Hi debian mentors,
skype4py was removed on unstable because unmaintained and not so much used.
Anyway I think now that is actively maintained again would be nice to get it
into debian again,
http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/skype4py.html
I made it available on mentors, I can package it and take
Il Domenica 23 Febbraio 2014 10:39, Bart Martens ha scritto:
Hi Gianfranco,
>
Hi Bart and debian mentors, first sorry for the late reply.
>I have two questions for you.
>
>1. The patch makes the program use one additional position of the memory
>pointed to by buf. Are you sure that there
Hi, a quick search on codesearch.d.n [1] shows that armadillo might be your
answer :)
[1] https://codesearch.debian.net/results/arma_H5T_NATIVE_DOUBLE/page_0
G.
Il Lunedì 30 Maggio 2016 11:10, Andreas Tille ha scritto:
Hi,
I intend to backport seer[1] but I was running into a build issue:
Hi Andreas,
>installed while a build in a Jessie+backports chroot fails. Do you think the
>solution is that simple as backporting armadillo 6.700.6+dfsg-1 ?
pbuilder-dist jessie login,
enable backports
apt-get build-dep seer
dpkg-buildpackage (fails)
enable stretch repo
apt-get update && apt
control: owner -1 !
control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi, looking at requirements.txt, seems that six is used
grep six . -R |grep import
./model_mommy/utils.py:from six import string_types
./model_mommy/generators.py:import six
./model_mommy/recipe.py:from six import string_types
./model_mommy/mommy.py:fr
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi, I can sponsor the package, lets see what needs fixing/answering:
setup.py/install_requires is your friend, please use it, and drop
the hardcoded runtime-dependencies using python:Depends
(and check if everything is good)
build and run:
$ comitup
T
Hi,
python-skimage should be RC free now (if no other RC bugs are opened of course
:) )
let me know when you have updates,
G.
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi, I did a quick look and the package looks great!
(I grabbed it from mentors)
however I have some things I would like to discuss / see fixed:
1) W: libcork source: debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version line 7
2) lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0
control: tags -1 moreinfo
control: owner -1 !
hi,
1) I: shadowsocks-libev: extended-description-is-probably-too-short
2)W: shadowsocks-libev source: debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version line 7
3)
Replaces: shadowsocks (<< 1.5.3-2)
Breaks: shadowsocks (<< 1.5.3-2)
Why?
4)libipset/ <-- debia
Hi,
>It's false positive.
ack
>> 2) lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2016-05-31 21:37 ./usr/lib/libcork.so.15
>> -> libcork.so.16.0.1
>The SONAME (15) and version (16.0.1) are given by upstream.
>I guess it's also for legacy reason, to be compatible with other system.
>So better not change by our
Hi again,
>It's false positive.
ack
>> Replaces: shadowsocks (<< 1.5.3-2)
>> Breaks: shadowsocks (<< 1.5.3-2)
>
>Thanks to co-maintainer Boyuan, below comments are from him.
>
>
>Upstream used to use the package name **`shadowsocks'** long long ago,
>and the name was changed into `shadows
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi, I tried to build and run, and (I admit, I'm behind a proxy)
it failed with an error like
runescape
mv: cannot stat 'jagexappletviewer.jar': No such file or directory
Gtk-Message: GtkDialog mapped without a transient parent. This is discouraged.
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi, please fix the above/below, and maybe think about using pkg-games-devel to
maintain that package
(and ping back once you fixed that)
cheers,
G.
Il Lunedì 23 Maggio 2016 15:03, Adam Borowski ha scritto:
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 02:07:39AM +0500, Andrey Rahmatull
Hi, I don't know if Nobuhiro wants to sponsor or not.
In case a little additional review:
arch: all?
I don't think it is good to try to build dkms during build.
the modules are useless anyway, and they have to be built during package
installation
(it might be good for an autopkgtestsuite).
this
really attaching it :)
g.
Il Mercoledì 1 Giugno 2016 17:27, Gianfranco Costamagna
ha scritto:
Hi, I don't know if Nobuhiro wants to sponsor or not.
In case a little additional review:
arch: all?
I don't think it is good to try to build dkms during build.
the modules are usel
Hi,
>On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 04:33:26PM +0200, Stanislas Leduc wrote:
>> Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
>> * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]
>> * License : [fill in]
>Huh?
well, this is fixed in #820705 :)
Stanislas, please fix and ping ba
Hi, yes please fix the libpng build failure and the embedded libraries and I'll
have another look
here some hints about how to fix that
https://titanpad.com/libpng16-transistion
BTW general note:
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pkg-games-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
pkg-games-devel i
Hi, do you want something like this?
http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers
G.
Il Mercoledì 1 Giugno 2016 17:42, Marwan Rabbâa ha scritto:
Hi,
I have created a debian package
https://packagecloud.io/waghanza/plunder/packages/debian/jessie/phantomjs_2.1.1_amd64.deb.
I am not aware of d
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi, as usual, I'm available for a new -science package, so I'll sponsor
as soon as Ghislain is fine with the packaging.
BTW I did a quick review, and it sounds fine to me
I'm not sure about the multi-arch: foreign tag
and about the lintian override:
O: gneural-network:
Hi, I uploaded the package on binnew queue.
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/libntl.git/commit/?id=abd150f5fd1b277b7f47fb27c9c958f49d06a7ba
I changed unstable to experimental, next time please don't forget that :)
(BTW please check reverse-depends for buildability, open bugs
Hi Sérgio, can you please check the above/below and report back?
I can do another check/review when you fix it.
thanks,
G.
Il Sabato 21 Maggio 2016 19:36, Andrey Rahmatullin ha scritto:
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>From d/copyright, this is not distributable as it combines GPL2 and GPL3+.
Hi, feel free to reopen whenever you want :)
G.
Il Giovedì 2 Giugno 2016 12:36, Ben Wiederhake ha
scritto:
Control: close -1
Control: thanks
Am 02.06.2016 um 05:25 schrieb mentors.debian.net:
> Your package telegram-purple all versions has been removed from
> mentors.debian.net for the fo
yes,
Debian Haskell Group (in cc) might give you some hints :)
G.
Il Giovedì 2 Giugno 2016 14:47, Marwan Rabbâa ha scritto:
but still have a question
this app is in haskell and I built i with stack
https://www.stackage.org
I do not thing stack use internal distribution libraries.
Is the
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
can you please fix the lintian stuff?
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/libretro-snes9x/1.53+git20151206-1/lintian
specially the copyright stuff.
G.
On Sun, 22 May 2016 17:50:52 -0300 =?UTF-8?Q?S=c3=a9rgio_Benjamim?=
wrote:
>
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
lets see:
"export PYTHON=`which python3`" what?
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/subuser/0.5.6-1/lintian
please fix the first lintian warning.
"Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${python3:Depends}, python3-setuptools, git,
doc
Hi, please fix lintian
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/emulationstation-theme-simple/1.4-1/lintian
look at the comments on mentors page
https://mentors.debian.net/package/emulationstation
and
lintian for the main package.
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#uns
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
lets see:
usr/include/libvpd-2/*
usr/lib/*/*.so
usr/lib/*/pkgconfig/*
maybe you can put
usr/include
usr/lib/*/*.so
usr/lib/*/pkgconfig
(I didn't check the above)
and for the library you can do something like
usr/lib/*/lib*.so.*
"etc/udev
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
the same for libvpd applies here
"License: GPL-2+ with librtas exception"
maybe something like
License: GPL-2+-with-librtas-exception
is better (check lintian if complains)
abort-upgrade|abort-remove|abort-deconfigure)
;;
useless ^^
apt-get inst
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
the same for the other two libraries applies here, in addition:
please run check-all-the-things, something should be fixed.
g.
Il Giovedì 2 Giugno 2016 18:06, Frederic Bonnard ha
scritto:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
D
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi, in additions to the other stuff:
GPL-2+ seems the right license.
other stuff LGTM
(please also run check-all-the-things/lintian and fix stuff)
cheers,
G.
Il Giovedì 2 Giugno 2016 18:09, Frederic Bonnard ha
scritto:
Package: sponsorship
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi, in additions to the other reviews, lintian and check-all-the-things, please:
why no-doc package? I see doxygen here
other stuff LGTM
Il Giovedì 2 Giugno 2016 18:12, Frederic Bonnard ha
scritto:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: norm
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi, also here, please check the usual stuff (also cppcheck is reporting some
issues)
General note: I suggest you to do only one of the reviews, and fix all of them.
I prefer to see only one package at each time, sponsor it, wait for you to fix
the s
Hi,
>The same... what? I can't parse this sentence.
the same review done for the other packages applies to this one
(yes, indeed I should have written it better, I explained it somewhere else)
>"FOO with BAR exception" is a valid licence syntax in DEP-5.>If it is not
>appropriate to use it i
Hi, after the latest fixes I put the package in deferred/5, to leave Sean
enough time to review it and ack
the latest changes.
thanks for the nice contribution to Debian!
G.
Il Mercoledì 1 Giugno 2016 12:51, nord-stream
ha scritto:
Source: firefox-branding-iceweasel
This package includes
Hi,
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-getobject"
sponsored.
G.
* Package name: node-getobject
Version : 0.1.0-2
Upstream Author : "Cowboy" Ben Alman
* URL : https://github.com/cowboy/node-getobject
* License : MIT
Section : we
Hi, sending what I do on my machine
>Il Venerdì 3 Giugno 2016 17:44, Ghislain Vaillant ha
>scritto:
>Dear all,
>
>Are there any successful examples of integration of help2man with a
>pybuild / debhelper workflow for an arbitrary number of scripts?
>
>The only close example I could find was the
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
>http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dvtm/dvtm_0.15-1~bpo8+1.dsc
404
G.
Hi
>Spaces are not allowed in license names. But here the license name is
>just “GPL-2+”.
>
>Let me quote the relevant part of the spec:
>“An exception or clarification to a license is signalled in plain text,
>by appending ‘with exception’ to the short name.”
probably when I tried
a) this w
control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Sun, 15 May 2016 15:59:09 + Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:09:14PM -0800, Nathan Osman wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package
> > "golang-github-kennygrant-sanitize"
>
> > http://mentors.debian.net/package/golang-github-kennygr
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Setting moreinfo until the blocking bug is resolved.
G.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Mar 2016 20:48:46 -0800 Afif Elghraoui wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi, Marko,
>
> On اÙØ£Øد 6 آذار 2016 14:53, Marko DimjaÅ¡eviÄ wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 17:42 -0800, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
> >> Som
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Setting moreinfo tags, until the first review is fixed.
Gianfranco
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi
On 06/06/2016 03:53, Carlos Donizete Froes wrote:
> Hello Gianfranco,
>
> I made the changes recommended me. Please could again analyze my
> package?
>
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/runescape
>
> Thank you!
>
Hi
some more issues:
1) you put dependencies under build-dependencies, b
Hi,
>$ ./debian/rules build
which llvm version did upstream bundle?
LLVM folks are known for breaking API between releases, so maybe just you need a
specific llvm version rather than the default one.
G.
Hi,
>i am maintaining many packages, which were maintained by Adam
>originally. But all of them are team-maintained (Debian Science), and this
>one is not.
>
>AFAIK Adam is not active in Debian last several years. From my point of
>view, it will not be too offensive, if evolver will be moved und
Hi,
>May I fill an ITA or something to signify that someone to working
>the [surface] evolver package ?
A bug with patches should be enough, ITA means somebody orphaning the package
and only the maintainer/MIA team can do it.
But a bug with patches and you proposing the maintainership is someth
Hi,
>Right now the package rocks.
>But the upstream version is (very) old, and the Debian package material
>clearly needs some refreshment. Is a patch really appropriate here ?
>May I rather wait for clear orphaning instead ?
I see (2.30 VS 2.70)...
what about:
gbp import-dscs --debsnap git-imp
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "groonga"
Hi, I did a debdiff between them, and I see some changes that might be ABI
breaking the library:
-GRN_API grn_rc grn_timeval_now(grn_ctx *ctx, grn_timeval *tv);
-GRN_API grn_rc grn_timeval
hi
>* experimental APIs
>* stable APIs
fair enough. sponsored.
G.
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>https://mentors.debian.net/package/lsvpd
can you please remove moreinfo once the package enters unstable?
thanks
G.
> the same for libvpd applies here
>
> "License: GPL-2+ with librtas exception"
>
> maybe something like
> License: GPL-2+-with-librtas-exception
On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 16:27:59 +0000 (UTC), Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> control: owner -1 !
> control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi, in additions to the other stuff:
>
>
> GPL-2+ seems the right license.
>
> other stuff LGTM
> (please also run check-all-the-things/l
usr/lib/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/libservicelog.so -> libservicelog-1.1.so.1.0.0
F.
On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 16:23:45 + (UTC), Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> control: owner -1 !
> control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi,
> the same for the other two libraries applies here, in addition:
>
thout-manpage usr/sbin/ppc64_diag_register
W: ppc64-diag: binary-without-manpage usr/sbin/rtas_errd
Those are scripts called by systemd unit files. Is it acceptable or should they
be moved to another place? I saw both cases in codesearch.d.n
Thanks,
F.
On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 16:32:05 +0000 (UTC), Gianfra
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
>Il Sabato 11 Giugno 2016 18:21, Sven Joachim ha scritto:
yes, please fix what Sven pointed out (with a great thanks from me)
I can just add some little additional notes
(please note: I didn't do a full review, without the latest changelog e
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "growl-for-linux"
lets review:
1) I really don't like a 2k lines long changelog for an initial inclusion.
most of the lines are "backport to dist foo"
I would just delete them, keeping a public than
Hi,
>My bad. I should put 'apt-get update' into cron.
or use "pull-debian-source packagename [version]" :)
>Sent it. Seems I can't include control into message to
>826...@bugs.debian.org
package is now in QA
>I considered some of them. Other require more prolonged
>experimentation on my si
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dh-runit"
while I did some work on runit package a while ago, I'm not sure about
how you want the packages to use your new shiny dh call?
how do you plan to notify them about it?
do you plan to open a lot
control: owner -1 !
>Hi, could you please also ship my systemd integration (see upstream PR and
>branch)?
Andrew, do you plan to upload the package once this is fixed?
I see Jakub already did a wonderful review, and the current package on mentors
seems
to address his concerns.
I see your pul
Hi Jakub and Dmitry
(ccing you both, not sure if you are subscribed to the bug)
>You are probably[0] referring to:
>
>P: gdbm source: license-problem-gfdl-non-official-text doc/gdbm.info invariant
>part is: with no invariant sections, no front-cover, and no back-cover texts
>P: gdbm source: lice
control: owner -1 andrew.shado...@gmail.com
>I think I could.
setting you as owner :)
>There's https://github.com/wertarbyte/triggerhappy/commits/systemd but
>I haven't looked how much does it conflict with the master branch.
I did merge the systemd branch into master, and it merged correctly
Hi,
>I deleted them and added notes about original maintainer for simplicity.
wonderful
>Applied above, then enabled pie explicitly for gol again to make package in
>good shape.
I see, nice!
>I'll apply patch when actually it is needed.
let me disagree a little bit :)
people might already
Hi,
>Can we do something to make this available to the users as soon as
>possible? Now firefox-esr is out for stable users, too.
the current package needs to migrate in testing first, and then you need to
check with
-release team if a stable-proposed-update is feasible or not
(I see esr is in w
Hi, fixed the summary
(please keep the RFS in cc, otherwise I can easily forget because the package
in this topic
is already sponsored)
>CPPFLAGS is actually for both c and cpp:
yep I know
>I can avoid "hardening-no-fortify-functions" only if there's a> CPPFLAGS in
>the cpp line.
sure
q
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "runit"
lets see
1)
+ * New maintainer
did Gerrit asked for help?
stepping in as maintainer needs an RFH or Orphan package.
(well, Gerrit was fine on giving up some packages IIRC)
2)
compat level 10 not
Hi,
>It appears that some tests fail for one of my package (gmp-ecm) on one
>architecture (s390x):
>after some investigation, it appears that it is a compiler issue: building
>with gcc-6 (instead of gcc-5)
>causes no issue. So now I want to impose the gcc-6 to d/rules ? What is the
>best way to
Hi,
>Why do you think it would be useless?
the "bug" is introduce with a stable-release-update, and should be fixed
with another s-p-u
fixing it with a backport means the user should be aware of the fix in another
pocket, enable it, install it, and so on.
I guess having both "issue" and "fix"
Hi Adam,
(answering in general, not in this particular situation)
>I've reviewed the upload, but I'm not sure if you coordinated it
>with the LTS team. I find a contradition:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts/2016/06/msg00031.html
>says vlc is no longer supported in wheezy, yet in
> https
Hi,
>As far as I know, the plan is to switch to gcc-6 by default for stretch:
>https://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2016/01/msg00100.html
>so while identifying and backporting the fix to gcc-5 would be nice, I'd
>recommend not putting too much effort there.
fully agree, this is why I didn't bothe
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I'm not sure whether you've coordinated this with the KDE team. I don't see
>you among KDE packagers, and you haven't noted this in the RFS. NMU
>backports are fine, but please say so if this is your intent.
indeed, I'm tagging it moreinfo until this is sorted out
(
control: noowner -1
Hi,
>actually I'm not okay with anyone taking over the runit packge. And I
>don't see why runit needs an update in Debian. The few bugs are known
>and can be worked around if necessary.
well, updating the packaging is something I generally like a lot, it makes
easier to
his package?
>
> On Wednesday 27 April 2016 12:53:06 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> > Hi Pali and mentors,
> >
> > (redirecting the question to -mentors, because I don't have a
> > strong opinion on this)
> >
> > >Looks like we do not have exac
Hi
>Get it fixed upstream.
other than that, the manpage issue can be "probably" fixed by
"PYTHONPATH=."
before invoking help2man
and of course using ./bin/codespell.py as argument
oh, and I think manpage generation should be done
in override_dh_installman, not dh_auto_build target.
so, so
Hi,
Il Sabato 18 Giugno 2016 21:45, Frank Stähr ha scritto:
>I think we are nearly ready, don’t give up.
I *never* give up :)
>Nevertheless, I don’t see why e. g. boost/algorithm/string/trim.hpp is
>guaranteed to be installed. It might be a coincidence that it is
>included by regex or pro
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi, lets see
1) control: why the -dev package is not multiarch?
sounds like it is multiarch ready to me
(I didn't check but include/* seems to have the same md5sum on different archs
2) the dev package should suggest the doc one
3) d/p/0002-fix-bu
Hi,
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "growl-for-linux"
LGTM
Uploaded.
G.
Hi Roger
>Packaging another library (libipset) just takes some time.
I can understand that, and my review will probably take some more time :)
>Technically yes, but since it's a quite old version, I think nobody would do
>it.
>And currently "shadowsocks" is a python program in Debian archive, w
Hi,
>Corrected the dependencies in d/control
ack
>Made to create a makefile. :/
but why?
[Sergio Durigan Junion]
> metadata stuff
Sergio is correct, thanks!
anyway, it seems working, so please answer the above and I'll do the final
checks
and hopefully upload.
G.
Hi
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gdbm"
BTW not ITP :) (wrt message header)
sponsoring in a few seconds, with a change
s/UNRELEASED/experimental.
G.
Hi Roger,
>Control: retitle -1 RFS: libcorkipset/1.1.1+20150311-1 [ITP] -- C
>library to store sets/maps of IP address
thanks for that!
>I think you didn't review since you did last time, and I did some
>changes based on some changes in previous post, so here I *rewrite*
>the previous post.
th
control: tags -1 pending
> control: tag -1 +confirmed
Hi Sean, thanks for the really nice review!
I did sponsor on deferred/5, because I would like to have a feedback about the
following
>+ remove build-depends on libgtk2.0-dev, libmagickcore-extra,
> autotools-dev, imagemagick.
mmm
Hi Sean,
>I think that we should avoid thinking that one purpose of source-only
>uploads is to deal with DDs and DMs intentionally subverting security by
>means of dodgy binaries. We already place a great deal of trust in
>those who can upload packages, and it doesn't make sense to say that,
>d
Hi,
>The changes I have quoted above are not usually appropriate for NMUs.
>In particular, changing from a version 1.0 to a 3.0 source package could
>annoy the current package maintainers a great deal.
>
>In this case, it looks like those package maintainers are inactive (no
>uploads since 2005).
Hi Roger
>> cat debian/libcorkipset-doc.docs
>> build-*/docs/html
>
>Debian builds obj- by default.
>So it seems to specify "--builddirectory=build" safe for both debian and
>ubuntu.
yes, but useless...
maybe you didn't get completely the hint, but my guess was:
remove the --builddirectory st
Hi,
>Added the "metadata" in d/upstream
wonderful!
>Sorry, I do not have programming skills in C and makefile.
actually the "issue" is:
-why did you create a c code that only starts a program?
you can start it directly, with a bash script, as it was done before.
I'm not sure having a program
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
control: tags -1 pending
Hi, I did a review, and uploaded on deferred/15 (please Peter and Jesus ack the
changes or give
a feedback about the QA upload if you aren't interested in the package anymore)
with a little change.
license seems really GPL-2+
Hi Dmitry!
>Recently, I took over gdbm package and got new version into
>experimental. Now I work on fixing reverse dependencies FTBFS.
>
>Given I have patch for one of rdependency (camldbm, namely). What now?
>Should I ask maintainer to apply it and make upload into experimental?
>Or something el
control: owner -1 spwhit...@spwhitton.name
yes, I did that ^^ :D
and I have *no* regrets :p
BTW I'm thrilled about bringing VIM to EMACS :D
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "evil"
I think Sean can give a more appropriate review, but lets go:
"make" in rules --> $(MAKE) please
ap
Hi,
>Okay. But if they apply this patch right now, package will not build
>aganist unstable. Is it okay?
just mention that in the bug report, this will allow me/you to NMU when the
transition starts
>FAIL camldbm_1.0-2.dsc -- patch ready
>FAIL courier_0.73.1-1.6.dsc
>FAIL free
Hi
>> >Okay. But if they apply this patch right now, package will not build
>> >aganist unstable. Is it okay?
>> just mention that in the bug report, this will allow me/you to NMU when the
>> transition starts
>
>
>Okay.
to be clear, NMU rules are the usual ones, e.g. NMU if no maintainer an
Hi,
>I think you build on ubuntu, so without "--builddirectory stuff" the
>build directory is
>build-*/
>When I tested in Debian, the build directory is obj-*/
>That's why I insist keeping "--builddirectory stuff" to make same
>install file for both Debian and Ubuntu.
nope, Ubuntu calls it obj-*
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinf
>I am looking for sponsorship for the Debian package sollya [1], an
quick look:
1)
Suggests: libsollya-dev (=${binary:Version}), sollya-doc (= ${source:Version})
so, the main sollya package is not using the library?
2)
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends
Hi,
>hash: 73310900c65c7d56fb639868ed574424e9fdbec8
ERR:
goto-chg (1.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
Source: goto-chg-el
dpkg-source: error: source package has two conflicting values - goto-chg-el and
goto-chg
please fix and I'll sponsor :)
thanks
G.
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
>Thanks for adopting this package.
+1
please try to be more verbose in changelog:
>bump std-version (maybe extract in a new changelog entry)
copyright in machine readable format
d/p/0001: did you forward it upstream?
>override_dh_auto_cle
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Setting moreinfo, as per previous message.
Gianfranco
Hi
> this package are market as done! but the package are still not in
> debian package !
or use incoming.debian.org :)
G.
Hi
>1) mentors removes the packages too soon or policies are ilogic!
>2) seems uploaded to ftp package polls but not found? sponsored !?
3) the bug is closed, so the package is sponsored, you need to wait until it
shows
up on debian systems.
yes, there is a hole in which the package isn't avail
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi, lintian is not too happy with your changes
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/twinkle/1.9.0+git20160520.0.be8b8df+dfsg-1/lintian
please fix the above if possible,
Gianfranco
Il Martedì 28 Giugno 2016 5:21, Peter Colberg h
Hi,
>3) Any reason why you're using debhelper version 10? It's still
>experimental, so you probably should be using version 9.
I'm not sure about this, some days ago debhelper 11 implementation started, so
I think compat
level 10 is somewhat considered stable?
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/d
Hi,
>> > Unfortunately, upstream maintains only list of contributors. So seems
>> > best thing we can do is to count 60 years from last debian upload.
>>
>> I'm not sure whether this is likely to be acceptable to the ftp-masters
>> or not. Perhaps someone more experienced on debian-mentors can
control: owner -1 !
control: tags-1 moreinfo
Hi,
control:
description should be extended a lot
some build-dependencies might be useless, did you check that? e.g. dh-buildinfo
intltool (note: I'm not checking the above)
"python2.7" <-- what?
I don't see any Python script here, and I see only
./
1 - 100 of 1488 matches
Mail list logo
