Get rid of this proprietary software on Debian!
>;-)
lol :)
>Seriously, though. I've also had to do a few modifications to the
>get-orig-source.sh script, and you'll also need to run uscan with the
>--no-symlink option, but this should work. Oh, and you w
Hi,
>Symbols files are usually better since you get more fine grained
>control of dependencies, but they take a lot more time to maintain
>(especially for C++ libraries).
In this very specific case, I think we don't need it, as I explained here [1]
and you can see how upstream is taking serious
Hi,
>I don't see what upstream dedication to ABI compatibility has to to with
>symbol files.
typo :)
>Anyway, the reason we're having this thread is because apparently
>libjsoncpp broke ABI without SONAME change, so maybe they're not taking
>it seriously enough. :>
actually after sending
Hi,
>http://abi-laboratory.pro/tracker/
thanks, I asked upstream
https://github.com/open-source-parsers/jsoncpp/issues/499
>It might be interesting to have a service like this for all Debian
>packages containing C/C++/Java libraries.
that would save a lot of segfaults and time :)
thanks,
G
>>Seriously, though. I've also had to do a few modifications to the
Hi,
>Sorry, forgot to change the error message. The correct is 2.
committed and pushed :)
thanks!
G.
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cdist"
here we are
>http://mentors.debian.net/package/cdist
E404
missing copyrights:
e.g.
# 2016 Darko Poljak (darko.poljak at gmail.com)
# 2015-2016 Steven Armstrong (steven-cdist at armstron
Hi
> I put the package on deferred/5, because I have one question:
I rescheduled in deferred/10 a few seconds ago
please give a feedback
G.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi
>wifite.py has the license statement in the header, IMHO this is sufficient.
after looking at the github repo, I see the project is made of a single py file,
so the internal statement might be good already!
Anyway, I opened an "upstream" issue [1]
>It should be no problem to create a tarball m
Hi,
>I am looking for a sponsor to upload the package "cgit" to
>jessie-backports. I have been added to the backports ACL for
>subsequent maintenance.
I'm on it :)
G.
Hi,
>by the way, what means ENOTIME?
this is a standard error, unfortunately :)
https://docs.python.org/2/library/errno.html
it means "I have not enough time right now"
G.
control: reopen -1
control: unarchive -1
control: owner -1 jgoer...@complete.org
On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 04:33:09 + Bart Martens wrote:
> Package syncterm has been removed from mentors.
lets try to cc everybody :)
thanks
G.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "scid":
lets see.
1)
The package will be probably orphaned in 10-15 days, so you might want to set
yourself
as Maintainer and adopt it
2)
+* Copyright (C) 2013-2015 Fulvio Benini
maybe you want also t
last thing:
4) this hack seems useless now
sed s/x86_64-linux-gnu/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)/ configure > configure.sed
chmod 755 configure.sed
./configure.sed BINDIR="$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/scid/usr/games" \
G.
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>ITYM 5.7.
Indeed, please fix.
since I reported the upstream issues, and did a lot of work on gammaray, I'll
sponsor the
package.
Review:
1)
Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-kde/kde-extras/gammaray.git
Vcs-Browser:
https://anonscm.debia
Hi,
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-prov"
as usual, built signed and sponsored.
G.
Hi,
>Can't reproduce it. The only warning I have is
I did a build a few hours ago on DoM
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/lostirc/0.4.6-5/buildlog
flags seems all in place.
but I might have missed some of them,
G.
His one is in new queue since an hour, so mine will be just rejected.
g.
Hi,
>sorry, thats because I put lintian-overrides.
mmm AFAIK DebOMatic looks also for overridden tags.
G.
Lets finish the review:
1)
grep copyright . -Ri
missing people
2)
debian/upstream/changelog
what^
3) did you forward patches upstream?
if you can fix/answer the above I think we are good
check-all-the-things review:
$ codespell --quiet-level=3
./config.c:169: unkown ==> unknown
./lsm.c:137
Hi,
>Who missing? I've checked, it's okay.
you right
>About that, it's a new version with some patches I've forwarded.
>I'll wait for this version get in Debian to investigate the new version
>changes.
I can sponsor, or wait, let me know.
G.
Hi,
>asciinema
>git.debian.org:/git/pkg-go/packages/asciinema.git
>https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/asciinema/asciinema_1.2.0-1.dsc
does the package looks like the old one to the end user?
if yes, please keep the previous changelog entries, the end user shouldn't care
too much about
On 27/07/2016 19:41, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
>
> Hello, I am looking for DD to sponsor my request for access a portbox
> to debug #832544, #832543.
>
> Clear-signed information, required by DSA team is attached.
>
> --
I support you having access to a porterbox, even if I'm not sure you should
po
Hi,
>I have an issue with the new version of my package free42-nologo. I
>../free42-nologo_1.4.77.orig.tar.{bz2,gz,lzma,xz} no upstream tarball ...
pull-debian-source free42-nologo
or
dget -u
http://http.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/free42-nologo/free42-nologo_1.4.77-1.1.dsc
or click here
Hi,
>Plus, aptitude is broken on many (but not all) archs when used
>together with qemu-user-static (segfaults), so if you use that
>kind of chroot together with pbuilder, in my experience you need
>to revert to the classic satisfydepends (which is much slower)
>to make pbuilder work properly.
Hi,
>PS: can I ping you when I have the new asciinema package?
I'm not a go developer, so somebody from your team might be better suitable
to look at the packages, but you can count on me as a backup sponsor.
(BTW go seems a really nice and funny language, so I might learn it one day)
and if
Hi,
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "caffe-contrib"
its in
G.
Hi,
>For debootstrap? No. For pbuilder? Yes.
I'm pretty sure it is a qemu missing feature or bug, but I reported it to
aptitude package [1]. Feel free to add useful bits here :)
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/832710
G.
Hi,
>Anyone still willing to sponsor my request, please?
I sent the signed email for you, but the real question is:
why aren't you a DM or a DD?
I was almost sure you were already a DM, this is why I didn't get
the mail to send question (as DM you just need to apply from nm.d.o website
for gues
>
To: ad...@rt.debian.org, kact...@gnu.org
From: Gianfranco Costamagna
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <3431e236-2138-4a38-922e-816337b87...@debian.org>
Message-ID: <4eaecb72-c784-2724-a67d-77877e3a3...@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 20:36:34 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
Hi,
>Missing space between "Debian" and "RT".
indeed, that did the trick
>Also, neither the subject nor the body say what you are actually asking
>for...
actually I tried 4 times, with changes in subject and signing type, but I didn't
get it correctly both :)
>"Requests need to be clear-sig
101 - 200 of 1488 matches
Mail list logo
